Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JackG - V- Barclays Bank


JackG
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5796 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Dar£n

 

You're right, part 1 does say,'The particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in question and/or the precise charges alleged to have been unlawful, or the date thereof. To the extent it is alleged that the Claimant incurred bank charges n the Claimant's account for unauthorised borrowings (whether unpaid feed for returned cheques "paid referral fees" or any other such fees), the defendent puts the claimant to strict proof of each charge and the date thereof.

 

 

Are they saying that they have not rec'd my SOC's which I have sent 3 times already and by recorded delivery!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 259
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Jack, if you have not sent an updated SOC to both parties since receiving a copy of their defence send it now by recorded delivery, we all know you have sent it previously but they use it in an attempt to get the claim slung out.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack, I would also check with your local court as to whether an AQ fee is payable even though there is no AQ. Apparently some courts are still asking for the fee, and sometimes they haven't told the claimant that it's required. This could result in a hiccup with procedures.

Just ring the court and ask, - if they say 'No fee required' get a name of who told you.

 

Then sit back and wait for a court date - when you get the court date send a gentle nudge letter to Adrian St John - My experience is they'll offer you full settlement about 2-3 weeks before that date. (I've just had my full settlement offer (25 May) and my court date was 12 June.

 

Stick with bit Jack , you're doing fine - it'll work out in the end!

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all,

 

Thanks yr replies you two. Do I send uptodate SOC's to Adiran St John and Barclays, or Adrian St John and local Court, not clear who?

 

Will ring Court today and ask re' fee for AQ.

 

thanks again, can feel it's getting closer now and could really do with Court date so know timescale I've got.

 

Congrats Johnnymitch on your full settlement offer, thats good to know Barclays are not messing right at end and seeing sense.

 

Best wishes to all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack, now that you have started court proceedings ALL correspondence will be sent to the Litigations Team at Barclays, 1 Chirchill Place, London E14 5HP.[Recorded Delivery]

 

Send an updated SOC to both B's and the court with this letter:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dar£n

 

Thanks your link to letter template, but when I got there could only find letter to Court to accompany my SOC, could not see a letter that would accompany it to Barclays Sols, do you have any idea what to write to them as need to get wording correct

 

thanks yr help tho' as I wouldn't have been able to get this far without it, that much I do know

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Jack, I should have added, just amend it to the Barclays details instead of the courts........Soz!!!!!!!!

 

Litigation Dept,

Barclays Bank Plc

1 Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir,

 

(Your Name) -v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my schedule of charges relating to the above claim.

 

This is the teplate letter from here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/71369-getting-mcol-right.html

so i imagine that it should be ok for use now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Dar£n and saintly_1 for yr swift replies.

 

All done now and will send off 1st class recorded delivery tomorrow

 

Just awaiting court date then all systems go..........I hope!

 

best wishes to all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, just an update so far

 

Still have not heard re' court date so getting rather anxious now as thought I'd hear pretty much straight away.

 

Sent updated SOC's to Adrian St John and local court that hearing has been allocated to, haven't yet rang Court to check if AQ fee required but must do that tomorrow, just had so little time lately.

 

Been reading latest news on Hull court striking out claims - wondering when other courts will follow.........

 

Hope mine not first with my local court, just have to wait and see.

 

Good luck to all with claims, keep fighting on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi saintly-1

 

that was a great thread, brill news isn't it?

 

Just when you read a bad one, a successful one pops up too.

 

maybe I'm just a little impatient, has anyone rang their local court and asked for a hearing date yet? I need to ring them to see if I have to submit AQ fee even tho' AQ has been dispensed of..... so if anyone thinks its good midea to ask what happening with my court date, then I willl ask that question too.

 

Just wondering..........

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will still have to pay the £100 fee for the AQ even if it has been dispensed with.

 

When you phone ask when you should expect a date through, i did and was told at the end of June and low and behold a date came through the next day for the 21st June. So dont be afraid to ask, the worst they can say is we are not sure at the moment.

Good luck, hope you get the answer you are looking for

Caz

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will still have to pay the £100 fee for the AQ even if it has been dispensed with.

Caz, although they made you pay the fee, it is at the judges discretion whether to request it.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not everyone has been required to pay the AQ fee Caz, that's why I said in thread 104 to check with the court and if they say not required, get the name of who told you. If you have to pay the fee don't forget to update your SOC before you send it to DG.

 

Jack, there's no harm in asking when you ring the court if they can give you some idea of a date - they're definitely getting busier though, so it's a case of 'more patience' I'm afraid. But you've done well, Jack , the worst is over - a court date is all you need and the rest will follow.

Obviously, they're having to settle the ones which are getting near to court before the others, so the court date is the cruncher!

Stick with it, Jack, you've earned it!

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Johnnymitch

 

You're right, I spoke to Court today and they said they had just received notice of transfer of proceedings and when I asked if a court date would be soon they said it would be at the Judges discretion but that I would hear within the next week. I then asked re' AQ fee as on my Notice of Transfer of Proceedings' where it mentions AQ should be completed and returned to my local court was crossed out, when I asked them if a fee was applicable, they said it would also be at Judges discretion and that I would hear regarding everything in about a weeks time, so there, my questions answered all in one go. So, afraid wil just have to sit it all out and wait again.

 

Hope its soon as going on hols in 61/2 weeks time and would like it all over and done with before I go instead of it dragging on.

 

thanks yr input everyone, you are all really supportive and helpful, don't feel I give much input, but still not confident of anything I do so don't feel able to advise anyone at all.

 

thanks again and will keep you all posted when I reach next stage of game!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always found the courts pretty helpful , Jack, I think they're cheesed off with the banks using them as a stick to beat the poor customers into giving up - but we won't give up, will we?

 

It would be nice to get your money to go on holiday with, - maybe touch and go though, depending on your court date.

 

Just to motivate you further, Jack I can tell you - I got my cheque this morning from Barclays!!!! Eighteen hundred + smackeroonies !!!!!

YIPPEEEE!!!

 

MAKES IT ALL WORTHWHILE EH???:D :D :D

Hang in there, girl, keep in touch - it'll be your turn soon.

Cheers

John

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats absolutely brill!!! Good for you and well done.

 

It does make it all worthwhile in the end, I can see that. Just when I'm feeling despondent someone comes back with great news like that.

 

 

Congratulations on your win and receiving your cheque today.

 

HAPPY SPENDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

 

 

Thought they put it straight into your accout, or do you get a choice. Would be nice to know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another thought?

 

Should I pm a moderator to let him know of transfer of proceedings to local court, or should I wait until Court date and then inform him?

 

Can't quite remember..............altho' maybe my thread is being watched over???????? (hopefully, for me)

 

 

thanksxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ,Jack , I hope that's encouraged you a bit!

 

 

Thought they put it straight into your account, or do you get a choice. Would be nice to know?

 

The account with Barclays was closed in Dec 2004 after they charged £30 on 3 consecutive days - 22,23,and Xmas eve!!

Who said revenge is a dish best served cold?

 

I asked them to pay by cheque - and I can't see any reason for them refusing anyone, unless there's still an excessive overdraft problem.

Has anyone else got any thoughts on this?

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...