Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

**attention All Fast Trackers**


zootscoot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Those of you who are not aware of Jamorgan's claim please read this:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/27030-harsh-letter-received-kensington.html

 

Particularly p.7

 

It is important that you are aware of the full cost implications of your claim.

 

I am currently reviewing all mortgage claims particularly fast track. If you have a fast track claim please reply to this thread with a summary of progress so far and a link to your thread. Please do not panic or make any hasty decisions until I have reviewed the position.

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/12746-mortgage-express-erc.html

 

Disclosure List to be submited by 2/02 - with inspection by 16/02 - trial to be listed sometime in July.

ERC £5020 plus 8% = £6265

Cobbetts in Leeds handling case.

Claim against Mortgage Express but original mortgage was with GMAC who sold account to ME after 18 months or so.

No arrears.

SAR bought up a list of abbreviations used by ME - one being REDEMPTION INT = Penalty interest charged for early redemption of the account.

Spent £350 so far on court and AQ costs

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoot, here is the link for my case.

 

Summary:

Trial date for March 16th.

Fast track.

Have received defence.

Have swapped witness statements but nothing on court directions about inspection.

Have received their bundle. I dont have to send mine according to directions.

Have sent CPR part 18 request for further info which they said i would get in witness statement, however the info i requested was not included.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/46576-me-swift.html

 

Mrsfoot

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoot, thanks for bringing this to our attention.

 

I have an allocation hearing against Paragon on Wednesday afternoon for a refund of my ERC (around £1500), and KJ Boutcher is scheduled in at the same time. I'd appreciate any advice you might have about what we should/shouldn't do there. In view of jamorgan's decision, is it even worth trying for allocation to the small claims track? Should we offer to concede to fast track if they'll stop pressing for multi track? Will we have to pay the costs of the allocation hearing if we do this?

 

Sorry to bother you, you probably have better things to be doing, but I see that we need to tread rather carefully now and I don't know what to do.

 

thanks

 

Kate

Nationwide: £2443. Settled in full

Co-operative Bank Visa: £351. Settled in full.

MBNA Visa: £476. Settled in full.

AA Account with Capital Bank: £80. Settled in full.

Capital One Visa: £160. Settled in full.

Paragon Personal Finance: £120 fees SETTLED ERC claim withdrawn Feb 07.

Kensington Mortgages: Claim withdrawn Feb 07.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ladymoonray

 

No the last thing you want to do is to concede to the fast track. Your claim is well below the 5K threshold and you bought the claim in the belief that it would be dealt with in the small claims track. It is a consumer dispute and you are a litigant in person, therefore the small claims is the most appropriate track to determine yur dispute. Fast track is designed for larger claims where both parties are represented. If they argue that it should be multi -tracked because it affects their business in a substantial way, you should respond that you should not have to bear the risk of them wishing to save the impact on the business. A defeat in the small claims would not set a precedent and could therefore not impact on their business. Remind the court of the overriding objectives particularly the need to ensure the parties are on an equal footing and the case should be dealt with in a way which is proportionate to the amount claimed and the financial position of the parties.

 

The only way in which you concede fast or multi-track is in the event that a no costs order is made against you.

 

A couple of mortgage cases I remember that had an allocation hearing. Sandy v Gmac was allocated to fast track but with a no costs order and Anna v Abbey in which small track was ordered when Abbey requested Multi.

 

Best of luck.

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Zoot. We'll go in with those arguments tomorrow and see what happens. Do you think we should take copies of the draft order with us? I didn't attach it to my AQ, as I filled it in ages ago.

 

I'll post on my thread when I get back!

 

Kate

Nationwide: £2443. Settled in full

Co-operative Bank Visa: £351. Settled in full.

MBNA Visa: £476. Settled in full.

AA Account with Capital Bank: £80. Settled in full.

Capital One Visa: £160. Settled in full.

Paragon Personal Finance: £120 fees SETTLED ERC claim withdrawn Feb 07.

Kensington Mortgages: Claim withdrawn Feb 07.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoot,

We're after UCB(Nationwide) for £10,794 plus £224.89 interest.

All letters done and N1 submitted on 10/1/07.

They have notified intention to defend on FRI 19th and according to the timeline spreadsheet this will need to be filed by Feb 2nd.

Currently studying "Harsh letter..." and other parallel type threads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoot and Gizmo

 

Just a quick update for both of you

 

I am going to court on the 1st Feb to procede with my claim .

I withdrew my agreement on Monday this week.

 

Any advice is welcome.

 

Thanks

 

MF5

Halifax Bank plc £1573 settled 19/6/ 06 :D

 

Abbey National PLC

Settled in full £1,754 15/9/06 :grin:

 

Halifax Credit Card £441.63 settled in full 27/10/06 :-)

 

 

Mortgage Express ERP

Pre letter 10/7/06

LBA 27/7/06

MCOL issued 6/9/06

Court Date Feb 06

Lost in court costs awarded £7,500PAYPAL [email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoot

 

Have been given a court date for fast track hearing sometime in late June/early July.

 

Have forwarded court & Eversheds copy of disclosure list.

 

I need to serve statements of all witnesses by 23rd Feb 07. However, the docs say no party has permission to rely on expret evidence.

 

Pre trial checklist needs to be filed by 18th May 07.

 

And court bunde not less than 7 days before trial.

 

It seems my case seems to be going in a different direction than others - they have not requested it to be struck out, I've not had to attend an allocation hearing - I was just sent a date. I'm not sure if this is good or bad - a bit concerned I may end up paying Kensingtons fee's should they win. :|

Halifax 1

WON - £1,355.49 21/07/06

MINT

WON - £273.81 14/09/06

First Direct

WON - £913.50 01/09/06

Capital One

WON - £130.13 03/11/06

Halifax 2

WON - £188.03 01/12/06

 

Kensington Mortgages ERC

MCOL for £6,204.39 Discontinued

Halifax Mortgage Admin fee

WON - £10.00

Direct Line Mortgage Redemption Fee

WON - £99.00

Halifax 3

MCOL for £109.01 reg 07/03/07

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/redemptionfees/

Please sign this petition x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a 7 year fixed rate mortgage with A***Y. At the time of taking out the mortgage I also purchased an endowment policy from the same group. 5 years later the group accepting mis selling the endowment to me and compensated me for the shortfall that I faced. Having lost faith with the group I settled up my mortgage and went elsewhere. £4,500.00 in penalties for my troubles. I issued proceedings, my arguement being that as the whole mortgage had been mis sold to me the seller couldn't rely on any of the terms of the contract. We had a directions hearing today at which the Judge bottled it and agreed that the matter should be fast tracked rather than be dealt with in the Small Claims Court, despite the claim being under £5K.

I'm not sure whether to continue with the action.

Any thoughts would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me, I wouldn't continue. You are in grave danger of having costs awarded against you now and you can see on this forum the damage it has caused. Zoot has put a sticky up, I believe, on how to go about trying to withdraw with minimum damage.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...