Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me and moorcroft


russb87
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6343 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

I have had a few letters from moorcroft about a debt to t-mobile, yes im in debt, ok, and i want to pay it back, I arranged to pay £75 a month, a couple of months ago, paid one month, then couldnt afford the next, because of xmas and such. Now would it be possible to delay the next payment for a month or 2, whilst I pay my family the debts i owe them, I will be able to pay them within a month i think, But need to keep moorcroft off my back, I have read threads that say, look at the sticky, but i cant find no sticky, so can anyone give me a link?

 

Thanks

 

Russ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum Russ. It is not necessary to do the recovering alcoholic

type speech :D-most of us here are or have been in debt too.

When you make arrangements to pay these guys you have to resist their

attempts to squeeze as much as possible out of you each month.So only pay an amount that you know you can afford despite whatever other calls may be made on your finances, like Christmas. It doesn't look good if they take you to Court and your repayment plan has fallen at the first hurdle.

That being said, before you pay them anything, it is advisable to ensure

that they do have the right to collect the debt.

 

Send them a CCA request first asking them for a copy of your original contract. I know that T-mobile say they are not governed by the Consumer

Credit Act, but you sure have run up some credit with them. In any event,

this request will halt any collection attempts by Moorcroft until it is settled

whether you receive a copy of the contract or not. If the answer is no they

will not send you a copy, then you will have to send an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to T-mobile.

This should be the means to get all the documentation. You can tell Moorcroft

that you are disputing the amount of the debt with T-mobile, and the dispute will remain in force until T-mobile comply with your request. [This could be

for a month at least]. You should also receive documents relating to correspondence between T-mobile and Moorcroft so you can confirm that

they can collect on their behalf. You should also get details of any charges that T-mobile have added to your account. Some of these charges may be unlawful and you can get them removed from the debt [eventually].You should

learn from their documents how much the debt is with T-mobile and check

that Moorcroft haven't added their own as well.

 

This should give you the breathing space you need to get your payment

plan back on track. But if it is stretching you, when the time gets closer to restarting the payments, wtite to Moorcroft to negotiate a more

handleable figure.

To get the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) you will finid that in the FAQ section on the first page of the

forum. It is important to read this anyway to understand your rights when

dealing with companies who are chasing you for debts and sending in debt

collectors. There is no reason to pay more than legally required.

 

The CCA request is located in the top part of the "General " section of the debts section. After the legal threads, there are a succession of threads

that begin with the word "sticky" and the last one contains a series of

template letters bt Barracad, one of which is the one you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello there

 

Just wondered if anyone could help with regards to Moorcroft - my elderly Mother had a call last week from Moorcroft with regards to an outstanding debt of around £1100.00 with a mail order catalogue - they quoted an address which my mother had no knowledge of, and an account which she has no knowledge of - they had the right name but the wrong address, and when I rung them they would not tell me how they had got my mothers home tel. no - this was really puzzling - I rung the mail order firm to check any accounts at my mothers address and there was nothing.

I have since sent Moorcroft proof of my mother having been at her address for many years. As yet they have not responded but my mother is in a "bit of a state". Would really appreciate any advice with this - it is obvious that someone has used her name but not her address to get goods.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send Morcroft £1 statutory fee and ask for copy of original credit agreement. This will put things in dispute and tell them you ain't paying till they supply this. If they do not supply this take em to court no agreement no debt and check your credit rating to see what they have done to it. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, do not discuss any personal business over the 'phone. Chances are, you will be told any old rubbush that suits Moorcroft at the time.... which they will be very reluctant to put into print.

 

If your mother is sure that she has not had any catalogue debt, you could ignore it. However, as it is obviously worrying the both of you, my advice would be to send a CCA (Consumer Credit Act, 1974) request, enclosing a cheque for £1 (fee). Make sure that you keep the sentence "I do not acknowledge any debt to your company". Send it by Recorded Delivery and wait. They have 12 days from the date of signature to comply with your request... after that time the debt is unenforceable without going to court. A CCA will include both signatures; your mother's and the original creditor. If they cannot produce a CCA (because they don't have one !), then they cannot make your mother pay a thing.

 

The reason why it is important to say "I do not acknowledge any debt to your company" is because if your mother did have a debt and it is over 6 years old, it will be statute barred unless she acknowledges it in writing. Acknowledging a debt after this time re-starts the 6 year clock for collecting on it !

 

The CCA letter is in the Bank Templates section... Letter N, I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...