Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

greenranger v blackhorse


greenranger
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6284 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

prelim sent today to the wales office so to avoid my claim falling under scottish law.

_______________________________

 

yb *won* full amount plus costs plus interest.

llyods tsb *won* full amount plus costs plus interest.

_______________________________

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck, if you have already created a post about this claim then can you stick to that thread so that we can help you better. You will be fine, you are one stage closer.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

If this has helped, please click on the scales on the bottom left of this post and add to my reputation.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why in wales? I am in scotland as well and claiming against LTSB, i thought their registered address was in England!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been dealing with blackhorse now for three years and i have only ever had letters from scotland and wales?

will this claim be dealt with by llyods tsb solicitors?

_______________________________

 

yb *won* full amount plus costs plus interest.

llyods tsb *won* full amount plus costs plus interest.

_______________________________

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice would be to go for the London address, so it falls under English law giving you one extra year of charges to claim back for. Also doubt it will go to court, will probably settle out of court so no need to make the trip south of the border.

 

As far as I am aware Black Horse is part of the Lloyds TSB group, hence the English address!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice would be to go for the London address, so it falls under English law giving you one extra year of charges to claim back for. Also doubt it will go to court, will probably settle out of court so no need to make the trip south of the border.

 

As far as I am aware Black Horse is part of the Lloyds TSB group, hence the English address!!!

 

 

Hence the Black Horse too!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

I've been fighting Black Horse Ltd and I have found out some info I'd like everyone to know about, especially if in their case Black Horse Ltd supplied information about them on credit files such as late payments and defaults (NOT Court judgements they are entred by the Registry Trust.

until Novmber 2006, Black Horse Ltd were incorrectly registered a Data Processor with the ICO, that means they were committing a criminal offence for not telling the ICO of changes under section 20 of the Data Protection Act (notification of changes).

When a company obtains a license to process data they have to put their registered office address on the register which is Gresham Street London, but they registerd it as St Williams House Tresillion Terrace Cardiff ( until I made them change it.

So anyone who has had data processed by them up to November 2006 has a good case for unlawfull processing which is a breach of the Data Protection Act.

Everyone should write to Black horse with this info and demand they remove any defaults from their Credit files or face a court case which they will have a real good chance of winning and getting compensation also if they passed the info on to debt collectors that makes it even more ammo against them, they passed it on with a dodgy license to do so.

 

Sparkie 1723

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Greenranger

The Solicitors for Black Horse Ltd are Sechari Clark & Mitchell 116 Cockfosters rd Barnet EN4 ODY, telephone No 020 844 7717 and ask to be put through to Sechari Clark & Mitchell they are what they call "in House" solicitors

 

keep smiling

 

 

Sparkie1723

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

no reply from prelim.lba sent 23/01/07.

got a letter today asking me to call and when i did they say there was no reason for me to call. i raised the subject of my letters and they told me my account had been allocated to a manager and i should get a call soon.

sounds ominus!

_______________________________

 

yb *won* full amount plus costs plus interest.

llyods tsb *won* full amount plus costs plus interest.

_______________________________

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they want to settle they can pay you the money, no requirement for discussion.

 

As the 14 days after the issue of the LBA is just about to expire, just file the claim form with the court, I recommend that you do not use MCOL, easier to complete the N1 in hard copy and post.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

had a very amusing conversation with blackhorse. at some points i had to stop myself laughing but some how i managed.

 

i was ringing to confirm they had received my letters and got into a whole debate about their charges. they gave me the old you breached your agreement and incurred charges as per t&c. so i asked if there charges were fair etc and then they gave me an offer that they would apply no more charges to my account untill the end of the agreement if i paid on time every month and if i didnt persue my complaint any further.

 

they must of thought this was a good offer because the the nice lady on the phone seemed a little shocked when i refused and told her i would persue them through the courts if needs be for all charges that are deemed excessive and unlawful.

_______________________________

 

yb *won* full amount plus costs plus interest.

llyods tsb *won* full amount plus costs plus interest.

_______________________________

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...