Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ECP ANPR PCN - didn't use terminal- Hornsey Central Health Centre


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received the attached today.

The centre has free parking provided the number plate is entered on arrival at the surgery, which we forgot about.

Given it's another of these private companies, what would be the best route here

- ignore until letters either stop or court action threatened?

 

 

2024-02-24 ECP NTK for 2024-02-19 PCN.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to ECP ANPR PCN - didn't use terminal- Hornsey Central Health Centre

thread title updated pdf properly named

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Bazooka Boo said much of the PCN missing and it is the missing pieces that can help your case since the PCN is governed by the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 . If the wording does not comply,  you as keeper are not liable to pay the PCN. Even if you were the driver as Courts do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person it will be pretty hard to prove that you were the driver.

All it needs for you to know the whether the PCN is compliant is to post up the whole PCN front and back.

Edited by lookinforinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for not completing PDF/info correctly or posting the other side of the PCN. That is attached and below are answers:

1 Date of the infringement 12 Feb 2024

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 19 Feb 2024

[scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s

3 Date received 27 Feb 2024

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] YES

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? YES - just numberplates, not the car

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] NO

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up NA

7 Who is the parking company? ECP

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Hornsey Central Health Centre, London

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

BPA

 

2024-02-24 EPC NTK for pcn 2024--02-12.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you able to get some good (readable) photos of the signage? (Including the signage and system to enter details inside).

Also, is this a new parking scheme?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing is to let the surgery know that you didn't enter your car registrtaion when you visited and ask them to confirm to Euro that you were a patient on that day and Euro should cancel. The quicker you do that before matters escalate, the more lkely that they will cancel. You could suggest that  they put up a sign reminding drivers to enter their vrm.

thank you for posting the whole of the PCN which confirms that it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 in two ways. [2][e] of S9 states

(e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—

(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;

Your PCN does not. All it does is to ask the driver to pay which is not enough. In addition under [2][a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. Instead it gives the arrival and departure times of the car as it passes the ANPR cameras which is not the same.

That means that you as keeper are not liable to pay the PCN only the driver is now liable. Courts do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person so proving who was driving will be difficult for Euro.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, lookinforinfo said:

The first thing is to let the surgery know that you didn't enter your car registrtaion when you visited and ask them to confirm to Euro that you were a patient on that day and Euro should cancel. The quicker you do that before matters escalate, the more lkely that they will cancel.

Nail.  On.  Head.  Hit.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thinking out loud here......but.... if they are using the cameras to calculate the length of stay, then invoicing you for parking, how do they know if you parked or simply drove around the car park for an hour?

I know I'm nit picking, but you would have thought that they would get the terminology right?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This particular car park is pretty small Bazooka though I think one woman got off even though it took her 30 minutes to exit the car park because of the queue in front of her trying to get on the main road at peak time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all - GP said:

We are unable to write to Euro Car Parks as were are completely unrelated to them. It is dealt with by the Ground floor reception for Hornsey Central. We can confirm that you were seen On 12th February 2024 at 5:10pm and you may use the consultation below to fight your case. Unfortunately, there is nothing further that we can do or you.

Thanks, 
Queenswood Medical Practice

we will provide that proof (redacted) to the “ground floor reception for Hornsey central” to see if they can cancel the ticket with ECP.

Just kept name, date and address visible on the doc the gp provided or should I redact more in case they provide it to ECP?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would visit the ground floor reception with the letter from your GP and show them whatever they need to get the PCN cancelled.

If they are unhelpful find out who is the boss of that organisation and write to them complaining about  the extra proof needed to avoid a PCN with insufficient notices advising of the necessity to enter your vrm especially when you are not even visiting the company that brought in the parking company.

Explain that that particular proof that parking companies use is a scam since they know that not many  people abuse car parks so they make the bulk of their income from visitors who are entitled to be there but have not been advised to register  [for example you ] or have forgotten to register.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Reception said we needed to email ECP directly with roof of the appointment and they would def scrap the charge.

Seems this is my only option now, but I know it's not recommended to contact them as it admits "fault"?...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the obvious question is why reception don't get off their backsides themselves and cancel it, they were the ones who called ECP in.

No, there is no problem in contacting ECP as long as you don't tell them who the driver was

Before going any further and potentially ending up in a mess, an important question.  Was the person who had the appointment the same person who is the registered keeper of the car?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In that case do not write since you will then have to reveal your partner's name, effectively outing them as the driver which is the one thing you do not want to do.

As the keeper, you are in the clear since the PCN is non compliant.

Should it get to Court then you can say that your partner went in your car to the medical centre thus outing them there as the driver but by then it is too late for ECP to reissue a new PCN in your partner's name

and they have already named you as the driver and probably the keeper as well since they have no idea that their PCN was non compliant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking about writing but with a redacted proof of appointment, say with just the first letter of the person's first name showing.

There is no need for ECP to know the name of the patient, just that the person was a genuine patient.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a "Final noitication letter today.

I'll do a redacted copy of the proof of the medical appointment my partner had.

Question is

- can I do this via the official ECP appeals process?

Or just write a letter to the address on the PCN with redacted proof enclosed?

WWW.EUROCARPARKS.COM

Feel you have been wrongly served a parking charge? You can appeal a Euro Car Parks parking charge here.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd hold until/unless you ever get a letter of claim.

On 22/03/2024 at 18:39, lookinforinfo said:

In that case do not write since you will then have to reveal your partner's name, effectively outing them as the driver which is the one thing you do not want to do.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But as long as my partner's name is redacted what's the issue in asking them to to cancel based on that proof?

Link to post
Share on other sites

see what the experts conclude.

it might be a case of as you say simply obscuring the patients name .

it could also be interesting to use the term 'the driver or their passenger was the patient at Hornsey Central Medical Centre'

just musing.

however this MUST be done in WRITING ONLY

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...