Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Shoes SPC Claim Forfar Sheriff Court - Old Newday Credit Card.


Recommended Posts

Yes. 
A4 forms i uploaded do 100% match the papers that arrived in post. 
 

It is what I need to insert in boxes D1-D5 that I can’t find/unsure of. 

It may be right under my nose but I can’t seem to find it. 
 

ucm

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UsedCarMan said:

A4 forms i uploaded do 100% match the papers that arrived in post. 

that is not what i am asking....please read what i am asking above carefully....

do the ONLINE WEBSITE RESPONSE QUESTIONs+NUMBERs (NOT THE PDF'S) match form 4a pdf Qs+No's???

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great thank you .. got there in the end.

the only D section you fill will be D1.

i'll be updating this sticky:

What To Do - Simple Procedure Rule Claims Scotland updated 2024 - Scotland Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group

later tonight, probably in the early hours, it will be ready for you to use in the morning, 

1 final question , under d1 it says, you can use a sep sheet if not enough room (there wont be enough!) , i will gather there is a portal stated on the website by d1 to do so?

do they state a format to use like pdf or doc(x)? and are there instructions upon how you must name such uploads ..ie claim number , claimant/defendant, court name, date?

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

i have updated the response sticky now.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/402263-what-to-do-simple-procedure-rule-claims-scotland-updated-2024/

in your case...where it states in the response to a credit card claim

The court will be aware that penalty charges

enter before that line/paragraph this addition paragraph:

......................starts.......

The Claimant in their form 3a Section E4 hereby stated:

5. It was a term of said agreement that a failure to meet any payment on a due date would render the account in default and would entitle the claimant to serve a notice of default on the respondent requiring the respondent to remedy the breach within 14 days failing which the agreement would be terminated. 

 

6. On or around 31/07/2020 the respondent failed to make a payment of a sum which had fallen due and the said account entered into default. A default Notice was issued to the respondent on 31/07/2020.

7. The respondent failed to remedy the default following upon service of the said notice and the account was accordingly terminated in accordance with that notice. The account remains in default.

The Claimant could not have issued a default notice to the respondent on said date of 31/07/2020.

As in box E1 Section 2 the Claimant clearly states:

2. By virtue of a debt purchase agreement (“the agreement “) between the claimants and NewDay Ltd. (“the original owner”) dated 23/10/2020.

Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 only the Owner of a debt can issue a Default Notice.

The claimant by their own admission did not own the debt until 23/10/2020.

.......ends..........

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont attach it to any/the response form.

you are filing your defence ONLINE at that site i indicated.

click the blue link at the bottom - start now.

upload/attach it as a PDF 

send the CCA request to Lowell today.

i purposefully have not recommended it to date as it tips them off upon how your are going to defend if sent before filing your response.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Final question before I hit “submit” to the court.

Looking for your confirmation as I don’t want a last minute mistake 
 

1. Cut & pasted a pdf starting with this paragraph : 

As a respondent I specifically make reference to the Simple Procedure Rules 2016 in so far as my understanding is that:

2. Inserted the paragraph as you said in #31 just above this line The court will be aware that penalty charges

This is now attached as pdf on the court response portal. 
I think I am good to submit but just double checking 

Also a CCA request was sent today  

thank you again 

 

ucm

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks all ok.

dont worry too much.

the clerk will contact you if there are any issues.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good afternoon 

Update from the Sheriff via the portal today. 

What do I post on here next?

I would assume just the body of the response only,  leaving out the header ?

thanks 

UCM
 

………..

Link to post
Share on other sites

his orders.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the order. 
……..
The respondent has indicated to the court that this claim will be disputed.


The sheriff has considered the claim form and the response form and has given the following orders:

The claimant is ordered to lodge and intimate the following no later than 19 April 2024:

  • - signed Consumer Credit Agreement;
  • - notice of assignation;
  • - default notice issued by the original creditor; and
  • - detailed statement of the account and how, with specific reference to additional interest added because of late / no payment, and any additional penalty fees or interest added, that has resulted in the balance now claimed.

Settlement and negotiation

The claimant and the respondent are encouraged to contact each other to seek to settle the case or to narrow the issues in dispute, before the case management discussion.

If the case is settled before the case management discussion date then the claimant must send an Additional Orders Application to the court immediately telling the court what should happen next in the case (for example, to cancel the case management discussion and dismiss the case)


Case management discussion

The sheriff would like to discuss this case with both parties. Both parties are therefore ordered to attend a case management discussion in the sheriff court.

The purpose of a case management discussion is to allow the sheriff to discuss the claim and response with both parties and to clarify any concerns which the sheriff has.

At the case management discussion, the sheriff will also discuss with both parties their attitudes to negotiation and alternative dispute resolution.

At the case management discussion, the sheriff may give both parties orders in person arranging a hearing at which the case will be considered and their dispute resolved.

The sheriff may make a decision at a case management discussion.

Date
Both parties are ordered to attend the case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx.

At the case management discussion, the sheriff expects both parties to be prepared to discuss the case and to have an open and constructive attitude to the possibility of negotiation or alternative dispute resolution.


Signed by: Sheriff 

……..

thanks

ucm

Link to post
Share on other sites

smart guy this Forfar Sheriff, 

i know Emma the clerk well...

seen off 2 nolans claims for people there.

good its webex too!

moved into the 22nd century at last.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got a letter back from the Glasgow office collections agency saying they have received a request for a copy of the CCA.  They say they have raised this with Lowell and once received they will issue in post. 
 

I posted this to Lowell Leeds office. Just wondering how this has appeared there with them  


Also I note from their letter that the balance is higher than stated on the claim. 
 

thanks

UCM

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh?

3 hours ago, UsedCarMan said:

Glasgow office collections agency

thats weird.

scan up the letter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

obv i'm aware of walkerlove but more in their role whereby most Scottish court claims are delivered by hand, by sheriff officers.

though it's not unsurprising they have a DCA role, i was not aware not can i find, a link to the lowell group.

this is also the 1st scottish claim by lowells we've ever seen

so there we go.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello

email received from Shoosmiths today with evidence that they have lodged to court. Quite a few pages (over 100) attached to it. 

how do I attach and forward here ?
 

thanks 

UCM 

Link to post
Share on other sites

read upload CAREFULLY

one mass PDF if poss ONLY. use the stated websites

we dont need statements.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these the important pages I need to upload ?

1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a

2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement 

3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20

4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20

5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20

I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see  

( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets)

just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required

thank you 

UCM

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont need statements. nor std info sheets.

EVERTHING else 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DN is ok

DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it.

agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really?? 

but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used.

if the date is correct then poss ok,

it that your correct address for that time of take out?

but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs.

the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4.

a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included.

failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too?
dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Address was correct at the time of take out

The time of esign is strange (at church on Sunday ) as is no the no name/tickbox/ip address etc. 

There are 2 pages of T&Cs but no name/address showing on them. These two pages show paragraphs which are not in order, different font and appear in landscape form. Looks different font to CCA pages and with no numbers/references on these pages

UCM



 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...