Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can be sure that pardoning himself, stopping the other prosecutions and vengeance will be his first priorities if he wins. i dont think he will win, but no surety on that
    • The other cases aren't going to happen before November though, are they? Reporters are saying he can't pardon himself for a state conviction. He would have to lean on the governor of New York state, as I understand it.
    • I am requesting your assistance to how I should go about a serious breach of my privacy that occurred during my stay at one of IHG’s hotel on Ma 2023. Having previously had items taken from my hotel room elsewhere I take the added precaution of using a security camera app on my device whenever I stay in a hotel room. The recordings are date and time stamped and it cannot be adjusted by the end user.   On this particular occasion I discovered evidence from my personal security camera recordings of a spy camera had been placed underneath my door, and can be seen moving along the base of the door for approximately 15 seconds.   The spy camera is in fact marketed as an inspection device of drains primarily but is known to be used in observing spaces difficult to enter. It is a usb endoscopic camera that has a length flexible cable that is semi rigid and can negotiate any obstruction by bending. The operator can be up to 3-4 metres away.   Infuriated as I had previously stayed with them in 2022 for 3 months at £260 per night that they would seek to question my honesty and invade my privacy. I immediately called reception and asked why they would do such a thing and if they had any concerns they were welcome to inspect my room and go through my personal belongings and ask me anything they wanted to. I was sleeping for the best part of my stay and was alone throughout.   I sent the recordings to the receptionist within the hour of finding them and I asked to speak to the manager of the hotel who I was told wasn’t present. I tried to have face to face meetings with him but he instead wrote to me denying the recordings were made at their hotel stating that they didn’t observe anyone in the corridor at the time of the recordings and that they don’t have a metal bar at the interface of the tile and carpet which corresponds to the overlying door. I rejected that statement on the grounds the video doesn’t show a bar but a reflection of light on the tile and you wouldn’t see a person outside my door because the cable is black and runs along the floor. If you don’t look for this you won’t see it. The matter was passed up to the area manager and he also denied the allegation. This is where the matter ends as far as IHG are concerned. Leading a busy work and family life I let the matter go but I found myself back at the same hotel a year later. I booked for  2 nights and was given a room facing the lobby door that led to the lifts. Unfortunately, from the hours of 3am I was woken up by the noise of the door opening and closing but also noticed shadows of a person standing in front of my door. At first I took no notice and put this down to a guest waiting for someone but the person or persons returned several times, standing outside my door for up to several minutes. I called the hotel reception and asked if there was an issue  on my floor and they said they would come up to check. They never said they would check the CCTV and as the incidents continued to happen up to 8am I called them 6 times. Given my past experience I didn’t think they took security as serious a# her establishments and made them observe the Cctv and let me know. The explanation I was given was that they could see residents there but they were heading down to breakfast. The time that I had noticed these feet by door was from 3am and breakfast started at 6.30am. It also didn’t explain why they would stand by my door for anything longer than 10seconds and if they were waiting for someone how likely is it that this scenario is played out 6 times when there was only 12 rooms per floor. Later that morning when I went down for breakfast the manager said he would move me to a room at the end of the corridor and asked me what my plans were for the day, essentially when would I be in the hotel. I stated that for the day I was out. He then said that all his staff were uncomfortable about me being a guest and said that I was not welcome there anymore. I had paid for the two nights but when it came to the end of the day I didn’t feel that I would be able to rest at the hotel given the hostility so I returned the next day to collect my remaining belongings, namely items of clothing, an iPhone charging cable and plug, and toiletries. Checkout was at 2pm and I was at the hotel at 3pm. All my belongings were gone and they couldn’t locate the items.  I plan to report the incident of the spy camera to the police, as well as the theft, and write to the hotel emphasising that this breach of privacy is unacceptable and the hotel's failure to properly investigate and address the issue is deeply concerning. The fact that I requested security checks to ensure my safety in the early hours was reasonable, yet their response to ban from the premises was excessive and even possibly discriminatory as I had revealed to them that I had been a victim of a hate crime given my sexuality. . I am seeking compensation for the infringement of my privacy, the lack of proper investigation, and the being humiliated and made to feel like an undesirable. I will request a full refund of my two-night stay totaling £390. Additionally, I will request compensation for the cost of my previous stay when the infringement occurred, which was £220. I am also considering damages for the infringement of my privacy but at a loss as to what this would equate to. I will close the letter giving them a 14 day timeframe to respond.    Is there anything you feel i need to consider here? Many thanks   
    • oF course, this is all just the start. trump is dragging it out as much as possible hoping to pardon himself, but the barrier the yanks had about admitting that a pres could be such a piece of err work has been broken and there is many more to come. His current criminal charges are extremely unlikely to result in jail time or anything other than fines  - but with some of the other charges - jail is pretty much mandatory - especially for one not only not on a first offense - but with others stacked up
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Big Motoring World Kent - PX'd my car - new vehicle has serious non reported frontend accident damage impacting engine - paid by debit Card.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 95 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, 

Purchase a car from Big Motoring World on 28/01/24 with part exchange. Car had complete MOT etc. Paid via debit card £14,899 and seemingly fine on test drive and drive home to Essex from Kent.

As precaution I took the car into our local garage today 30/01/24 and they called within the hour to say that even before being up on the ramps they can tell that the car has been in a serious accident that has crashed the front that has impacted the engine and upon looking at previous MOTs prior to the current one there are a number of advisories that seemingly have just disappeared from the most recent one.

The garage advised that could be 3-5k worth to repair but to simply return it and get rid. Meanwhile the garage has the car currently and are going over it with a fine tooth comb and noting and recording all the problems.

I’ve seen various posts about claiming a refund from BMW in writing and via email.
 

My question is do I drive the car back to them and sit there until they refund?

Do I need to also call BMW? My garage advised not to fix but simply get rid.

Do I start a charge back with my bank immediately or do I have to wait for BMW to acknowledge the letter that I will send via recorded delivery and email?

 

Many thanks in advance 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start taking immediate action.

Get the findings of the garage you took it to in writing.

Write BMW a letter rejecting the vehicle and demanding a refund.

Take the vehicle back and leave it there.

Begin a chargeback process.

If you don't get your refund within 14 days maximum then we will help you begin a legal action.

In the meantime, please take photographs of it including the registration number so we can publicise it can order to possibly protect other people who might think about buying the same vehicle and who happened to chance on this website.

If you have a copy of the advertisement then that will also be very useful. Please post it here

It would also be helpful if you could obtain a written opinion from your garage as to whether or not it is roadworthy and if not, in what respect might it fail an MOT

Also, see if you can get photographs of the areas which the garage considers have been damaged

Before you take it back, you should photograph everything. Including extra keys etc.

You should take copies of any documents v5 etc.

And then make sure that they are all safely returned in an envelope and give it by hand to somebody at the BMW garage.

If they refuse it then leave it on their desk. Don't take any nonsense. Leave the car there and leave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. 
Original advert for the car was taken down as soon as we paid, however, once I have all the paperwork from the garage and state of play I will upload pics and other bits to protect others.

Just been to our garage and they will provide the report tomorrow along with photographs and video. They need to double check the engine number matches what is recorded from new to ensure a different engine hasn’t been dropped in.

I don’t know exactly the issues apart from a knocking noise from the engine and something to do with the sump, but they seem adamant that it’s not viable to be fixed and there’s damage to the engine.

In terms of chargeback, do I need to provide the bank with evidence that I have requested a refund from BMW?

With driving the car back to BMW, do I have to evidence that I have sent them the email/hard copy through post etc requesting refund before leaving the car on their premises?

And finally (apologies) what happens with the fact that I part exchanged our car for this new one that then came off the original cost of the car (original cost £15,800), was given £1,000 for our car.

Many thanks for your advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Faulty car from Big Motoring World - paid by Debit Card.

just phone your bank and do a chargeback.

is your PX car still there? 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PX'd my car for a now Faulty car from Big Motoring World - paid by Debit Card.

Hi, 

Just as an update,

the garage completed their extensive checks on the vehicle yesterday to the sum of £192 in labour.

The car was re MOT and passed but they are saying it has at last 20+ issues with the main one being the engine.

In short their opinion is that the car had been in a front end crash that had not be recorded with any insurance companies.

The oil sump was damage and the car had been run without oil for a period of time causing internal damage which is where the noise is coming from.

They couldn’t establish if it’s the engine from new as it would need stripping down to verify and that in turn could then allow BMW to say they car has been tamper with.  

Its had work and parts done that aren’t seen on a car with low mileage and the sump has been remove and revealed with incorrect sealant and every bolt has been removed and refitted leaving marks on the bolts.  The list goes on tbh.

I contacted my bank for a chargeback but have been told I can’t do that until BMW have given a view on what their course of action is on whether they will refund or not. 

We don’t yet have the V5 document from DVLA so I don’t know where I stand sending a letter requesting refund and refusing the vehicle?

My husband is calling BMW now on a recorded line to get their view on a refund.

Is there something different I need to say in my letter to BMW as it’s within the 14 days of purchase rather than 30 days as seems to be the more common period with others disputing with BMW.

any other guidance would be greatly appreciated.

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Big Motoring World Kent - PX'd my car - new vehicle has serious non reported frontend accident damage impacting engine - paid by debit Card.

as you test drove the car the 14 days under consumer contract law does not apply.

however your 30 days under the consumer rights act - as not fit for purpose - does.

you can reject the car and demand a full refund.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing! Thank you, good to understand what I’m stipulating in my email.

My husband has registered the issue with BMW and we’ve been told we would get a call back in 48 hours - the wait begins.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you record every call that you have from this company.

However, don't make any promises or commitments back to them or promise to take the car back for repairs or anything until you have checked it out with us.

A very common scenario is that they ask for the car to be taken back for a diagnostic check. They then go ahead and say that they have carried out repairs and that you have no further rights..

You should send a letter of rejection immediately and make it clear that even if they want to carry out checks, they should not consider this as overriding your rejection.

Tell them that if you resile from your rejection that this must be in writing from you.

Send this in writing straight away before you have any phone calls and on the phone make sure that you're refer to that and stand by this position.

From the stories we hear, they will manipulate or misinterpret or mislead.

You should make sure that everything is clear in writing

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response.
I can get a letter out to them today with copies of all the report pictures etc but I don’t have the V5 and they would not get the letter until tomorrow at earliest.

I’ll attach a copy of my letter 

 

Here is the draft so far...

Dear Big Motoring World,

I am writing to formally assert my rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 regarding the car that I purchased from your dealership on 28/02/2024, for which I paid £14,799.

Within the initial 30 days of ownership, a significant defect has materialised in the vehicle, specifically related to its engine, along with a multitude of other defects.

The initial test drive of the vehicle on 27/01/2024 seemed to show no alarming issues, however, following the drive home once purchased, we noticed a knocking noise while the car was idle but then more alarmingly when revved. We immediately booked the car into our local registered garage,  where our other cars receive their service and MOTs.  Within the hour of the newly purchased car being with the garage, we were told that it should be returned to the dealership and should not be driven further.

The car was then with the garage a further 24 hours for a full inspection, diagnostic checks and MOT. Upon completion, their professional advice was to have the dealership collect it for return to their premises as it should not be driven. This incurred additional personal expense to me to the sum of £192.00.

Under the provisions of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, it is explicitly stated that goods must be accurately described, fit for their intended purpose, and of satisfactory quality. Given that your dealership is in breach of this contractual obligation, and considering that the defective engine and substantial issues in the car have been detected within the first 30 days of ownership, I therefore am rejecting the car and requesting a full refund in accordance with my statutory rights.  Should you wish to perform your own checks on the vehicle, do not consider this to override my rights to reject the vehicle. If I should decide to resile from my rejection of the vehicle then I would put this in writing to that effect.

Therefore, I kindly request that you provide a prompt response within 14 days, clearly outlining the process for receiving a refund and the arrangements for facilitating the return of the vehicle.

Additionally, I expect Big Motoring World to take full responsibility for coordinating the return of the vehicle. In the event that any expenses are incurred by me during this process, I anticipate that Big Motoring World will promptly reimburse me.

I trust that you will handle this matter with the seriousness it deserves, acknowledging my rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, and promptly addressing the refund and return of the vehicle in accordance with the law.

Yours sincerely,


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good letter but you didn't warn them that if they carried out their own inspection you would not resile from your rejection.

If they offer you a diagnosis as they surely will do cover make sure that you put this point in writing.

It is essential. We have seen cases where they carry out then own diagnosis and then say that they were given permission to repair and that the rejection was withdrawn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I did revise after your last message and it now reads as follows...

 

Dear Big Motoring World,

I am writing to formally assert my rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 regarding the car that I purchased from your dealership on 28/02/2024, for which I paid £14,799.

Within the initial 30 days of ownership, a significant defect has materialised in the vehicle, specifically related to its engine, along with a multitude of other defects.

The initial test drive of the vehicle on 27/01/2024 seemed to show no alarming issues, however, following the drive home once purchased, we noticed a knocking noise while the car was idle but then more alarmingly when revved. We immediately booked the car into our local registered garage,  where our other cars receive their service and MOTs.  Within the hour of the newly purchased car being with the garage, we were told that it should be returned to the dealership and should not be driven further.

The car was then with the garage a further 24 hours for a full inspection, diagnostic checks and MOT. Upon completion, their professional advice was to have the dealership collect it for return to their premises as it should not be driven. This inspection and full diagnostic review incurred additional personal expense to me to the sum of £192.00.

Under the provisions of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, it is explicitly stated that goods must be accurately described, fit for their intended purpose, and of satisfactory quality. Given that your dealership is in breach of this contractual obligation, and considering that the defective engine and substantial issues in the car have been detected within the first 30 days of ownership, I therefore am rejecting the car and requesting a full refund in accordance with my statutory rights.  Should you wish to perform your own checks on the vehicle, do not consider this to override my rights to reject the vehicle. If I should decide to resile from my rejection of the vehicle then I would put this in writing to that effect.

Therefore, I kindly request that you provide a prompt response within 14 days, clearly outlining the process for receiving a refund and the arrangements for facilitating the return of the vehicle.

Additionally, I expect Big Motoring World to take full responsibility for coordinating the return of the vehicle. In the event that any expenses are incurred by me during this process, I anticipate that Big Motoring World will promptly reimburse me.

I trust that you will handle this matter with the seriousness it deserves, acknowledging my rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, and promptly addressing the refund and return of the vehicle in accordance with the law.

Yours sincerely,


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont forget to send it via a post office and get a free proof of posting. 1st class stamp is all thats needed.

the V5C is not your problem.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit too much kindly and a bit too much trust but other than that it's fine

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noted on the kindness...have removed that.

 Otherwise am I missing anything that needs to be added or included in the envelope aside from our garage report, photos of damage, copy of past MOTs listing previous fail and advisories (our garage report also talks to the fact of timing between MOTs when its likely it was off-road).

Many thanks for your help. I intend to post recorded and signed for to both the head office and the office for complaints, as well as by email to the complaints department.

Is that enough?

Quick question on my car that was part exchanged.

Presumably its already gone to auction or a breakers, what do I do/ask about reimbursement of that vehicle/amount that I received towards the full purchase price. 

The new car was purchased for £15,500 (with 299 admin fee on top). Our part ex was £1000

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

When it is eventually settled – you will get your cash money back plus the part exchange car or else its value.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit of an update for anyone who is interested. 

Today I sent the letter, along with the garage report, full diagnostic report and copy of the previous MOTs. I also included the invoice for the full inspection we had on the car so they can see it went in on 31/01/2024.

 I've sent a copy to the BMW complaints address and their registered office address - both sent recorded and signed for.

 Letter has been scanned in and I'll now be sending that via email to their complaints email, along with referencing the call my husband made to the complaints line yesterday.

The V5 arrived today so will make copies of that and the keys as advised and will take pics of the car to post on here.

I have photos from the garage but there are around 34 and without an explanation for each it would be hard include in what I already sent.  Also think the garage have had enough as I spent 1.5 hours yesterday while the mechanic typed out the report in lament terms of what the defects in the diagnostic meant.

We are meant to hear from BMW within 48 hours of the call my husband made yesterday.

I guess its just a waiting game now.

Thank you for all your advice and guidance

Just a further point I forgot..

.my bank (Barclays) would not allow a chargeback to be started as they said we have to have been told by BMW that they will not refund.

Another thing to wait on, however, as soon as we hear from them with excuses and requests to repair, then I should be able to get the charge back raised.

 
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly I would tell the bank that BMW had refused and would not put it in writing.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did think of that but annoyingly the lady wanted dates and details of phone call refusal or written, so I was a bit stumped. Once we get that phone call from BMW I'll get back on to the bank. Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Newest update....

BMW received our email, which had included a copy of the written request for a refund.  

Surprise surprise, they want to fix the car.

No mention of a refund.

Clearly they have not read the letter properly or the accompanying garage report saying that the car should not be driven.

 Any advice on my next steps?

Here is the response to our letter requesting our refund under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.

Quote

"Good Morning.

Thank you for your email dated 02/02/24 and for your patience while we’ve been investigating your complaint.

I am writing to let you know that we’ve completed our review of your recent complaint and this email is our response in relation to your complaint.

Your complaint

My understanding of your complaint is below:

You are experiencing concerns with your vehicle.

My findings

We apologise to hear of the concerns that you have advised us of.

We are able to get you booked into one of our service centres, in order to offer you a repair.

Our service centres are below:

Snodland (ME6 5SL)

Peterborough (PE1 5YB)

Cannock (WS11 1SL)

Leeds (LS27 0TS)

Next steps

If you would like me to finalise an appointment an one of our service centres, please let me know.

Kindest Regards,

 

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 02/02/2024 at 15:28, Mumwhoruns said:

my bank (Barclays) would not allow a chargeback to be started as they said we have to have been told by BMW that they will not refund.

Another thing to wait on, however, as soon as we hear from them with excuses and requests to repair, then I should be able to get the charge back raised.

off you go.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though BMW have not explicitly stated they won't refund? 

What should I respond to BMW...

should it be along the lines of "as stated previously in my email and our letter, our garage has said the car should not be driven and damage is too extensive for repair.

As such I am exercising my right to a refund under the Consumer Rights act 2015 and await details from you on the process for receiving payment' ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would ignore that from BMW for now.

go for the chargeback.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chargeback has been filed this afternoon.

Should I now respond to BMW reiterating the status of the car and reminding them of my request for a refund? That way there is paper trail and also evidence that I have been responsive to their efforts to resolve the situation?

Edited by Mumwhoruns
Further info added
Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

i would ignore that from BMW for now.

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...