Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. You contacted directly with the parcel broker so your best option is to proceed directly against them for breach of contract. I hope you have read enough to understand that you will not be able to rely on the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Do you understand why? Have Parcel to Go giving you a reason for declining reimbursement? Do you have anything in writing from your customer which shows that they did not refuse delivery and which identifies the actual circumstances of the situation?
    • Which Court have you received the claim from?  CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE, NORTHAMPTON Name of the Claimant?  LOWELL PORTFOLIO LTD How many defendant's joint or self?  SELF Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  03 MAY 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £6000 DUE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER AN AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 FOR A LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC ACCOUNT WITH AN ACCOUNT REFERENCE OF (ACCOUNT NO. 16 DIGITS LONG). THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT AND A DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UNDER S.87(1) OF THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH. THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON (DATE) NOVEEMBER 2016 NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT. THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUORY INTEREST UNDER S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FOR THE DATE PF ASSIGNMENT TO THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUMBE OF £0.00. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE SUM OF £6000. What is the total value of the claim? £6500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? YES, NOTICES OF CLAIM.  Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  YES  Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  NO Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  CREDIT CARD When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007?  BEFORE   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post?  I DONT RECALL   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  NO   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  DEBT PURCHASER.   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? THE FIRST I RECALL WAS A LETTER FROM LOWELL SAYING THEY NOW OWNED THE DEBT.  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  NOT THAT I RECALL OR BEEN PROVIDED WITH THROUGH CCA REQUESTS.AT LAST REQUEST THEY SAID THEY WERE AWAITING THE DEFAULT NOTICE AND NO ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN UNTIL RESPONDED WHICH TO DATE I'VE NOT HAD OR SEEN.  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  NO, I RECEIEVED LETTERS OF CLAIMS   Why did you cease payments?  I WAS UNDER MEDICAL CARE WHICH CAUSED ME NOT TO WORK. AROUND THAT TIME LOWELL HAD WANTED ME TO INCREASE MY PAYMENTS AS IT WOULD TAKE TOO LONG TO CLEAR THE DEBT. I HAD BEEN PAYING THEM WHAT I WAS PAYING THE BANK. I EXPLAINED MY THEN HEALTH & FINANCIAL POSITION AND THAT I WAS UNABLE TO DO SO. THEY PUT A HOLD ON MY ACCOUNT FOR A FEW MONTHS SO I CANCELLED MY DIRECT DEBIT. I MADE A FULL AND FINAL OFFER WHICH WAS REJECTED. WHEN THEY WANTED PAYMENTS TO RESUME I EXPLAINED I WAS IN A WORSE FINANCIAL POSITION, STILL UNDERTAKING TREATMENT AND NOW UNEMPLOYED SO COULD NOT START PAYMENTS AS THEY WANTED. AFTER SENDING MY FINANCIAL SPREADSHEET THEY KEPT SENDING LETTERS ASKING WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO. I COULDN’T SEE A WAY FORWARD I FELT STREESSED AND UNDER PRESSURE SO WROTE THAT I WOULD NOT BE CORRESPONDING WITH THEM ANYMORE.    What was the date of your last payment? NOVEMBER / DECEMBER 2018   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I COMMUNICATED MY FINANCIAL PROBLEMS WITH THE CREDIT CARD COMPANY, WE MADE A MONTHLY PAYMENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS KEPT FOR SEVERAL YEARS UNTIL DEBT WAS SOLD.  
    • Perhaps you would care to read this and reflect on your continuing comparison of Israel to Nazi Germany Jugg    ALEX BRUMMER: How grotesque of pro-Palestine protesters to besmirch Auschwitz, the place where my grandparents died WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK As the son of a refugee from the horrors of the Holocaust, I can feel nothing but contempt for the ignorance, gross... My elderly aunt Sussie and cousin Sheindy had been teenagers at Auschwitz and Belsen but survived and are alive to this day. What they will make of the protesters who waved flags, heckled and chanted as Israelis took part in the March Of The Living – the annual walk from Auschwitz to Birkenau – I cannot imagine. The images now circulating of the protesters are indescribably disturbing. They can only bring back memories of those final moments Sheindy shared with my grandparents when my grandmother Fanya squeezed her hand and told her to lie about her age to avoid the gas chambers. Claiming she was older, and could work, meant that Sheindy lived, not died. The outrage perpetrated by Hamas on October 7 has brought back the most terrifying memories for these two women – memories of pillage, mutilation and starvation. The Holocaust, or Shoah to use the Hebrew word, was the deliberate, industrial-scale killing of Jews.  It is bad enough that pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas sympathisers have chosen to steal the language of the Holocaust.  Any comparison between Israel's retaliation and the monstrous genocide of the 1940s is odious and anti-Semitic
    • Thank you JK2054 and BankFodder for your replies. The information requested is as follows:   My wife and I are sole traders supplying bespoke, handmade wedding trays and other items through our website. We do not sell on ebay. We had an order for two trays (invoice value £370) that were shipped on Monday 25th March. We used P2G as the broker and Evri as the shipper. We declared the value but did not take out insurance. As the trays were a present for a wedding on Saturday 30th March we checked the progress of delivery on the Thursday to see that there had been an attempt to deliver on the 27th but the driver failed to deliver as the customer’s gate was shut (customer informs us that the gates are open between 7am-7pm. We contacted the customer who informed us she had been waiting in all week and there had been no attempt of a delivery. Evri allege they attempted to deliver on the 28th & 29th. On the P2G web site on the 4th April at 14.17 it stated that the customer refused delivery. At 14.28 it updated to say there was a problem with the address and at 14.32 updated to say the customer had refused delivery. At 14.35 updated again to say it was being returned. Last entry was on the 7th April that it was being processed at the depot. We never received it. I have had six web chats with P2G between the 4th-30th April. On the 26th April, I had an offer of £20 plus cost of delivery (£6.72) from P2G which I rejected. During this time, I also contacted Evri that resulted in an email from Evri Customer Services (20th April) stating that they had lost the parcel. I replied requesting details of the attempted delivery but received no reply. After emailing Evri again on the 23rd asking again for the information I received a phone call from someone called Haleemah on the 25th who apologised and promised to send an email with a link to submit a claim form. I subsequently received an email with the link which only took me to a page that stated “Page not found”. After informing Evri customer services of the problem (to which no reply was forthcoming) a couple of days later I retried the link but it only took me to the Evri website. I believe that I have a good case against both companies but would appreciate guidance on which path to go down. I have read most of the information on this site, which has been very helpful and much appreciated, particularly the various court transcripts. I appreciate that this process is a marathon and not a sprint and am fully aware that I need to get everything in the correct order before starting on the legal road. I am sure this covers the current position but if further info is needed please let me know.  
    • Everything at small claims revolves around informality and common sense, there are no "special" ways to have to do things. The site manager's WS will be like yours and the one I linked to - just much shorter.  There need to be the introductory hearings about the case, the parties, etc., and the concluding Statement of Truth. In the middle just a couple of paragraphs where they say who they are, how they know you, and about permission being given by the landowner to use the car park. Superb.  I've added another section about the signage to the suggested WS sections three posts above. Yes, it's perfectly possible.  It'd be a good idea to phone the court on the 18th to see if they have paid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fraudulent Misrepresentation + Judicial Collusion = illegal eviction today at 8am!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts


 

I want to provide you with a comprehensive overview of the circumstances surrounding a horrific experience in relation to my tenancy agreement, disrepairs, negligence, discrimination, harassment, exploitation of prostitution, possible collusion with authorities and an illegal eviction process coming from a third party I have never met before, nor have any contractual obligations with but still managed to make my life a living hell, to the point of knowingly compromising my health taking me to situation of real threat to my life.

As an asylum seeker currently facing an imminent threat of homelessness. I bring to your attention the severe implications this poses to my health and general well being, especially considering my status as an individual diagnosed with HIV infection, recognized as a disability under the Equality Act 2010

I would like to draw your attention to several irregularities in the eviction process that warrant urgent review:

a. **Misidentification of the Landlord:**

The eviction notice was pursued by Company B ltd, a different entity from the one named in my tenancy agreement (Company A ltd.), and giving me physical possession of the premises in the first place; nor is referred granting rights or administrative powers. Copy of the tenancy agreement also copy of their register at Companies House to prove they are 2 different entities, they even have different parent company (person of significant control) . Also I have a Demand of Rent sent to me by tne Letting agency where undoubtably mention acting on behalf of Company A Ltd, Also in the bundle of necessary legal documentation, The Privacy Notice clearly states its the same Company A Ltd the controller of my personal data. 

Also there is breach of contract, due to a fraudulent misrepresentation regarding the falsely named landlord in the tenancy agreement. The illegal acquisition and sharing of my personal data by these two companies have severe legal ramifications, particularly concerning the eviction process initiated against me. The entire eviction process becomes void and invalid since it originated from an illegal acquisition and processing of my personal data. And on the Fire Safety Procedures it is stated is Company C Limited (a 3rd participant in this charade) the landlord of my building and responsible for running those fire safety procedures. The saddest thing is the County Court failing to recognize this great procedural mistakes. 
 

- **Legal Grounds:**

According to Section 44 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, I have the right to be given the correct name and address of my landlord, also the landlord's correct identification is a statutory requirement in eviction proceedings, and any discrepancy raises questions about the validity of the entire process.

The Misrepresentation Act 1967 is a statutory framework in the UK that addresses various types of misrepresentation. It allows for remedies such as rescission and damages in cases of innocent, negligent, or fraudulent misrepresentation
 

b. **Breaching Visa Regulations:**

I was provided with a 3-year contract while still under a tourist visa, unknowingly engaging in an illicit act. But they did know, that is their purpose of business. Now, having a wider understanding of UK law, it looks like they did this intentionally, knowing they could have evicted me without a proper eviction process, using in their favour, provisions found in the Immigration Act 2014, which possibly constitutes fraudulent misrepresentation.

Just after one year in the flat, when the market post-covid picked up, i got a communication form the managing agency. Where she is asking for my right to rent or shared code to run the search, at that point I became aware of that requirement. I gave the shared code and she ran the search, under Company A Ltd's name (as it is this company who i gave permission to use my personal data), finding to their surprise,, at that point I had right to rent, coincidentally a few weeks after I was served the first eviction notice, arising suspicions of a premeditated act signing the contract under the believe they will be able to get out of it easily using the aforementioned provisions, and expedite the eviction without the formalities required by the habitual protocol.

- **Legal Grounds:**

The Immigration Act 2014 regulates right to rent, and the landlord's duty to do periodic searches on the migratory status of their tenants. Tthe breach of visa regulations can have implications on the validity of the tenancy agreement and subsequent eviction proceedings, or criminal prosecution

The Misrepresentation Act 1967 is a statutory framework in the UK that addresses various types of misrepresentation. It allows for remedies such as rescission and damages in cases of innocent, negligent, or fraudulent misrepresentation
 

c. **Failure to Provide Essential Documentation:**

As we all know, the eviction notice under Section 21 requires strict adherence to protocol, including the provision of necessary documentation. The documents provided did not mention the name of the party pursuing the eviction, invalidating the process. The documents I got were sent in an email from Andrea Wasem at the letting agency Tavistock Bow, in that bundle I found the Privacy Notice naming Company A  Ltd, as the entity accountable of my personal data protection, also the Rent Demand names the same Company A Ltd., as the entity receiving the my rent payments. Even if the rest of the documents don't name neither/or, the fact the 2 aforementioned specifically named a different party from the one issuing this eviction notice, makes this notice void from origin. 


- **Legal Grounds:**

The eviction notice under Section 21(1)(b) of the Housing Act 1988 outlines the requirements for serving a valid eviction notice. Failure to comply renders the notice invalid.

d. **Court Oversight:**

The Central London County Court failed to identify discrepancies in the definition of the landlord, and failed as well to identify the essential Documentation was wrongly provided, validating the flawed protocol and raising suspicions of collusion with an economic power. With all this the Court also failed to acknowledge the claimant obtained my personal data illegally presumably from the company I signed the contract with, Company A  Limited, (find privacy notice given by Company A  Ltd, which in this case, failed to protect my personal data, in breach of my right to have a personal and family life.

The court also failed to respond my FOI request submitted on the 27th Oct 2023, demanding the video from the hearing where the notice of possession was granted followed by notice of eviction. As I consider a key piece of the puzzle to prove all the procedural mistakes leading to this illegal and discriminatory eviction.
 

- **Legal Grounds:**

Rule 39.2(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules emphasizes the court's duty to ensure the correct parties are involved, and any oversight questions the legality of the eviction process.

e. **Unaddressed Disrepairs:**

I reported serious disrepairs from the beginning, since day one I moved in, such as a broken shower tab, bathroom windows without double glazing and not able to close properly allowing draughts inside, and a dip in the roof on top of my head, causing water ingress down to the flat (find emails to agent and L.H.A reporting disrepairs. I reported this to my LHA, Westminster City, since June 2022. Before the Eviction Notice under S21 was served to me in October 2022, making this notice illegal from origing under the provisions of the Deregulation Act 2015. I had to report the same disrepairs in 4 different ocassions from day one i moved in, until today, finally managing to get an Improvement Notice on the LandLord this past October 2023 (find L.H.A Improvent & Hazard Awareness Notices ). So the Landlord is legally prevented from issuing any notice as it will be considered Retaliatory or Revenge Eviction.
 

- **Legal Grounds:** Sections 11 and 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 impose obligations on landlords to address and rectify disrepairs promptly. Failure to do so has adverse consequences.

Disrepairs affecting the habitability of a property are addressed under the Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018 and related regulations.
 

The Misrepresentation Act 1967 is a statutory framework in the UK that addresses various types of misrepresentation. It allows for remedies such as rescission and damages in cases of innocent, negligent, or fraudulent misrepresentation.

Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, I have the right to expect that the property is of a satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, and that services provided, including repairs, are carried out with reasonable care and skill. The persistent disrepairs and the landlord's failure to address them despite of an improvement notice, represent a breach of my consumer rights.
 

Sections 33 to 41 of the Deregulation Act 2015 are provisions providing safeguards for tenants who make legitimate complaints about the condition of the property, and they aim to prevent landlords from evicting tenants as a form of retaliation.

Here are some key points from the legal framework:
 

Section 33 - Prohibition on Retaliatory Eviction: This section establishes that a landlord cannot serve a Section 21 notice (a notice seeking possession) in response to a tenant's complaint about the condition of the property.

Section 34 - Tenant's Right to Repair: Tenants have the right to request that their landlord carries out repairs to the property. If the landlord fails to respond, the tenant may have the right to arrange for the repairs to be carried out and deduct the cost from the rent
 

Section 35 - Notice Procedures: If a tenant makes a legitimate complaint about the condition of the property, the landlord must respond within 14 days. The response should either confirm the intended action to address the issue or explain why no action will be taken.

Section 36 - Retaliatory Eviction Orders: If the local housing authority determines that a complaint made by the tenant is valid and the landlord has failed to address the issue, the authority can issue a Retaliatory Eviction Order. This order prevents the landlord from serving a Section 21 notice for a specified period
 

f. **Health Implications:**

The unsatisfactory living conditions caused by the dip on top of my roof, including mould and dampness, exacerbated by a broken shower faucet and having to transit between my warm bedroom and the cold and poorly insulated bathroom, have led to two different acute pneumonia episodes within 10 months. First one in May 2022, with a 7 days stay in the hospital, 4 of those in state of a coma inside the Intensive Care Unit at St. Thomas's, and a recovery period of 6 months.

Second one in February 2023, with a 4 day stay back at St. Thomas's Hospital with associated kidney failure; doctors gave me 6 months recovery period again. Even if the claimant and the managing agency were aware of the situation, the problems continue growing bigger, and it's in my believe, the case of criminal negligence, being actively engaging in illicit activities to complicate my everyday life making very uncomfortable to live there and adversely affecting my health and wellbeing.

When I moved in, I was so full of hope thinking I was going to be able to find a new home that will ground me to this incredible country, reorganise and remake myself overcoming all challenges that a forced migration under Covid-19 pandemic supposed. Instead, I had engaged in this emotionally exhausting process of reporting disrepairs and the constant stress not to upset the landlord to much and being perceived as an annoying tenant.

I was looking forward to enjoy the rush and excitement of decorating and making my home cosy and warm. Instead, I had to spend an entire year of my life, recovering from the pneumonia.

In May 2022 I almost died after a septic shock that put me in a coma for 4 days, I have seen what's in the other side, I took that one first breath again when coming back, for what? I lost my full respiratory capacity, and have now a chronic dry cough, I had to stop physical activity for a year while recovering in combination with the emotional distress from my new reallity and the constant harassment coming from the claimant and their allies caused enormous insecurity issues after gaining over 40 pounds in weight and body fat, entering in a spiral of self hate and helplesness. Because of this I haven't been able to perform the activities related to the means to provide for myself, leading to a financial bankruptcy adding up to this self destructive spiral
 

- **Legal Grounds:** The Equality Act 2010 recognizes HIV as a disability. The health implications resulting from poor living conditions should be considered under this legal framework, particularly in light of Section 15 which addresses discrimination arising from disability.
 

Additionally, the Housing Act 2004 includes provisions to ensure that housing conditions do not adversely affect the health of occupants
 

g. **Denial of Right to Postpone Hearing:**

Despite my compromised health attending the hearing on the 7th March 2023 (just 3 weeks after being discharged from Hospital), the court denied my right to postpone the hearing, the honorable judge presiding didn't even bother reading my doctor's letter, or took in consideration I was attending the hearing assisted by a suplementary oxygen tank, he excused himself by saying: I can see you are unwell, then he asked the claimants barister what was his oppinion regarding rescheduling the hearing, barister replied: "We are all already herek we should carry on", following the judge decided to carry on with the hearing.  Leading to an unjust possession order. Find the discharge letters and the doctor's letter addressing my health situation, recovery period and recommendations, find also technical chart on the side effects the medication I was prescribed 
 

- **Legal Grounds:** Rule 3.1(2)(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules grants the court the power to adjourn hearings for fairness, and the denial of a fundamental right requires examination under the applicable legal framework.

h.** Breach of My Right to Private and Family Life.**

As per documents sent via email by the real state agent at Travistock Bow Ltd. the company to which I authorized to hold and process my personal data is Shaftsbury CL Ltd, as it states in the Privacy Notice included in that email. Therefore the claimant obtained and processed my personal data illegally.

I also received a letter on the 13th May 2022 from the claimant's solicitors, on note 5 says they have concerns about my online presence as a gay male prostitute, which apparently they were monitoring, they even mentioned my personal Twitter.com (now known as x.com) page: @__________, saying they found photos and video graphic material, presumably shot at the premises, raising suspicions I could be running a business. .

- **Legal Grounds:** Invasion of privacy according to the Data Protection Act 2018, and exploitation of prostitution concerns. When Landlords are aware the only source of income of a tenant comes from prostitution, they are committing Exploitation of Prostitution since they are making profits from immoral earnings according to relevant legal references included in the Sexual Offenses Act 2003

 

i. **Survival Enviromentally Oriented.**

On top of my flat I have a roof terrace on which I have a garden where I grow and harvest many of the vegetables I consume. In addition, I have a rescue and relocation program for ornamental plants. I basically rescue the plants that are being replaced by new season ones, and I take care of them while I find a new home for them. In exchange, I accept donations of clothing, cleaning supplies, food, etc.

In addition I do this using power from solar panels and through shade sails and a series of gutter pippes I collect rainwater to irrigate the plants via a dripping system, with the benefit of obtaining pure, naturally filtered water after forcing it through the plants while conducted by a system of artificial water falls and mazes filled with hydroponic pebbles growing good bacteria in charge of digesting organic mass, and the plants do the rest by taking nitrates and phosphates I use reclaimed plastic crates instead of pots for the plants, helping the City reusing plastic that otherwise would be just waste.

I'm also contributing with this country by developing new technologies to help the environment. I'm helping the City of London by consuming most of the rainwater I collect, I give release to the sewer system, and the water I goes to the drain is been treated and filtered first, so I return clean water. One square meter of green wall or vertical garden is able to generate up to 5-6 litres of oxygen per day. I have roughly 60 square meters of vertical garden on the terrace, being able to produce up to 360 litres of oxygen per day

If the Court allows the claimant's illegal action, will not only have me homeless, but also unable to procure myself with my basic needs as I will be also loosing my mean to get some of my food and financial aid.

- **Legal Grounds:** The law governing authorities' legal obligation to prevent decisions from exacerbating the vulnerability of individuals, especially those with pre-existing health conditions, is primarily found in the Equality Act 2010.

Key provisions of the Equality Act 2010 that are relevant to preventing discrimination against individuals with pre-existing health conditions include
 

Prohibition of Discrimination (Section 13): Section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 prohibits direct and indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimization based on a person's protected characteristics. Disability is one of the protected characteristics, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions may be covered under this category.
 

Duty to Make Reasonable Adjustments (Section 20): Section 20 imposes a duty on service providers, including housing authorities, to make reasonable adjustments to ensure that disabled individuals are not placed at a substantial disadvantage. This duty includes adjustments to policies, practices, or procedures that may indirectly discriminate against individuals with disabilities.

 

Public Sector Equality Duty (Section 149): Section 149 sets out the Public Sector Equality Duty, which requires public authorities, including housing authorities, to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination, advance equality of opportunity, and foster good relations between different groups. This duty is applicable when making decisions that may impact individuals, especially those with protected characteristics.
 

Housing-Related Duties (Schedule 16): Schedule 16 of the Equality Act 2010 contains provisions related to housing, including the duty of public authorities to have regard to the need to reduce or eliminate inequalities of outcome that result from socio-economic disadvantage.
 

When dealing with decisions related to housing and accommodation, authorities are expected to consider the impact on vulnerable individuals, including those with pre-existing health conditions, and take steps to avoid exacerbating their vulnerability.

Civil Procedure Rules, Part 3

The CPR Part 3 outlines the general rules governing the court's powers to control the progress of proceedings and considers the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly.

Summary:

The bailiffs are supposed to come take possession of my flat by today at 8am.

I desperately need some guidance on what should I do to prevent this... I already submitted a notice of appeal, but havent got any information if it was accepted.

no Im finishing submitting an Injunction.

I would very much appreciate any advice.

I have all documentary evidence to support my case, if you need something I can post it redacted.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, welcome to CAG. I'm sorry to hear about your problem.

This isn't really my field but if you're made homeless then the local council are the people to talk to.

HB

WWW.GOV.UK

Get help and advice from your local council if you're homeless or about to lose your home.

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As you posted this on Monday and stated the Bailiffs were coming to take possession of your Flat by 8am has this happened?

You seem to have left this since October 2022 when you were served the S21 Notice till now and looking at different legislation to prevent this.

For the Bailiffs to be involved the CCJ granted a Possession Order would have a time limit for you to leave the property which I assume you did not so the Landlord went back to the Courts to employ the services of the Bailiffs to Evict you from the Property as you had not left as per the time limit on the Possession Order.

You mention you are appealing this but have you heard anything yet?

You also mention submitting an Injunction exactly what for?

You were served a S21 Eviction Notice in October 2022 for what reason and were you re-served this S21 Notice since that date?

WWW.GOV.UK

Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated...

Exactly what date was your Possession Order hearing?

You mention the Landlord was served by the LHA an Improvement Notice in October 2023 is that date correct? (note this would not stop the Landlord continuing down the S21 route from October 2022)

You keep mentioning the Landlord has Shared Data it if fully in there Privacy Policy who and why they share Data which is correct and if you feel they have breached that them you make a Complaint to the Information Commissioner Office (ICO) (but IMO they have made no breach reading there Privacy Policy)

ICO.ORG.UK

If you have a concern about the way an organisation has handled your personal information or you have an issue accessing information from a...

There is no way for me to approach this question but to ask you state:

I also received a letter on the 13th May 2022 from the claimant's solicitors, on note 5 says they have concerns about my online presence as a gay male prostitute, which apparently they were monitoring, they even mentioned my personal Twitter.com (now known as x.com) page: @__________, saying they found photos and video graphic material, presumably shot at the premises, raising suspicions I could be running a business.

Is what they stated above correct? (you do not have to answer this on a public forum it is entirely up to you)

I have to agree you need to contact Shelter or any Asylum organisation is your local area to assist you with this.

  • Like 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...