Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EPC/ZZPS/GCTT/QDR ANPR PCN - Overstay - TEXACO - PELHAM _ 58 PELHAM ROAD GRAVESEND KENT DAll 8QR


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All, 

I hope you all are keeping well. 


I need some help,

I parked my vehicle in a petrol station to drop off a few bags of donations to a charity shop, not aware it’s timed. 


I’ve received multiple PCN’s to pay -I ignored them as I know euro car parks isn’t from council and are rogues. 


But recently two letters notice of transfer to solicitors have arrive.

I’m concerned as I don’t want any CCJ against me and I definitely don’t want bailiffs knocking at my door as I have two young children. 


Any help will be massively appreciated.

Thank you for reading.

Letter are attached. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete this:

you cant ever get bailiffs at you door for ANYTHING until you LOSE a court claim.

and a Debt Collector (A DCA) is NOT A BAILIFF

and have 

ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - not matter WHAT it's type

please scan up all letters from whoever, both sides , too one mass PDF.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you do the Q&A please

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The private parking companies rely on people not knowing the law and so being terrified of threats and then giving in.

Of course some legal threats are real - but the vast majority we see here are hot air from paper tigers.

As dx says - you can only get a CCJ if you receive a Letter of Claim, then you are taken to court, after you lose the court case, next you decide to defy the court and not pay.  That's what CCJs are for - to punish people who defy court orders.

Bailiffs can only be involved at this point - and even then, I've been on the site for eight years and I've never seen them get bailiffs involved for a CCJ for a single invoice, it's just not worth their while.

So relax!

You haven't even got a Letter of Claim yet, just daft letters designed to put the wind up you.

We need to see the original invoice and we need you to fill in the sticky as dx has asked you to do twice. 

This is essential information to see if ECP have bothered to follow the law in sending out their tripe - usually they don't!

You have also left ECP's reference number and your vehicle reg showing in your uploads.  Please read the upload guide and use the free sites indicated to redact properly. 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to EPC/ZZPS/GCTT/QDR ANPR PCN - Overstay - TEXACO - PELHAM _ 58 PELHAM ROAD GRAVESEND KENT DAll 8QR

pdf sorted

dx

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Date of the infringement 

20/05/2022

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 

I don’t have NTK as it’s a while back and I threw the letters away. 

Notice of Transer to solicitors

QDR solicitors 

DCBL bailiffs letter. 

I’ve only got 3 letters available.
 

3 Date received 04-10-2023
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] 

Not applicable
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? 

Yes I remember from previous they provide a image of my car. 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here

No

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up 

No
 

7 Who is the parking company? 

Euro Car Parks LTD 

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] 

TEXACO - PELHAM 58 PELHAM ROAD GRAVESEND KENT DA11 8QR
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

 

I can’t find any appeals bodies.  Not sure if it’s past the appeal stage? 

 

Edited by Ohdumplings
Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Ohdumplings said:

I don’t have NTK as it’s a while back and I threw the letters away.

Why on earth did you do this?  You're in a legal dispute - what made you think that not having the paperwork was better than having the paperwork?

If this does progress to court then you will have to prepare to defend yourself without properly knowing what you're being accused of.

You can recover the original paperwork by sending a SAR to Euro Car Parks Ltd (not the various powerless DCAs).  Do that tomorrow and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.  Strick in a Council Tax bill or similar as ID, otherwise they will use the lack of ID as an excuse to not cooperate.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear, I feel v silly. I was advised not to pay the original fine from Euro Car park ltd.

I will send euro Car park Ltd a SARS tomorrow, how long before they reply with the original paperwork as obviously they sold on my fine to these recovering agencies. 

This is the 3rd letter attached send back in April 2023. 
The letter states it for multiple fine for a total of £340 (£170 each) but I’m certain I only park the one off time.  So I’m really confused why they doubled up the fine? 

 

2023-04-12 DCBL 2xPCNs £340.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

where does anything say this is a FINE please?

speculative invoices are not SOLD to anyone

and a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and have 

ZERO legal powers on ANY DEBT - no matter what its type.

ignore

dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry.  You're not in any imminent danger of being taken to court.

All of us here have made mistakes when in legal dispute, the important thing is to learn from the mistake and get it right next time.

However, it is daft to throw away paperwork, it just leads to later having to grope around in the dark and not really understand what's going on.

Get the SAR off tomorrow.

It may be that DCBL have made a mistake when they talk about two invoices, as (a) they are useless and (b) they do everything on the cheap as that is the only way to make this type of litigation pay.  They mention "an attached statement" which will either be on the back of the letter or on a separate sheet.  Can we see this please?

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ZZPS are just a stupid debt collecting agency who send letters that are supposed to be threatening, and will have no info on you, so no need to SAR them.

It would be very useful to see the rest of that DCBL letter.  Either they have made a mistake or there are two invoices on the go.

Hopefully the SAR will resolve all these questions.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Good morning all,

Thank you all for your help so far. 

 This morning I’ve received 2 separate letters from Euro car parks Ltd after requesting further information to clarify the PCN notice. 
 
The Private and Confidential letter was a sign for letter. 

PCN debt passed to ZZPS + want photo ID to release data.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

both of which you ignore totally

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX,

one of the letters appears to be a refusal to supply a SAR.

This is despite the OP enclosing a council tax bill.

Shouldn't we address this?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

tick tick tick, once past the 30 days mandatory days to comply, i'd pers threaten then with reporting to the ICO, then court..?

there is no way the ppc having her photo or sig is going to forward their 'wish' to ID her as they dont know what either should look like.

CTAX bill is good enough for a gov't dept, so is well good enough for a private parking company.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is difficult now to know how to move forward with this.  You've thrown away important legal documentation and Euro Car Parks are being deliberately uncooperative in supplying it again.

I note they go on about one invoice, not two though.

We simply don't know - how long the overstay was, if you were within the consideration & grace periods, if there is one invoice or two, etc., etc.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

id p'haps warn them if they don't comply in 14 days you will be informing the ICO.

always best to pack their file toward authorities that are supposed to enforce first?

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...