Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oh yeah... So there is. ..    Hopefully it won't try to upgrade 😂😂
    • There's the ability to download origin for macOS Mojave and older right on the EA Website. www.ea.com/origin-for-mac      
    • Hello All, I was hoping for some help with a  Claim Form received yesterday 15h May 2024.  I have read lots of threads but I just want to check what I am doing. I have acknowledged service noting my intention to defend all of the claim and I have left the contest jurisdiction un-checked. I will today/tomorrow issue a CCA request with a £1 postal order to the claimant and a CPR 31:14 to the solicitor.  For the CCA which section should I use? I am not sure which section Paypal Credit would come under. If the claim was issued on the 9th May am I correct with my defence filing date of the 11th June? Is there anything else I need to do? Thanks in advance   Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre, Northampton Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio I Ltd How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self (just 1) Date of issue –  9th May 2024 Defence filing date: Tuesday 11th June?? Particulars of Claim What is the claim for  The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69 What is the total value of the claim? £340.69 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Not applicable Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? PayPal credit account When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After April 2007  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, shows as defaulted.  Registered when it was bought by Lowell Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Cant find a letter that say so Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Not sure Why did you cease payments? Financial difficulties and mental health issues What was the date of your last payment? ? Mid 2019 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
    • In addition to the advice and questions asked by my site team colleague above, where did you get the template from which you used to reply to the letter of claim?
    • should have come here first really. What you requested was a load of irrelevant twaddle. What was the original debt? Have you moved since taking it out? If TM Legal are chasing, that should means that Perch own it now? Did you get the letter of claim by email or post? You should kill the emails immediately.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Who's responsible for a rise in the water table?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is a strange one but thought I'd see if anyone was privvy to this info.

 

Basically, bought a house in a seaside area in Feb this year. (Lived in the city beforethat so never lived in this region). Got a mortgage valuation which didn't show anything up but after 10 years exp in property decided the gable end needed checking and got a structural survery privately. Neither reports stated that the water table could be an issue - in fact neither report mentioned the water table even though it's rising is common place here.

 

10 months on and many renovations later we have what we thought was a flood in the cellar. couldn't work out where it was coming from but found out from a friend it's due to the water table (water levels in the ground rise). the water has come through the concrete (which was already laid) to about 5" ruining 40sqm of marble (cheap on ebay!!), tools etc. we're been here 10 months and had many viewings as far back as 15 months ago and nothing like this has happened before.

 

Anyway due to the flooding called the insurance who told us it;s a natural thing so not covered unless the dampproof membrane has failed - we don't know if we have one and to find out we need to dig through the concrete. In other words the insurance wont help.

 

I appreciate the law prevades on caveat empetor when buying a house but should the water table rising not have been mentioned somewhere along the lines to us (I can bore anyone for hours about structural capacities & calculations, cavity walls etc but this doesn't factor in my knowledge!).

 

We're estimating around £1k in damage plus £5k to get the membrane re/fitted. It's a lot of money to pay out when we haven't been made aware of such a thing.

 

One thing that may be helpful is there are 3 rooms in the cellar - the hall way with stairs leading down, a back and front room. Only the hallway and back room have flooded - the front room is dry so to speak.

 

Advice/knowledge would be truly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate the surveyor's report you commissioned as a result of your concerns about the gable-end will probably be hedged around with "if's", "and's" and "maybe's" ,(not to mention "Terms and Conditions" too).

 

Is the part of the cellar affected by the rising water table beneath that gable-end? Is there a possible connection between the two? If so, then maybe you could consider approaching the surveyor?

 

I would have thought that a professionally qualified surveyor, practicing in an area where, as you say, the water-table is know to rise and fall, would have at least mentioned this in the survey, if only as a part of a general introduction to the survey.

 

However, as a straight answer to the question posed in the thread title, I suspect it is a 'natural phenomenon' that can occur almost anywhere.

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

quote: Neither reports stated that the water table could be an issue - in fact neither report mentioned the water table even though it's rising is common place here.

 

You seem to be aware that this was a potential risk, by mentioning the problem is common. Therefore, dont they have zones of risk to flooding? In which case surely the estate agents should have mentioned something about it. Surveyors though are supposed to recognise such things and point them out to you, as they have special instruments to measure damp etc and presumably there would have been evidence that this has occured before. Id enquire at the local council to see what they know about the problem in the area and ask the neighbours if they have the same dilema. They may have had to deal with the same problem and offer you some advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joncris - unfortunately the property was left in a will and then sold to us and the beneficiary had stripped the house bare and left the sale up to the solicitor therefore leaving no details of previous guarantees, work done etc behind.

 

The only other info I have is that the adjoining property's cellar is also flooded. The nearer the sea the worse it get apparently. 1/2 mile down the road a friend of ours has their cellar rising to 2ft in water sometimes. I didn't specifically raise a query on this with either the estate agent or my structural surveyor as I didn't know about such things! Only from whining at friends about it did I find out it happens to a lot of properties here.

Damp was located in the cellar and a damp course in the walls was iinstalled but nothing was mentioned with regards to the floor or any impending flooding!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

tedsbird are you a property developer. If so it just became harder in that you would be a person expected to have special knowledge. Not having a survey is/was a big mistake. Having said that the roof repair should be guaranteed & if the work was not carried out properly you will have claim for all damages against the agents or whoever employed them.

 

Also you need to see a copy of the questionair your solicitor sent to the vendors representatives to see if it enquired about the water table &/or flooding.

 

In fact ask for the whole file as it belongs to you assuming you have paid the fees that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, not a devleoper but I have owned quite a few houses and worked in an estate agents. I did have surverys, both via the mortgage company and my own structural survey. there isn't any damage to the roof nor has it been repaired. the gable wall was tied in and anchor bolted but nothing to the roof.

i've checked all the paperwork and the water table isn't mentioned at all neither is flooding.

 

I just wondered really if anyone could lay this at the insurance company or the council! or even better somewhere where i could get a grant or something cheap!

Link to post
Share on other sites

tedsbird

In that case if it is & always has been a common problem in the area you may have a claim against your conveyencer as they should have asked the question when the list was submitted to the vendors.

 

The floor membrane should have been extended part way up the walls. Also I think you need to revisit you insurance policy as to my thinking you are covered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My last property was just 400 metres from the shore, and the water table was not a problem within the house (no rooms sub-ground) however there was sand under the floors. We dug 1 5ft hole and put in a linear damp detector. We could easily track the twice daily tides as the water table rose and fell in sync. (By around 6 inches). There is every chance the membrane (if fitted) has ruptured, but finding who to blame will be impossible. Do remember, if you claim on insurance, they will flag this fact to the Insurance Hunter database, making any switch of provider difficult, as full disclosure will be required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your responses.

 

We;ve drilled a 5" hole through the concrete and there is a plastic membrane with sand underneath (and some water too!). Called the insurance yesterday who said we need to get a professional out (but couldn't tell us which professional) who could investigate and explain why the membrane had ruptured to ascertain whether the reason would be an insured peril!!!!!

Would I get a dampproofing company out who tank cellars as part of their business or what? I'm insured with morethan who are not more than helpful. They wouldn't advise who to get which could result in them saying they're not happy with the report and they wouldn't say what was or wasn't an 'insured peril' either. They asked me to get a report faxed over and they would take it from there. Never mind all the damaged stuff. They also mentioned that either way I would have to have this resolved as the mortgage company would insist it is sorted out - which is fair enough.

 

I'm not overly concerned regarding switching insurance companies as once the problem is rectified it shouldn't pose an issue in future so long as the work is guaranteed.

 

We're not in a conservation area either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ACT OF GOD

been there wore the teeshirt.

I was renovating an old TSB Bank into flats in Bootle,

The basement "Vault" was prone to flooding during high tide.

So TSB (then) had membranes fitted all around basement (TANKED) correct terminology,

Now a row of terraced house`s were connected at the uphill side of this old bank,and because of the TANKING the building became a form of DAM.

and being the bottom of a hill,a good DAM.

So after removing some masonry to inspect after neighbours had complained to enviromental Health, I seen that water was building up to approx 5ft ,then backflooding into next doors basement,and so on along the row.

So Env Health thought they had a case (against TSB) who had works done 10 years prev, but alas (water was saline) mersey estuary,on certain high tides, with good rain "water table overflowed" and judge bounced it,

So 1 of the neighbours tried sueing surveyer only been there 2 years, and as its not a persistant common fault and wasn`t visable at time of survey

the judge bounced that claim as well along the ACT OF GOD LINES

and building propertys in underground streambeds the builder might be at fault (though 100 years ago)

i doubt the builders still alive :-x .

 

ps you will probally find the water is either seeping through brickwork, or backing up the drains "if as you say a membranes fitted to concrete" though this core hole will certainly be a future problem now", being so near to the beach i`d opt for drains.

 

and are you sure no pits "landfill sites ,have been filled in in the last 5 years or so, as ive seen this here in M\Cr,an old claypit filled

in,water table rose 12ins in 2 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave, that wasn't that far from me! I used to work in the club opposite those flats! I'm about 1/2 mile from Southport - in Birkdale.

 

There is a soak away drain about a metre from where the flooding starts. But these were all cleaned up when we added to it and had the gable end re-done and an extension built. I don't fancy the possibility of having them inspected to see if there is a break as not only will it cost a fortune but we've had the area all block paved and I know the insurance will not cover that due to previous experience.

 

My main problem now is getting this sorted on the insurance. I pay enough for it each year and I've got accidental and every other cover available! They haven't sent any t&c's to state what is covered and what isn't covered for the buildings - just the schedule.

 

I;m thinking of getting the structural surveyor back to see what he thinks. i doubt he would have been aware of it as the cellar has been dry for the 10 months or so we've had it and the 4 months it took to purchase the property it was also dry.

Just thinking tho, we;ve had a damp course to the brick work done and a full damp inspection - had it been long standing wouldn't it have shown up then? Could the membrane have ruptured do to the extentive amount of building work we've had done? In which case would the insurance pay out?

This is one complicated scenario!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DPC Co survey"should have shown dampness in bricks" as being a cellar though unless tanked there will always be damp present.

The floor/membrane failure could probally be cured by asphalt flooring

(cheapest option). as for 10months with no visable sign of damp,

The bank i worked on had nearly 10 years of no sign.after tanking.

Its took that long for bricks to perish enough to become absorbant,or

as i more likely suspect a drain failure, (its the sand thats got me thinking this), sands waterproof so when mixed with water, it doesn`t absord it,

it becomes it. and flows away.now with drains resting on this and the void created by the sand erosion under drains (they tend to break) and being a cellar drain (below ground level) water tends to make its way back up the drain.

If i was you i`d aquire a 4in drain bung (to seal OFF DRAINgrid top

Get 1 from hire shop,and a sump pump (probally cost you £50 ish for weekend) Plug drain with bung,pump water to an external drain (these will be on a different line and level)after level has gone to bore hole, water will flow from brickwork for a few hours (if this slows down) take pump back

and keep bung :o ,as its the drain, say you cant find it and it`ll cost you about a tenner.

and dont spill water down there as youve nolonger got a drain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tedsbird

 

The 'Insured Peril' refers to all of the circumstances as listed in the policy terms.

 

If it includes flooding then you should be covered. Also if your insurer want's you to have the cellar checked then they should pay for it. Speak to your solicitor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently not! i spoke to the insurers today who said they can reasonably request further information to ascertain if the claim is an insured peril. Their request for further information is in the form of a report from a professional in that trade. Even if the water came from a drain then they would expect me to call in the enironmental health who would then advise if it came from a soak away or from the main drains. This is highly unlikely as we're having really bad rain at the moment and the cellar isn't getting worse and we've got new main drains.

A friend in the trade called today and said this is either the water table rising above the membrane and penetrating the bricks/cement or when we;ve had work done they've disturbed the membrane. Either way we're not covered on the insurance!! I;ll need to make a few more bank charge claims to pay for this one!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are entitled to ask questions but they are not entitled to ask you to go to the costly expense of finding the cause. They should be doing that themselves or agreeing to meet your agreed costs before making a decision.

 

As this appears to be a costly matter & will affect any resale see a lawyer NOW!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...