Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi @BankFodder I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.  It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. So when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.  Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
    • Hi What they have asked in what you have highlighted isn't unusual at all as Councils have numerous different departments that deal with specific different areas within that council. So if what you are asking in your DSAR is say specific to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Planning Permission etc then just let them know that specific area. On the other hand if you want every bit of DATA they hold on you then simply tell then ALL DATA they hold on you it's them up to then to go through all depts to check for it. 
    • A growing number of couples are booking a content creators to capture their special day.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GXS ANPR PCN ONE - Coole and Bevis Aldwick


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 289 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

New to this site... Been drawn here due to this parking hell.

I was contacted by Trace (1st i knew of it) about 2 fines,, 1 on 7/6 and another on 21/6,,

Not only was this the first i had heard of the parking infringement but there were no details on their letter stating any of the parking details.. so i didn't know type of car, registration, address.. nothing..

When i eventually got hold of Trace they told me it related to two offences where a young girl could be seen exiting a Red Fiat...

This is a car i lease for my daughter who is a care worker..

So it then became clear that she had unknowingly parked up and been fined by GXS??

The increase in fine to £170 each was the first i/we had heard of it..

Their last letter to me has said they want proof that my daughter is allowed to drive the car under the lease agreement but it won't change anything as i'm the registered keeper anyway.. They also add they will not converse with me further... They asked me to send the proof!!!

My question is has anyone else failed to be informed of the original action??

I still have no record of this so i can't even see the "evidence" against us!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st it is NOT A FINE , its a speculative invoice for the driver supposedly entering into some fictitious with GXS  by entering the private land GXS might manage on behalf of the land owner if the contract is valid and upto date.

2nd why have you not received anything to date before trace got involved? they usually get involved if the address of the registered keeper on the car's V5C is incorrect? and the RK has moved in recent times and not updated DVLA.

anyway stuff that for now

please complete this

 

i would suggest you get a new topic started for the 2nd speculative invoice 

you appear to have been in extended contact with trace.

can we please have all comms in/out to date posted up to one multipage pdf. read upload<<clickme guide

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to GXS ANPR PCN ONE - Coole and Bevis Aldwick

Thank you for your response.

just to clarify, we did not receive any correspondence from GXS in relation to these two charges (maybe they were sent to the leasing company?) the first I knew of the charges was the notice from Trace.. 

V5C is correct and in my name.

I will endeavour to fill the details in of the questionnaire asap

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats interesting you think they must have sent everything to the lease company, as i wonder where they found out their detILS IF THE CAR'S v5c IS IN YOUR NAME (opps caps) . their return to the DVLA for keeper details would not show their details, but yours as the RK.

somethings not right here.

typically these lease companies also think these speculative invoices are fines too, and would have charged you a fee to inform them of your details . 

something is not right here, esp as you've 2 invoices.

 

 

.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the sound of it the lease company have not complied fully with the requirements of the Protection of freedoms Act when they received the original PCN.

What they should have done is send  GX your details and the contract you have with the lease company. then GX should send you  a new PCN . That doesn't seem to have happened. If they did not reply within 28 days GX are likely to have said that they are then liable for the charge. that is when the lease company have given them your details.

Strange then that GX have not followed up by sending you a PCN. I suggest that you check with the lease company and find out where they are with the PCN.  Ask them for copies of the two PCNs they received and when they responded to them.  When did they tell GXs that you were the lessee and if GXS are holding the lease company responsible for the charge.

Totally ignore Trace. It has nothing to do with them whether your daughter is insured or not.

Send GXs an sar [you will find it in our library section] and see what information they have on you and what they say they have sent you. do not contact them in any other way apart from the sar.

I take it you have still not received a PCN from them or any other correspondence?

It looks as if the lease company and GXS have messed the situation up between themselves which is good news for you. So no contact with either GXS ,Trace or any debt collector or solicitor  in the meantime. just wait for them to respond to the sar-which may not be for a month. 

In the meantime just relax as it looks as if you will end up in the clear.

Edited by lookinforinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

The lease company can't possibly be involved.

The DVLA V5C information is all they can possibly have. There is no public database containing the actual owner of every vehicle on the road.

Sounds like they have simply not sent out their usual carp missives.... unless

Mtec, do you ever have problems with mail delivery to your home?

 

.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

LFI is spot on.  SAR to GXS.  Also try to get the PCNs from the lease company.

Then you can get to the bottom of what all this is about.

Also have a read of this short thread  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/458110-gxs-anpr-pcn-ntk-coole-and-bevis-bognor-regis/#comment-5212295  You will get an idea of what they will do next - i.e. threaten to drop a nuclear bomb on your home, but in reality all huff & puff, well at least so far.

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know im being pedantic but please go check the V5C document you hold on this vehicle and ensure it states your name and current address as the registered keeper.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

really weird.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the DVLA database your car should be owned by the leasing company and that is where the original PCN should have gone.

Please check with the leasing company if they have received the PCNs and what have they done about it and when since Trace obviously know you ae involved. or is the car leased in your daughter's name and you are paying?

If the latter is the case has she had any communication from GXS and perhaps worried about telling you.

It is kind of difficult for us to help when we don't know the full picture. 

Things such as 

1] is the car leased 

2] if yes, in whose name

3] have you contacted the lease company  since if it is leased, that is where the PCNs will  have been sent initially.

4] what have they done/ have they advised GSX that the car is leased ; when did they tell them;have they paid the tickets; why haven't they told you what is happening?

Those answers will help help you and us to resolve this without you having to pay GSX.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@LookingForInfo

  

1 hour ago, lookinforinfo said:

On the DVLA database your car should be owned by the leasing company and that is where the original PCN should have gone.

there is no such thing as the OWNER of a vehicle on a V5C nor the DVLA database

confused......

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...