Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Horizon Parking PCNs on Rental Car - Gallagher Retail Park, Bradford Thornbury - Suggestions?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 185 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, 

 

First off, I just want to say thank you - this site and posters have been incredibly helpful and reassuring thus far. 

As I'm new to all of this, I am hoping for some reassurance that we are handling these fleecers correctly. To date, we have completely ignored the (currently 5) parking charge notices from Horizon Parking Ltd. 

My partner hired a rental car and drove it to Bradford for a week-long trip in late July. He has a very intense job and so I've taken up the fight against the **** that runs this scam parking operation. 

I have to assume that the rental car agency provided my partner's information to Horizon Parking Ltd. as it is his information on the PCN.

I have already read the previous threads from Bradfordlad and Dormiens to try to get my head around this situation and to make sure we are proceeding intelligently here.  

I've also uploaded PDFs of all of the notices we have received to this point (with name and address redacted) and answered the parking ticket questionnaire (at bottom). 

As per the notices, we are getting close to the appeal and payment deadlines (2nd and 8th October). The notices have arrived sporadically: to date, 4 have been initial notices and 1 has been a reminder to pay notice. 

 

The details:

  • My partner parked in the lot for 1-2 hours over 4 days to go to the Puregym there (the lot also serves an ODEON). 
  • The Puregym website states that this branch offers free parking with no further explanation. 
  • Upon receiving these notices, it became clear that this was not the case. 
  • In Bradfordlad's thread, we saw that the Puregym apparently has an iPad where its users can sign in for free parking - but this was not communicated or obvious to my partner during his use of the gym
  • Additionally, one poster on Tripadvisor, said they were fined simply for picking up their daughter from the cinema. 
  • The PCNs do not mention the parking time limit for the lot or where the lot is even located and as Bradfordlad stated, they incorrectly name the lot as "Gallagher Retail Park" instead of "Gallagher Leisure Park" and do not mention a town name, county name, or postcode anywhere.   
  • It was only my partner's memory that allowed us to locate the lot in question and then only by using Google Street View were we able to make out the signs which state the 45-minute parking limit. 
  • As this parking lot services both a gym and cinema, I would argue this short time limit is borderline entrapment - but I am no expert. 
  • We live in London and therefore going back to the lot or the gym to procure further evidence or to talk to the gym staff (this branch can be contacted by email only) would be an annoyance we would rather avoid. 

 

Do we continue to ignore these PCNs or do we need to take action? Is there anything else we should do (e.g. contact Puregym or the car rental agency) for more information/evidence?

Thank you in advance for any help/suggestions/recommendations!

We greatly appreciate it!

PS - I am very happy to provide more information regarding this ridiculousness if needed. 

 

 

 

PARKING TICKET QUESTIONNAIRE:

 

1 Date of the infringement  23rd July 2023  /  24th July 2023  /  25th July 2023  /  26th July 2023

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]  11th August (1) / 4th September (3)
 

3 Date received  Unsure - my partner opened the first one and mentioned it to me, but neither of us can remember the exact date we got it in the post, nor can we remember the subsequent dates that the other notices arrived. Their envelopes don't have any indicators on them. We believe it was at least 2 weeks after the notice issue dates but can't be certain or prove it. 
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]  No
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?  Yes
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]  No
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up  N/A
 

7 Who is the parking company?  Horizon Parking Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]  "Gallagher Retail Park - ANPR - TOMC" but actual location (as it's not clear/incorrectly stated on the notice) is: Gallagher Leisure Park, Thornbury, Bradford
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.  It mentions POPLA for appeals and BPA's logo is stamped at the bottom though not actually referred to in the notice's writing.

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

4 PCNs have arrived as well as 1 "Notice to Keeper Reminder Notice" (excellent grammar there...)

Notice Issue Date: 10th September 2023

Date of Breach: 24th July 2023

It refers to the PCN issued on 11th August 2023 and states that as no payment has been received, additional charges will be incurred if no payment is received within 28 days.  If no payment is received, they may pass it to a Debt Recovery Agent which may escalate to court proceedings... (blah blah blah)

It mentions POPLA for appeals and BPA's logo is stamped at the bottom though not actually referred to in the notice's writing. 

 

 

5xHorizon PCNs.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both dx and FTMDave for such quick replies!

I have forwarded this post to my partner to see what he thinks and for him to contact the gym (thank you for finding that email address for us!) - we'll see if the gym is willing and able to help out and if not if they have a contact for the leisure park.

It's a relief to learn that of 43 other threads on this site, Horizon has only followed through taking one case to court. I'd be willing to play those odds but I'll wait to see what my other half thinks. 

I'll be sure to keep this thread updated with any developments and to check for any additional advice anyone may have.

Happy to hear I didn't fall on my face with my first post! Always nice to be able to provide some fresh air 😅

-UKRoamer

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again all for your helpful input!

I believe we have opted to continue ignoring these vultures without paying. 

We have not yet received any additional notices, but we will keep this thread updated should that change. 

The input from @lookinforinfo is excellent - thank you! We will definitely return to it should this proceed to court. However, we do not have any plans to respond to their pitiful correspondence at this time. Though, should they continue to harass us, we may change our minds.  You are certainly correct - it is absurd that even after 11 years of operating they cannot be bothered to operate within the very clear and simple guidelines, but all the better for us I suppose! 

@dx100uk and @lookinforinfo, thank you for catching the additional info that needed to be redacted from the PDF. I did not think the rest mattered as it was a rental car, but as I said, I'm new to this - so thank you for catching it and fixing the oversight! 

Fingers crossed that Horizon get bored and give up soon, but as I said, if they don't, I will be sure to update the thread!

Best, 

-UKRoamer

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

UPDATE:

After returning from a trip to the States for a friend's wedding, we came home to 4 new letters. Pictures of all with redacted info have been posted. 

Three letters were "Notice to Keeper Reminder Notice(s)" - exactly like the one we received dated the 10th of September 2023. These newest "Notice to Keeper Reminder Notice(s)" were dated the 4th of October, 2023 and refer to the other three parking violations. 

 

The fourth letter we received was not from Horizon Parking but from a debt recovery agency named "Debt Recovery Plus."

This letter states that we may not have responded to the previous letters as an oversight, but that our failure to respond to this letter would be "making an active choice." It states that their client (Horizon Parking) reserves the right to take this as evidence of our intent not to pay. It then lists three options:

  1. Pay £150 in full to close the case and avoid legal action and protect our credit score,
  2. Enter a payment plan of £37.50 per month over 4 months (interest free - kind of them 🙄) again to close the case, avoid legal action, and to protect our credit score, or
  3. Do nothing which states that our financial loss will increase significantly if the case goes to court and we are unsuccessful - they go on to state that making this choice will result in them informing their legal team, sharing contact evidence, and advising legal action starts, with "intent not to pay" being added to the case. 

The date on this Debt Recovery Notice was the 17th of October and they instructed that we pay by the 31st of October. 

Not that it would have mattered, as we have not paid them yet and do not intend to, but as we returned from our trip and opened these letters yesterday (1st of November), it seems we have very much opted for their 3rd option of 'do nothing.'

Somewhat hilariously, the debt recovery letter also refers to the Protection of Freedoms Act of 2012 on the back despite their 'client' failing at every turn to comply with the Act themselves. 

 

Now, I do not imagine that this changes anything at this time as this is not a Letter of Claim. However, I wanted to keep this thread updated with all actions taken (or not taken) and with all letters received as you are the experts and will be better able to assist us should these weasels ever decide to actually take this to court. 

At the moment our plan is to continue to sit back and do nothing - but some reassurance that this cannot affect our credit score would be greatly appreciated. 

As always, please let me know if I am mistaken in anything I have written here and thank you again for your continued assistance with this nonsense. 🙏

 

Best,

UKRoamer

 

 

PDF Pack2.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I figured @FTMDave it's just always nice hearing it confirmed 😊

I informed my partner about the suggestion to contact the gym, but I do not believe he has done so.

I may bring it up to him again and see if he is more amenable to reaching out to them about this situation as the letters continue to arrive. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello again,

 

Time for an update now that it's been another month of receiving more letters... my god is it getting old...

First off, to answer the previous question - my partner never ended up contacting the gym. But at this point - it's unclear whether they would be able to help us at this stage anyway.

Updates:

We've had two further escalations since my last message - both from the debt recovery agency, Debt Recovery Plus. 

All appearances seem to point to the likelihood that they are taking this to court. I've attached the letters once again with the necessary info redacted. We have yet to contact them or respond to them in any way so as far as they know the letters have not been read or received by anyone. 

The third page is probably the most important as it is the front of the latest letters received. It's "Pre-legal Action" notice states things such as legal action being imminent and they instruct us to share the letter with our solicitor.  I particularly enjoy their claims of "Does the Parking Operator comply with relevant legislation? YES" and "Some sources online incorrectly suggest private parking charges do not need to be paid. This is not the case provided that all above criteria are met for your case."

As none of the letters have "Letter of Claim" on them, I do not know how seriously to take them. 

This is the first of what I anticipate being 3 more letters as there is a total of 4 parking claims against us and these 2 letters refer to the very first parking notice we received, not to the next 3. The other letters usually arrive a few weeks after the first, so the total amount they are looking for us to pay will end up being £600.

We still have zero interest in or intentions of paying them (no longer an option now according to the recent letters) and are not against taking them to court for this nonsense - though obviously,  with busy lives, we'd be just as happy not to have to deal with the faff of all that. 

Anyway, we are always very glad to receive your continued advice and support, even if it's just more of the same "keep the course" counsel as before. We would also like to know - at what point you would suggest we hire a solicitor for this situation?

 

All the best, 

-UKRoamer

Parking Notice PDF Pack 3_Debt Recovery Pre-Legal Action.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...