Jump to content


Capquest sending new letters re a 16yrs old barclays loan


zenith000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

Fellow Capquest target whereas my Capquest file/data has had its ownership change to 'Arrow Poplar Designated Activity Company' recently.

The alleged debt is roughly 17 years old and I could have sworn that I had sent a letter of Statute Barred (might be wrong).  Have lived at my current address for nearly 7 years and before that previous address was 5 years. The debt was chased in previous address and then went away and resurfaced last year. Transferred to OPOS who sent me letters and turned up one day I simply stated No to them on asking my name.

Just last week, received the change of Notice of Assignment.

My thought is to resend or send the Statue Barred letter to Capquest?

Would this be advisable?

Apologies if this has been answered  or if i need to start a new thread!

Any advice is appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

what type of debt who was the OC too?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Capquest sending new letters re a 16yrs old barclays loan

send them our statute barred letter from the debt collection section of our library

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also received a letter from Capquest this week advising the same thing.

They previously tried to take me to court for this account in 2017 which I contested advising the debt was statute barred. They later abandoned their claim in 2018.

Additionally, in the letter that I received, Capquest advised that they're still managing the debt on behalf of Arrow Poplar Designated Activity Company who they sold the debt to - which is kind of suspicious. I don't know what they're playing at but my best guess is that they're rearranging their deckchairs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this:

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

please create you own topic by hitting create or + in the top red banner

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...