Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yet another Brexitish failure   England set to miss post-Brexit targets to clean up rivers by 2027 INEWS.CO.UK Nearly 80 per cent of England's rivers, lakes and coastal waters may fail to reach a 'good' standard by 2027, a post-Brexit watchdog warns  
    • No. The defence is different. Their defence paragraph 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 – for the first time makes reference to an alleged term between the Packlink/EVRi contract which apparently specifically excludes the effect of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. If this is true then it is very likely that they will have closed that loophole because the 1999 act specifically allows itself to be excluded by an express term within the principal contract I think that you will have to do ask the court to require them to provide evidence by way of presenting their contract and also the date that this new amendment was inserted. I understand that your claim refers to an item which was lost a year or so ago. These give us the date. We would certainly want to know that this amendment predates the date when you first contracted with Packlink to send the item. I would want to say to the court that in the absence of their willingness to confirm with evidence the date that this contractual amendment was made, that the court should assume that this was a recent amendment and was therefore not in force at the time you made your contract. We have third-party defences on this sub- forum which are fairly recent and there has been no mention of this exclusion of the 1999 act. I think we can take it that this is something that they have put together very recently. Secondly, even if they want to exclude your third party rights, it does not absolve them from the negligent handling of your item and in respect of an action for negligence you have first party rights. You don't have to rely on third party rights – although of course, you didn't allege negligence in your original claim. We didn't advise you to do so. Maybe shortsightedly we didn't foresee this contractual amendment. Of course assuming that this contractual amendment is true – although I expect it has only been added recently – what they are saying here is that nobody in the United Kingdom who makes any contract with any parcel delivery company using Packlink will have the right to bring a claim for lost or damaged or even stolen parcels. These people have lost their moral compass. It is shabby treatment of ordinary customers who pay their money and who repose their trust in these parcel delivery companies. No wonder that the Paralegal Children are now ashamed to sign off these documents with their own names. In terms of parcel tracking information – apparently it has been destroyed according to their own data protection policy. That's their business. It's got nothing to do with you and they can't use this to frustrate the six year limitation for bring a breach of contract action or the three-year limitation period for bringing an action in negligence or other tort. There reference once again to the exclusion of the 1999 Act but this time apparently in the contract between you and Packlink – is irrelevant because the exclusion has to be in the commercial contract between Packlink and EVRi – which they have referred to in their paragraph 2.7 et cetera of their defence. I'm assuming that you propose to go ahead with this case. Please let us know when you respond and we will go forward. In the meantime, I suggest that you write a letter to EVRi. Referred to their paragraph 2.7 et cetera and asked them for a copy of the contract and confirmation of the date on which the exclusion of third party rights term was included in it. Tell EVRi that if they do not answer or if they refuse that this will be brought to the attention of the judge. Tell them also that you notice that they say that they have destroyed data in line with their data protection policy. Inform them that they do not appear to have disclosed this data protection policy to their customers. Please will they forward you a copy of it and once again if they failed to respond or if they refuse that you will bring this to the attention of the judge as well. I suggest that you post a draft of the letter here so we can have a look    
    • Good morning dx100UK Could I send the update to you privately? Regards
    • On the other thread you posted on, you asked about immigration issues. We aren't qualified to give that advice, sadly, you would need to find an authorised adviser. 'It is a criminal offence for a person to provide immigration advice or services in the UK unless their organisation is regulated by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) or is otherwise covered by the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Members of certain professional bodies may give immigration advice without registering with OISC.' How to become a regulated immigration adviser - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK  
    • Hi. Can you show us the letter from the police please? Cover up your name and address. Our upload guide will help you. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK Car Group/Billing Finance HP - New car with issues


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, stuggling said:

When I ask for date or return they do not give this over

They have done there own report and we got email Monday saying issues are due to driving it short distance and they will only contribute to repairs amd awaiting a quote for repairs, we asked how our driving causes the issue and they said the reports say and would be used in a court of law

 

So I understand that you have asked for a date for the return of the vehicle and they don't give an answer – is this correct?
How many times have you asked them?

I also understand that they have done their own report and they have said that the issues are caused by the fact that you have been driving the car only for short distances and because of this they will only contribute to repairs and they are waiting for a quotation for repairs. Is this correct?

Aren't they the repair garage themselves? And so shouldn't they be able to give you a quote for repairs immediately?

You have asked them about why your driving is responsible for the issues and they say that the report they have would only be used in a court of law and this is the reason they can't disclose it to you. Is this correct?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have asked 8 times for a date of return, each time they just say we have to allow then time to do reports.

Yes that's correct to the issues (though it's was used daily on motorway) 

We have questioned why no quote at same time, they have responded saying awaiting dealers garage to give quote, I asked how they are allowing this when they found no issues with the car, still no response. 

 

When asked how my driving was responsible they said that the report we got from ivis shows there weren't faults at time of purchase and this would be used in court, I asked how this is possible as ivis did not inspect the car at point of sale. They also are convinced we used it for short journeys as that is what ivis have told them. 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I'm getting the general picture.
We need to start assembling some documentation please.
He said that you've asked them eight times for the date of return. Have you done this in writing? If so, please can you assemble the messages – presumably emails.
One email per page please. We don't want pages of emails repeating the previous messages et cetera et cetera et cetera.
And also their responses.
So what we want is a multipage single file PDF document with your email to them, their email to you, your emails to them, their email to you – et cetera.
We also like to see the message asking why there was no quote and their response – once again the messages one per page – PDF.
Your message asking why they were allowing this when they found no issues.

Your message asking how your driving was responsible for problem and pointed out that IVIS did not inspect the car at point of sale – (which is a very excellent point to make, by the way)

Their message where they repeated the IVIS opinion that you had only use the vehicle for short journeys.

How long will it take you to get all of this please.

Do you have the MOT certificate that they issued – the new one? What is the name of the garage which produced the MOT certificate. How far is it away from the dealer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will.get all these sorted before end of day today, due to amount of emails to go through.

 

We have the MOT certificate (it's in car, but can get the one on gov website) the garage was called Golborne MOT LTD and is 1.6 miles away. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't we also waiting for the Vauxhall inspection report from you? You did say that you are going to upload that but it doesn't seem to have appeared.

I also asked you to let us know exactly how many days you have use the car. We don't have that information either.

 

Also, when the car is eventually returned to you – if it is returned to you – you must make an immediate note of the mileage and inspect it for any damage that might not have been there when you gave it to the garage.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The vauxhall one is page 2 on the pdf report above, its mixed in the ivis one but its a screen shot. 

Also used for 35days in total 

I'm sorting the emails and just got this response: 

Quote

 

The repairs were agreed prior to the supplying garage disputing liability. As such an independent inspection was completed to ascertain if we would be liable to assist with repairs, and to understand the faults better.

 

On this occasion, the independent inspection company has advised we are not liable for the found faults. Please see attached a copy of the report which will clarify the reasoning behind the report’s conclusion.

 

We have agreed to contribute towards the repairs, but we would need to understand how much it would cost to repair the Vehicle first. Therefore, a repair quote has been requested from the supplying garage. Unfortunately, the supplying garage are unable to provide this at the moment from their garage but have offered to look for quotes locally. Until we are able to review the quote, we cannot confirm the contribution towards the repairs. Alternatively, you can arrange collection of the Vehicle and provide a local repair quote for us to consider.

 

If following our offer Mr ... decides to decline, then we would look to close the complaint on the basis of a failed resolution, and you would be required to collect the Vehicle from the supplying garage. We would not be supporting your request to reject the Vehicle as we a not liable for the faults.

 

If you have any questions, please let us know, but we will contact you once we have received the required information.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Astonishing. Please could you post up the entire email here – using the quote function. It's much easier.

We would like to have the whole lot – including the Department which sent it, the date, reference – everything and whoever signed it.

This is in response to what?

It seems that they are now suggesting that you can collect the car if you want.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I'm on main laptop I will try upload it gives 54 pages to upload of emails to load, and I can't edit our names etc out, 

 

It was a response to me which was

Quote

 

 We have an email to say that car will be fixed and legally entitled to a repair or for a full refund on anything we have paid, 

 
You must prove the fault was not there at purchase, I have my own evidence showing otherwise and that it's not used on short journeys as you suggest. 
 
Short journeys is not evidence and its not used on short journest daily as suggested by yourself, it's is used daily on motorway for over an hour each way. And under the consumer rights acts 2015 the car should be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose and as described, my rights have been breached because the car you sold me is faulty I would like you to put this right by repairing the car at your costs as agreed on previous emails. 
 
Therefore you must fixed the car or refund all finances costs we have paid so far and incurred while not having a car. 

 

 
 
They are saying if we collect the car they will close the complaint and that they will not contribute to the repairs they also said the fault with DPF is due to the air con unit which after talking to a mechanic is not possible. 
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we would like to see the actual emails please.

The redaction of your personal details is not important if you aren't bothered.

However, are these 54 pages the emails which I've asked for above or is there more?

At the moment I only want to see the emails which I have asked for above. However I don't want multipage emails quoting the previous email and then the previous email and then the previous email et cetera et cetera.
That way we get multiple copies of the same email – and we need to avoid that for simplicity

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, produce a document containing only the originals of each email – without all the copies – in date order. Don't worry about redacting it and send it in confidence to our admin email address

 

Put the title of this thread in the subject line

Link to post
Share on other sites

or PM it to @BankFodder or @dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I will.sort this tomorrow I will put then all in a word document as a pdf and send over. 

Also to note my parents have purchased a £500 car for us and made sure its all good and up to standards, I will be paying them back but I needed a car due to my son needing physio 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep it as short as possible and manageable please in good order – good quality scans – no photos. No repetitions.
If this goes to court then you going to need anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well 200 pages is more than we can manage.

I especially wanted the a emails that you sent them and their responses. You said often they didn't respond so that's a maximum 16 emails – 16 pages.

In addition to that there are a few other messages – but according to your post not more than about six.

I also think that it might be a good idea to stop putting together an index page.

If you read our advice on preparing a court bundle, you will have particularly the reference to preparing an index page using a spreadsheet.

I think this will be an extremely good idea so that in addition to the emails that we have asked for, maybe there is an indexed list of all the correspondence and reports et cetera.

These would be in date order – (identity of the parties – from X to Y) – very brief description (hundred characters max) – your comments (200 characters max).

Once again, as well as manageable for us – and don't forget we have a lot on as well and we don't get paid – you will need to do something like this if the matter goes to court – and it probably will.

In terms of possible court proceedings, I envisage that you will be sending them a letter of complaint next Monday and then probably the following Monday you will issue a claim in the County Court depending on their reply.

However I think it's important to get the car back and I'm going to have a look again at the note they have sent you about collecting it and what it means. I think your letter of complaint on Monday will address that as well as making a complaint.

If it goes to court – then I would suggest that you will ask for rescission of the contract – and if the court declined to do that then damages.

We will have to have an independent inspection. I don't think we've seen your Vauxhall independent inspection have we?

It will probably worth getting another one.



 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also when you quote people's emails, can you please use the quote box. It's at the top of the message form – and you never use it
image.png
Also you never date anything. Why not? It's quite normal to date things so that we can at least form in our heads a chronology even if you won't give us the information.

 

And yes going back I see that you have produced the Vauxhall independent report – but you say that is mixed in with another one. Not helpful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, I'm hoping that you have an update on this and that the information we need can be provided to us so that we can move onto the next step.

I visited at the next it will be a full complaint and a letter of claim.
I'm sure that the car will be returned to you and then we should get an independent inspection and move forward with a claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thanks.

I know we are being very demanding here – but when we get it all sorted out it will be fairly straightforward and you will feel quite relaxed about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She is going to start again because this is going completely wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...