Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fullyskinted needs URGENT advice re Default!


Fullyskinted
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6343 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK, Ive got in a mess with my RBS card acct recently (Amongst others).

 

Didnt make the payment in September. On top of this I was having issues with tryign to get statements out of them so said I wouldnt be making any more payments until I had an up to date statement.

The DD bounced and then they never tried takign it again (afaik).

 

So, I recieve a letter yesterday (18th Dec) saying that I am being served a default notice. the letter is dated 18/12/06. It says I have until 22/12/06 to make the payment of £351 and avoid further action.

 

I called them and they said that if I was having money issues I will need to fill out a financial staement form and one had been sent to me after I had a phone call on 27/11/06. I havent recieved this :-?

 

The thing is this.

 

I made a payment of £50 on 27/11/06 by visa debit over the phone. Now as far as I know, they cant serve a default on me as long as I make payments!

 

Whats going on?

 

Im just about to ask all the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCA stuff in a letter, but Im gonna be out of time! Can I call them and ask for an email address and send it CC via email so I know theyre aware of the situation?

Ive also been advised that because they have served a default on me when they shouldnt have, they are in fact in breach of the contract which exists between us. Is this correct? If so can I quote that on the phone?

 

Ive drafted a letter but Im not sure its right to post it here...

 

WHAT THE HELL! Heres goes...

 

Mrs L Angell

Manager Customer Assistance

RBS

Credit Card Operations

PO Box 6050

Southend On Sea,

ESSEX

SS99 1WL

 

18th December 2006

 

My Ref: XX XXXX

Your Ref: XXXXXX

Ref Account No - 5434XXXXXXXXXXX

Dear Mrs Angell,

 

I write to confirm your letter dated 8th December as received today (18th December 2006).

 

I am confused as to why a Default Notice has been issued on me when I made a payment to the account with my VISA debit card at the end of November following your letter dated 24th November 2006 (I estimate the receipt of the letter dated 24th November and payment as stated; to have been on the 27th November, the reasons will be outlined below). The payment was for £50.00 (Fifty pounds). The telephone advisor I was speaking to said that if I was wishing to discuss a payment plan as I was having payment issues then she would send me a letter and a financial statement form which I was to complete and return.

 

I have had no contact with RBS in that time frame written or verbal. Today I am in receipt of your letter (dated 8th December 2006) with a Default Notice. Hardly fair, in my honest opinion. And as far as I am aware, seeing as I made a payment to the account, you yourselves (RBS) are in fact in breach of contract, not me. I have made a payment to the account and as long as I continue to make payments you cannot issue a default notice.

 

I therefore hold the account in dispute until I receive further information as described below and I have had 14 days to respond accordingly:

 

 

1.With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77 through 79), I am entitled to receive a copy of my credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

 

2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement that you allege exists.

 

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not.

 

I understand a copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days of receipt of this letter (sent recorded delivery).

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

Fullyskinted

 

 

OK, what says you lot then???

 

I need answers and FAST!!! (thanks) ;)

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FS,

 

A few points:

 

Delete points 2 & 3 as the debt has not as yet been assigned so best to omit them.

 

Also I'm not sure that there would be anything in your contract regarding them issuing default notices. Terms and conditions are generally less specific than that simply reserving the right to share your data with the CRAs. So I don't think you can argue that they are in breach of contract regarding this.

 

They can serve a default notice if you are not meeting the minimum payments or arranged a payment plan. So if your payment of 50.00 did not bring the account up to date, it may well be that they are able to issue a default notice.

 

It might be worth trying to send a budget planner and still trying to negotiate a payment plan on the grounds that you did not receive their budget. There are templates for this in the stickies at the top of this forum. However, once a default notice is served they may be less willing to negotiate but its worth a shot.

 

Also if the debt is made up of any charges you could dispute the debt on this grounds. Make it clear in your letter that you know you have paid charges on the account and that you formally dispute the amount owed on the grounds that it is partially made up of inaccurate charges. As the account is in dispute no action can be taken in respect of the account until such issues are resolved. Include a SAR request in the letter.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh, but the problem is the letter/response is due by Friday!

 

What if I offered to pay a further amount for now? Would that help?

 

Oh and thanks Zoot

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should also add that their letter was dated 8th Dec, not 18th :confused:

 

It took 10 days to get here!

 

Typo!!!

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have an e-mail address then e-mail it and send a letter just to be sure.

 

I would also point out the date discrepancy in your letter as this means you've had less time to respond and adds to your argument that they are acting unfairly.

 

Making payment at this time would also show willing and make them more amenable to negotiate.

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, just got off the phone from them. Ive paid £51 out fo the £351 arrears.

They said I will stil default even though I made a payment but they could delay it by 7 days.:(

7 days in this time of Xmas / NYE etc is bugger all imho but there you go.

 

I also requested Statements from Jan 2000 up to December 2003 (I already have 2004 thro 2006 due to another duspute with another part of RBS (Insurance). So that can get the charges claim rolling.

 

I also asked for a copy of the original credit agreement signed by myself.

 

I offered to pay the £1 but they said this was not needed.

 

I also asked for the deed of assignment (why not!?!) - maybe it will make them take a future offer seriously if it goes that way ;)

 

I am going to fax them all this in writing (as per the letter) in the morning.

 

And hard copy in the post recorded delivery with the ammended dates on etc.

 

They said that the statements will take 7 working days and the Credit agreement 10 days. All within the CCA request timescales. The clock wil really start clicking when I recieve the statements. If they can uphold that part of there end, why wouldnt they be able to send me the agreement too? ;)

 

Am I able to dispute the Default or not?

 

Notes:

Req

Statements

Copy of original agreement that was signed by myself

Copy of Deed of Assignment

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, that'll be why then!!!

 

Ill scrub that bit from the letter Im sending them. To be honest it was cribbed from a letter a mate used. His situation was *cough* slightly different *cough*

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...