Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

School Fees now chased by DCA


The Skiing Gardener
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Could you please help.

We were behind with school fees.

Rather than give us help even after we made a promise to pay and ask for a meeting. They sent to DCA and added interest and fees which we are disputing.

We paid the original sum direct to the school as promised

Details of dates are in attached School Chronology

School background history attached

Treatment fee plan attached

We would be really grateful for any advice or help on how we can get them drop the outstanding balance they are asking for.

We asked the school for a meeting several times - We were not informed of their business changes under the umbrella of another school and subsequent account details changing.

Even though we continue to communicate with the school they refer us to DCA who are really aggressive. 

Thank you 

 

Cronology.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Topic moved to Debt Collection agencies forum.

 

Financial legal forum is for when a court claim has been made.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly do nothing until the experts have been along and advised you, it may take a few days as they are all volunteers.

 

You are in no hurry, the DCA is powerless and you should not contact them, continue to contact the school and if you are in the position to make payments make them, or put your offer in writing to the school. Insist they deal with you, they cannot pass you to the DCA if you are offering payments or a payment plan.

 

You are not obliged to speak to the DCA and if they contact you by phone or try to doorstep you simply block their calls and shut the door in their face, tell them to leave or you'll call the Police.

 

The DCA has no power to add costs to the debt, it is not their debt, they are just working on a percentage commission if they bully you into paying, they cannot do anything to you only the original creditor can take court action.

 

Insist the school engages with you if they want the matter resolved, if you have a way to make a payment they cannot refuse then use it to show you are paying the debt, that will look very bad for them if they decide to go to court later.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

so bar the unlawful and fake DCA fees, you are upto date on payments?

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

Yes we are  up to date with our school account paid in full as of 1.9.22  However the agreement with the Bursar was not to included any interest  but it was added when passed to the DCA. We are disputing this.  I am just reposting an updated school history hopefully to make it clearer along with our school contract. 

 

Here is the amended document.

Amended School History 06.04.23 Time 13.56 .pdf School contract Names covered 5.1.15.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

well at the end of the day what can they really do to you....not a lot - it would be a simple civil CCJ.

is this no interest written down?

who's the dca redwoods?

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

see clause 4.f (III)

 

you have said you are upto date now, it appears you might not have been prior to now? so thats way there is interest being charged.?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need that in writing not verbal for it to stick and be binding.

 

they appear, by what i've already pointed too above, to be entitled to add interest if you've not fully paid for the previous teaching term period(s).

it is not due to the fact they passed it onto a DCA , they are just a powerless gofer whom can be totally ignored.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for highlighting  that clause in the contract but our circumstances had vastly changed.. 

 

I understand but we communicated many times in many meetings with the Bursar and  confirmed it it all our written communication prior to them adding the extra £10,000 in interest, We have confirmation verbally from the Head at the time and the Bursar that interest was not charged. We have a recording from a Zoom meeting and it was confirmed prior to us borrowing the by the accounts £26,000 from a family friend to clear the balance.

 

The words were if you don't clear the balance we will add interest. We communicated strongly we needed a meeting several times to show our intent That was the final communication.

 

We paid £400 a month until the funds could be released from their investment. Their comment back to the DCA was "we never agreed to accent £400 a month But that wasn't communicated to us at the time nor did they take our offer to pay £22,000 immediately. 

 

I hope that clarifies how it came about.

 

We had asked numerous times for an increased Bursary as we had Care home fees 0f £1200 a week. Our daughters treatment added an £26,000 over two and a bit years.. Our MT forms were clear about our financial constraints as the original bursary was granted prior to our daughter starting the school. We asked for help multiple times. They had their focus on putting a charge over our property.  

SK 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point, if no County Court claim has been issued, then you should write to the school advising that you will only communicate with the school and not the DCA. And that you would welcome any meetings with the school to discuss this ongoing dispute to examine whether any amicable resolution could be found. And send by post either recorded delivery or get proof of posting at Post Office.

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Could I ask for clarity on our issue of interest being charged on our paid school fees.

We are writing to the school advising them that we will only communicate with them. The school previously passed all our details to a Debt Collection Agency to chase the interest are they allowed to do this without our consent ?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only if its in their T&Cs in the event of defaulting and you have agreed to it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 07/04/2023 at 16:05, dx100uk said:

you need that in writing not verbal for it to stick and be binding.

they appear, by what i've already pointed too above, to be entitled to add interest if you've not fully paid for the previous teaching term period(s).

it is not due to the fact they passed it onto a DCA , they are just a powerless gofer whom can be totally ignored.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hidden

pdf only please

your pers details are all in file properties/info.

 

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please find attached a PDF pf a letter I wish to send the the board of governors.

I know it is lengthy but I would really appreciate your views on the attached letter with regard to all the issues at the school. This is following your earlier advice to ignore the DCA

Thank you

Board of Governors letter 24 5 2023 CAG copy PDF.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Could you please help us form a response to this letter attached.

We have received this response today from the letter on the above attachment. It was  sent to the CEO on 24th May  - Delivered on 25th May 23 asking for a 14 day response.

The reply came from the Director of Finance not the CEO and dated 9th June 23. Please see attached  letter.  

The letter was headed with our daughters name spelt incorrectly which I find in itself disrespectful, however not important as the main point is them completely ignoring the content of the letter we sent and telling us to deal with the DCA . We have continued to send letters to the school but they have and are completely ignoring us.  

Please advise how we can get the attention of the CEO. Is there a way to make them see that if they did take us to court, their behaviour would be considered obtuse

We iterate that we have asked for a meeting from the start of the discussions in March 22 when we needed to meet with them to discuss our need to get a family friend to release an investment as we still have no way of borrowing money from a bank.  Our plight was ignored on a basic bursary and scholarship awarded prior to our difficulties.  The back ground was previously posted. Please let me know if you wish it resending.

Thank you, we really appreciate your help and advice. 

 

Dear PARENT STUDENTS NAME

I am writing in response to your letter to Mr CEO dated 23 May 2023.

I have now had an opportunity to review your case and understand you have faced numerous personal financial challenges during and after STUDENTS time at SCHOOL.

Although STUDENT left SCHOOL in Summer 2020, the fee arrears began in 2017 and the matter was passed to a Debt Collection Consultant in June 2022.

The School repeatedly requested a payment plan and you were advised that if a plan was not agreed the matter would be passed to our Debt Collection Agency which would incur significant additional costs to yourselves

Unfortunately, as the matter was not resolved, it was therefore passed to DCA to act on behalf of the School to recover monies outstanding including interest payments and costs.

Whilst the initial outstanding amount has now been paid, further costs have been applied to the account given the significant delays.

Given the above, and as previously advised, please can you liaise directly with DCA, who are authorised to act on behalf of the Foundation, regarding the amount outstanding on the account.

Yours sincerely Director of Finance and Resources

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them the DCA fees are unlawful.

 

dx

 

  • Like 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...