Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Blemain SPO Court hearing to extend it - Now Eviction Notice - n244?


michelle456
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am getting the impression that BF are treading very carefully at the moment, because they are under investigation!

 

I have just received a breakdown of charges, that i have repeatedly been trying to get, and i have not been charged for all the arrears letters they keep sending, which surprised me.

 

There is however a couple of things that will be challenged i.e £1500 for in-house lpa receivers that later resigned when they were challenged, and £16000.00 renewal fees on two occasions (yes the noughts were right )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do Blemain still charge per letters?

 

On their website it states that they charge an account fee per month when there is arrears with no payment arrangement.

 

http://blemainfinance.co.uk/customerservice/tariff_charges.aspx

 

If they are doing both that will need investigating! Easy reclaim if the say they charge one thing, but actually do another!

 

CO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your right blemain don’t charge per letter or per phone call anymore, people don’t get harassed so much now that they cant make money from harassment.

As for arrears letters then they have to send one every month while your account is in arrears.

Blemain are treading very carefully wile under investigation, but can a leopard change its spots.

As I have said before they haven’t changed.

1 why are they editing peoples accounts to remove the name monarch recoveries.

2 LMC have been orderd by the FSA to repay unfair charges, why don’t the whole blemain group of companies repay all its customers effected by unfair charges.

 

Cheesed _off do you have loan with blemain or any other association with blemain ?

wp3

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiYes my partner has a loan with Blemain (& GE) - which we had problems with a couple of years back and it wasnt a positive experience. I like to keep my eye on what they are doing. I was worried then as when we fell into arrears we got a monthly fee, I think I am going to request my statement to be on the safe side!CO

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 9 years later...

Last Monday I received a Notice of Hearing, that next Monday (6th March) Blemain have requested, listed to allow 15 minutes.

 

The N244 asks that the application be heard without a hearing before a District Judge and requests:

 

1.       Permission for a warrant of possession to issued for the full outstanding balance pursuant to CPR 63.2.

 

2.       As more than 6 years has elapsed the Claimant requires permission of the Court for a Warrant of Possession to be issued. The Claimant relies on the attached witness statement of xxxxxx xxxxxx all dated xxxxxxx.

 

3.       We ask that this Application be made without notice being served on the other parties further to CPR 63.2 (5)

 

Are they issuing this because the old order is elapsed or is there something I should worry about?

 

Is there anything I can or should do about this?

 

They have made a number of incorrect claims in the Witness Statement such as not payment from me for several months when I have made one or two payments every month, last made on 6th and 26th January, and 24th February.

 

During the last three months, I have had to spend £3,000, repairing a roof, drain, replace a washing machine and front door lock, and with covid I have being pay them less than agreed, but I am still trying to make some form of payments to Blemain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes object .

 

old and new threads merged.

 

so they got a suspended possession order some years ago and your fought them off?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly not on papers only and if the warrant has expired you most certainly need to object to it being re instated

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you object to the hearing being papers only (means the judge just looks at paperwork not speak to you directly)

you want to ATTEND in person.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Sorry, if I am a little ignorant on court procedure, but can I just turn up at the hearing or do I need to advise the court?

 

I understand what you are saying, but by deferring it, so they have to pay someone to present their case, aren’t I just increasing the costs which I will be responsible for?

Edited by michelle456
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the Notice of Hearing from the court inform you to attend...?  Forget what they requested on the N244.

 

Quote

3.       We ask that this Application be made without notice being served on the other parties further to CPR 63.2 (5)

 

:confused:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it reads:

 

Take Notice that the Application Hearing will take place.........when you should attend.

 

It is listed for 15 minutes and the plaintiff has requested the application be dealt with without a hearing.

 

I didn't read the Application very carefully before or wouldn't have asked the questions on attending court before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then attend and take proof of your payments. I doubt the court will object to their application .....it will still remain suspended they are simply reactivating their suspended possession order. 

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 When I received the application I read it as reactivating the Suspended Possession Order as this has now expired and, like you, I cannot see the court refusing the application.

 

As, it's the loss of half a day, is there any problem if I don't go and try and make some money instead? It says I should attend, it doesn't order me to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy,

 

The article, which is now nearly 3 years old, appears aimed more at the rental market, while I assume it refers to all possession orders. Which part did you think affected me as a "homeowner"?

 

With the hearing on Monday, I was going to write to the Clerk of the Court today to explain my husband and I had just got over flu and would not wish to infect anyone by attending. I intended to enclose proof of payments made to Blemain and payments of £2,781 made in last 3 months on home repairs, along with an offer to continue realistic payments until the debt is cleared. Should I email this to Blemain as well?

 

In their Witness Statement Blemain ask for the Warrant of Possession to be valid for 12 months. Should I be concerned about this short period.

 

Many thanks,

 

 

Michelle 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theats the standard length of time so quite normal.

 

the warrant or writ for possession will be valid for 12 months once it is having been issued as per CPR 83.3(3). A Court has the power to extend a warrant or writ by a further 12 months under CPR 83.3(4).

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Why are you having to file an n244?

 

What has happened since 1 mth ago?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...