Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Packlink/Evri lost my £850 parcel - court claim to Evri - new Mcol system


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Please see below for a brief rundown of everything that has happened so far.

 

20/11/22 - I paid for an Evri shipping label through eBay's shipping label purchasing system. I packaged the item, printed the label off and dropped the parcel off at an Evri Parcel Shop.

21/11/22 - Evri tracking showed that at 13:27 - Mon Nov 21 they had received my parcel at the ParcelShop and that they would be collecting it shortly. At 15:17 - Mon Nov 21 Evri tracking showed that they had collected my parcel.

26/11/22 - The buyer opened a request through eBay as the item had not been delivered.

29/11/22 - Evri as the item had not been delivered.

03/12/22 - eBay refunded the buyer the £850 they paid for the item.

04/12/22 - Evri confirmed that the parcel was unaccounted for and that I should follow my own procedures for lost parcels. Since this date, there has been a lot of back and forth Evri and they refused to pay me compensation for the lost parcel.

30/12/22 - After several back and forth emails I sent Evri a Letter of Claim stating that in 14 days, I would be issuing a claim against them.

05/01/23 - I received the latest email from Evri stating that they could not offer me any compensation as the the shipping label was bought through Packlink through eBay's packing label purchasing system.

 

I issued an MCOL on 17/01/22. Evri has just responded denying the claim, stating that there is no contractual relationship between myself and Evri only myself and Packlink so they are not liable for any claims. However, through reading these forums I am aware that I through the Rights of Third Parties Act that they can be held liable.

 

I am not sure what to do next and would really appreciate your help. I can also attached their response for clarity if need be.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DQ N180 Time

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Pcklink/Evri lost my £850 parcel - court claim against evri issued -they defended - whats next please?

Please post your letter of claim and also your claim form in PDF format

Also their defence.

Also make sure you have read very thoroughly around this sub- forum. There are many issues but the issue of third party rights is something that is particularly prominent at the moment.

Especially read this thread

And also the discussion from here onwards:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I will have a read through those threads. 
 

Please see attached for the LOC, Claim Form and their defence. Please note they have not submitted their through the MCOL service, they only emailed it to me and it has been over a month and they have passed their requested extension so I have been presented with the option of requesting a CCJ. Would greatly appreciate your advice. Thank you. 

366MC231 NHK v EVRi Parcelnet Limited.pdf 366MC231-claim-form-claimant-copy.pdf Letter of Claim.pdf

Edited by SpecialK71
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the option of applying for judgement then you should have done it straight away .

The whole purpose of issuing a claim is to get judgement .

If the other side doesn't meet the deadlines then it is open to you to apply for judgement and I'm not sure why you are hanging around .

Go and apply for the judgement immediately.

You are simply handing an advantage to them if you don't.

You risk losing this case simply because you haven't responded to their failure to meet a particular deadline.

I see that their defence is dated the 20th of February.

It may well be that by the time you try to apply for judgement, you will discover that there is a copy of the defence on the MoneyClaim system .

The response deadline for your original claim was the 6th of February. I understand that they applied for an extension and this would take them to the 20th .

It is quite usual that these people slip in their paperwork at the very last moment .

However, you should keep an eye open and if you are given an opportunity to apply for judgement, then you should do it immediately and don't hang around asking us.

If you are able to apply for judgement then do it but be ready for them to apply for a set-aside of the judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I checked the system yesterday they had not responded however, the option to apply for a CCJ. However, when I checked this morning, the option was there so I have submitted that request. 
 

They sent the below wording in the email with the defence letter at 12:50pm yesterday:

 

Dear sir,

 

Please see attached Defence that has also been filed with the court.

 

Due to an error with the defendants system we are unable to upload the defence online and therefore have been advised to issue this to you via email. In the meantime the court will update the system.

———————————————————————————

They had until 4pm on the 20th to respond. However their defence is still not in the system so I don’t know how legitimate the message above is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done on applying for the judgement but be aware that it probably won't go through .

 

It is essential that you keep on top of deadlines .

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are were right @BankFodder

 

The MCOL was updated with the below:

 

Evri applied by post to change something about the claim

We’ll post you a copy of their application. This will explain what you need to do next.

Your online account won’t be updated - any further updates will be by post.

--------------------------------------------------------------

I also received an email from [email protected] stating the below:

 

 

Good morning

The Defendant has filed their defence, a copy of which is attached to this email.

Both parties now need to complete the attached Directions Questionnaire, form N180, before 16:00pm on 10/03/2023.

Please email your completed N180 form, as an attachment, to [email protected] for filing. A copy should also be sent to the other party named on the claim.

Please be aware that if you don’t complete and return the Directions Questionnaire (N180) to the Court for filing, your claim and/or defence could be struck out.

Please contact us if you require any further information.

 

I have attached the N180 form. It seems pretty straightforward just want your advice just incase there is anything I should be looking out for. Thank you.

MCOL Update.pdf N180 form 06.22 fillable.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

A1 yes

c1 yes

d1 no

E1 your nearest Co Court 

E2 no

E3 1

E4 as required

E5 we dont know

 

copy to court and claimant solicitor.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Packlink/Evri lost my £850 parcel - court claim to Evri - new Mcol system
  • 2 weeks later...

Is there a claim status page?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

try to help us by properly redacting and making a multipage PDF

done it for you.

read upload next time please

 

was due the 10th.

only 4 days since then

often courts take weeks to process N180's

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

give it a week

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Could you give us the date of the appointment please or is it a secret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the moment start doing lots of reading. Even if you think you have done enough, go over it all again. Concentrating on the rights of third parties which I seem to remember is the big issue in your claim.

 

Stand by for a further response tomorrow

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay so you have a mediation appointment in approximately two weeks. You haven't been asked to file any documents yet – no court bundle et cetera. That would normally come if and when you are notified of a trial date.

So for the moment EVRi is going to put you through the usual time wasting and resource wasting exercise of going through the mediation ritual. They will try to knock you down. Of course they will start off by saying that you don't have a contract with them and you are suing the wrong people. Hopefully you know the answers to that and I think that you should be quite abrupt and assertive. So forget you will be talking to a mediator who wasn't personally involved – but however, the messages that you relay through the mediator should be short. Don't stop giving fantastic explanations and spending a lot of time making wordy replies.

Stand your ground for every last penny. Don't give up a single inch including all of your costs and also insist on interest if you have claimed that in your claim form – I can't quite remember.

When the mediator tries to put pressure on you to compromise you should tell the mediator that they are exceeding their authority and that they are advising you to compromise on your statutory rights and that this is not acceptable.

Tell them that the only compromise would be that you won't go to trial and therefore EVRi won't have a judgement against them on the issue of third party rights so that they will be able to keep on conning all sorts of other innocent customers on the same issue.

If you do your reading then you will understand exactly the situation. Ask us questions. Don't forget that the mediation is nothing formal. You just talk to somebody on the telephone and then they relay messages and then they come back to you.
However, if you feel the slightest bit of pressure from the mediator then you should be assertive with the mediator and say to them that you don't think it is their job to put pressure and that they are simply there to pass messages.
And the message for EVRi is pay me all my money – every last penny – or else we go to court. End of story

 

Incidentally, here is something that we haven't suggested before.

When EVRi says that you should be suing Packlink – tell the mediator to tell EVRi that you are enforcing your rights under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act – but that if EVRi want to involve Packlink then it is always open to them to apply to have Packlink joined to the claim as a co-defendant.
Of course EVRi won't like that. Dear me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...