Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • PAPLOC = Pre Action Protocol Letter Of Claim. Heres a handy guide to sme of the acronyms you'll see on the forum... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/147286-posting-in-this-forum-and-a-z-of-motoring-terms/#comment-4399743  
    • Thames Water is lobbying for higher bills and lower fines to avoid bailout   Thames Water is lobbying for higher bills and lower fines to avoid bailout, report claims – business live | Business | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Britain’s largest water company is trying to avoid a potential multibillion-pound taxpayer bailout   despite giving out large dividends to shareholders and large bonuses to senior management UK water company dividends jump to £1.4bn despite criticism over sewage outflows WWW.FT.COM Payments include internal transfers between complex web of holding companies   In charts: how privatisation drained Thames Water’s coffers | Utilities | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Decades of underinvestment and bumper dividends have left the firm debt-laden and under investigation   ‘The whole thing stinks’: water firms to pay £15bn to shareholders as customers foot sewage bill | Water bills | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM With cost of cleanup to be passed on to bill payers, analysis shows they will also pay £624 more by 2030 to fund investor payouts    
    • Are you still claiming Tax Credits / Universal Credit? They will likely take a small monthly amount off , if you are
    • So much for protecting our borders - Guv all just dog whistles   Office for the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration to have budget slashed - Neal The Office for the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration will have its budget cut by five per cent year on year, David Neal has revealed, Holly Bancroft reports. Mr Neal is giving evidence to the Home Affairs Committee in a one-off session on immigration after being sacked by James Cleverly. The home secretary said Mr Neal had “breached the terms of appointment and lost the confidence of the home secretary” after Mr Neal warned of “dangerous” failings by border force that he claimed were allowing “high-risk” aircraft to land in Britain without security checks. The Home Office had “categorically rejected” the claims, saying that Mr Neal “has chosen to put misleading data into the public domain”. You can read more here: Home Office sacks immigration chief after criticism of border security
    • "In an explosive revelation, Mr Staunton also alleged that the current Post Office CEO threatened to resign over a HR investigation into his own conduct. Mr Staunton said Post Office chief executive Nick Read had fallen out with the HR director “and she produced a document that was 80 pages in length” and there was just one paragraph in there about his own conduct and use of “politically incorrect comments”. Mr Staunton said Mr Read was “really quite upset” and threatened to resign a number of times. But just an hour before Mr Staunton’s testimony, Mr Read had denied - under oath - that he had ever having tried to resign."   I’m victim of smear campaign says sacked Post Office chair as he accuses CEO of lying WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Henry Staunton, sacked by business secretary Kemi Badenoch, gives evidence to Commons committee     see also from the post above "Carl Creswell, an official from the Department for Business and Trade said Tidswell had told Ben Tidswell that some board members might resign if Henry Staunton were not sacked)" Tidswell says he was right (See 11.14am.)"   So baden-ouch seems to be at the very least twisting the truth - no surprise there    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows/Drydens Salford Claimform - Old New Wave Capital Business Debt with Personal Guarantee? - help required with defence


Nic369
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Capquest/drydens claimform- capital on tap/New Wave Capital Card debt Personal Guarantee debt - Page 2 - Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group

 

Drydens has taken me to court, got a couple of days left to reply, (yes left it too late)  can anyone direct me to a suitable defence as I didn't agree to personal guarantee knowingly as they provided me with a card without me applying for it, need some formal defence format, thanks if you can help

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete this:

 

Did you complete acknowledgement of service by day 19 from the date on that claimform?

 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok-

someone may make this neater than me - but having dealt with them a lot - the burden of proof is on them - to prove their claim and prove the loss 

 

so defence would be 

1) I did not provide a personal guarantee for ltd Co xxx and there is no amount outstanding for £516.50

 

2) I have not received any assignment letter that entitles the claimant to bring any action (or have you ?)

 

3) I did not agree to indemnify Ltd Co xxxxx

 

4) no agreement for xxxxxx has been provided or signed by myself. 
 

5) no amount is outstanding 

 

 

then once submitted - do a CPR 31.14 letter - requesting 

1) personal guarantee document xxxxxx

and the IP address where it was allegedly signed

 

2) assignment letter for arrow global

 

3)proper creditor statement of account including all details 

opening balance and charges ,

repayments 

 

 

 

personally I know that what they don’t seem to have at new wave is the creditor statements to prove the amount  they claim -

which maybe is why they sell on and they don’t have proof of IP where it was signed like a docusign document -

they just put your typed name in which is why people aren’t aware - it’s not even a wet signature 


 

that’s the start really - if they don’t reply with what you need (crucially the proper statement of account to prove loss) in the 12 plus days to letter CPR 31.14 I would apply for a stay or strike out until they do 

 

someone might have more info than this but their weakness 

a) proving you signed it

b) proving amount outstanding 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be best to just file our standard Holding/no paperwork defence and save the rest till later in the process and get a cca request and cpr request running. make them disclose everything.

 

notice this is a manual claim via northants bulk .. very rare!

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with New Wave Capital. However the Defendant does not recognise this specific account number or any outstanding debt relating to this account number that the Claimant refers to and the Claimant has not stated the date this agreement is alleged to have occurred. The Defendant has therefore sought clarity from the claimant by way of a section 7X request and a CPR 31.14 request.

 

The Claimant states that the account was assigned from New Wave Capital to Arrow Global Ltd but does not mention the date this occurred. I have no recollection of ever receiving a Notice of Assignment in the prescribed format and I do not recall the precise details of the Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) and therefore requested a further copy from the claimant which they have yet to provide.

 

It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(A) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and:

(B) Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for and:

(C) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to section 88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and:

(D) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has a right to lay claim due to contraventions of section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant at this time is entitled to the relief.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't rush this

you can easily wait till over the w/end and file is by email.

 

let @Andyorch look things over as we dont see many of these here

you took out a credit card under your Ltd Company name, which they also claim had you sign a personal guarantee.

thats what they are trying to enforce. fat chance

 

sound abit like the travis perkins claims and the screw fix claims here.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to wait until Nic decides to complete the link...you can't defend a claim without the full details of the debt and history.

 

When you're ready Nic third request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you need to answer the questions with your responses and paste back here...we know nothing of the history of the debt its impossible to advise on a defence if we only have the court claim particulars...what's your side of the story?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Which Court have you received the claim from ? CCMCC Salford

 

Name of the Claimant ? Arrow Global Limited

 

Date of issue – 19/10/2022

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Details as per pdf form

(NO WE ASK YOU TYPE IT OUT !! I'll do it for you-DX)

 

 1. The claimant's claim is in the amount of £516.50 in respect of monies owed under a personal guarantee in respect of the obligations of  (my Ltd Company) .

 

2.The balance owed was assigned from New Wave Capital Limited to the Claimant, and the defendant has been notified of the assignment by letter.

 

3.The basis of the guarantee was that the defendant(s) agreed to indemnify the claimant in respect of the liabilities of the company

 

4.Under the agreement xxxxx the guarantor agreed payment of all monies due and owing to the original creditor or any subsequent assignees. The company has failed to repay the amount owing and a formal demand for payment was therefore sent to the defendant.

 

5. the defendant has failed to repay the amount owing under the guarantee and remains indebted to the claimant in the amount claimed.

 

What is the total value of the claim? £516.50
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No, if have really can’t remember, had a total hip replacement operation on 9th August, prior to that have been in severe pain, had a letter in May which I thought was a very old debt, thought I would see if anything came from it did not contact them as had no recollection of debt, was a transfer of account.
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? 

I opened a business account with Cashplus and got sent it as part of the account, it was like a addition to the account

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No Nothing at all 

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. The purchaser
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment No
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
 

Why did you cease payments? Haven’t made a payment
 

What was the date of your last payment? N/A
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

letter_1-05-2022 transfer to drydens.pdf

claimform (3).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Arrows/Drydens Salford Claimform - Old New Wave Capital Business Debt with Personal Guarantee? - help required with defence

have you sent drydens a CPR 31;14 yet?

 

what other documents/letters did you get before you got the claimform?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get this running

 

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

 type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.do not ever use or give an email
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this it?

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with New Wave Capital. However the Defendant does not recognise this specific account number or any outstanding debt relating to this account number that the Claimant refers to and the Claimant has not stated the date this agreement is alleged to have occurred. The Defendant has therefore sought clarity from the claimant by way of a section 7X request and a CPR 31.14 request.

 

The Claimant states that the account was assigned from New Wave Capital to Arrow Global Ltd but does not mention the date this occurred. I have no recollection of ever receiving a Notice of Assignment in the prescribed format and I do not recall the precise details of the Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) and therefore requested a further copy from the claimant which they have yet to provide.

 

It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(A) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and:

(B) Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for and:

(C) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to section 88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and:

(D) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has a right to lay claim due to contraventions of section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant at this time is entitled to the relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...