Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caught using freedom pass for 10 days.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have read everything in this forum about using someone’s freedom pass and how to appeal.

I followed your instructions and replied for letter.

 

Today I received an email from investigation and appeal team which says:

“I have again reviewed your case and whilst I note you are willing to pay our associated costs and fares avoided in this matter, there is no legal justification to allow an individual to pay costs so as to avoid a criminal record, unless you can point out the legal legislation in law that would allow this option.

 

The offence you will be charged with if we continue, will be a regulatory offence and does not require intent, therefore this conviction is not shared by TfL with the Police and would not show up on a standard DBS check. 

However if a passenger is convicted of this type of offence and was required to have an enhanced DBS check, then the conviction could possibly show up.

 

TfL consider such mitigation but are unable to pursue a policy where the impact on individuals in certain types of professions alone is taken into account in reaching a decision to prosecute. This could lead to discriminatory practises where specified professionals are not dealt with consistently with other members of the public acting in a similar manner. It is appropriate and right that an authority or employer should have to hand any information required so as to appraise a persons suitability for any given position.

 

For the reasons above, I have considered your particular circumstances balanced against the use of this pass in question and in my view I do not accept that a Warning as set out in the Transport for London enforcement policy applies in this case. I am sorry that I was unable to give you a more favourable reply.“

 

what do you think will happen now? 
Is there anything I can do ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we see your grovelling letter please?

and their reply in full as a pdf?

read upload

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t understand why they saying   :

“The offence you will be charged with if we continue, will be a regulatory offence and does not require intent, therefore this conviction is not shared by TfL with the Police and would not show up on a standard DBS check. However if a passenger is convicted of this type of offence and was required to have an enhanced DBS check, then the conviction could possibly show up.” 

 

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

@London1990 answered on your existing thread

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, anna1980 said:

I don’t understand why they saying   :

“The offence you will be charged with if we continue, will be a regulatory offence and does not require intent, therefore this conviction is not shared by TfL with the Police and would not show up on a standard DBS check.

 

However if a passenger is convicted of this type of offence and was required to have an enhanced DBS check, then the conviction could possibly show up.” 

 

 

read CAREFULLY what they are saying....

if they go no further or accept an OOC then it wont show anywhere as its a private matter between TfL and you.

 

However IF it goes to court AND you do get convicted THEN it will show, the conviction is nothing to do with TfL doing it, it would be a magistrates court conviction, thus a criminal one, for which you would get a criminal record.

 

however again, at least twice here, even if does goto court, the judge might simply fine you/tell you to pay what TfL are asking for... and not require it to be recorded. which is why you select you plead guilty and wish to appear if/when you get a summons.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

they have 6mts.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you replied end of july, i would, going by all the evidence here, have expected you to have heard back by now, as you have not, i suspect they have dropped it.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got the letter today.

 

I need to appear in court on 22/12/2022 to answer the following charge. 


They checked card and informed me that I made 47 unpaid journeys which totalling £184.50 fare had been avoided.

 

I do not agree with them and luckily I have a proof that from end of May till mid June I was away on holiday and it was my mum using her own card. Obviously then amount of avoided fares will be different. 


It says in the letter that application will be made in a court for £375 contribution toward the cost of TFL.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then immediately email TfL with the proof.

 

So does this still result back to 10  your 10ish uses?, removing those journeys above?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the magistrates convict you then you will have a criminal record. Because the court has found you guilty of committing a crime.

 

The offence can remain on police records indefinitely but what matters is whether you have to disclose it.

 

If you get a fine then you only have to disclose it, eg to insurers, for 12 months from date of conviction. After that it is "spent" and you can legally ignore it.

 

But note that for certain jobs eg working with children, the rules are different.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, anna1980 said:

It wasn’t 10 uses, it was 10 day go to work and back.

because it will be court case does that mean it will show on my record? 

 

To be precise  I used card only 13 times. I just checked the statement they have sent to me. I only used it on the way back from work. They count each trip £6.30 (max daily fare) 

 

19 hours ago, dx100uk said:

Then immediately email TfL with the proof.

So does this still result back to 10  your 10ish uses?, removing those journeys above?

Dx

 

It was only 13 uses by me. They added 44 more trips which my mum was using the card.

 

Luckily I can prove this.

I did sent an email with proof to the investigator.

 

I am not sure if he can change anything as letter was already sent with court date.

 

I definitely won’t accept committing 47 offence but only 13. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may limit the penalty by admitting the uses that were yours, and showing that the others couldn’t have been you.

 

It won’t change the fact that you’ll have a conviction though, unless you can persuade them to seek an administrative (“out of court”) settlement - which it seems they have been offering less often recently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what letter did you send to the court?

what did you say?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t send anything to the court. 
I thought that TFL already send all my correspondence with TfL which I attached here before. Now I need to send two forms (see attachment)ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND NOTICE OF PLEA FORM.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a sep list of the 47 TIC's that you have to sign each one?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...