Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
    • Thanks for uploading the appeal.  It was a waste of time but well done in not outing the driver. Why have your friends paid £60 they don't owe to a cowboy private company that have no means of making them pay as they don't do court?  If they paid by card, as I presume they did, they should get on to their bank and do a chargeback immediately. We call the £70 the Unicorn Food Tax.  The law specifically states they are only allowed to charge the original £100 but the PPCs and their bezzies in their trade associations allow this made-up extra £70 so £100 becomes £170.  Unfortunately for them the law doesn't. Anyway, snotty letter time. There is an example in post 32 here you can tweak as it's the same company but a different car park   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/463964-alliance-anpr-pcn-lease-car-appeals-refused-daymer-bay-cornwall/page/2/#comments  
    • Thank god you're not a part of the tribunal! Terribly biased and negative.  HR isn't all knowing. And this case proves it. Thanks again for your opinion.  I'm not going to court because of a few emails, I'm going to court because the head of HR has invented a PCP solely for me, which no other employee is made to sit. The language used in the emails is discriminatory and inflammatory.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Emails from DrydensFairfax and letters from Erudio at the same time - re. Old style student loans


Gentleshark77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I took out the old-style student loans from 1998 - 2001. I always deferred as I never earnt above the threshold. 

 

I last deferred in 2013.  In 2014 I filled in the deferment forms, however I lived overseas from 2015 until 2016 and I don't think I ever received proper notification that slc loans were being managed by Erudio. 

 

I have had big gaps in communication from Erudio - however they have recently written to me - a standard letter saying that this is a notice of sums in arrears and I'm behind in payments. And contact details if I want to discuss the state of my account with them.

 

Last week, Dryden solicitors have contacted me. I received an email from a Technical Litigation Officer at Dryden Fairfax. "further legal proceedings may commence without further notice.  This may include an application to the Court to progress the legal action commenced against you. It is also likely that any such application will include an Application for Summary Judgment."

 

I'm confused why I'm hearing from both organisations. What shall I do? I thought about asking Erudio for proof that the sent me a deferment form. Also asking the FCA and Financial ombudsman for advice.  

 

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Statute barred as 6 years has passed between last ackowledgement of the debt and the current date. Presuming 2014 deferment form is the last acknowledgement.

 

Would suggest notifying them that the old style mortgage loans are subject to limitations act and they are statute barred.  And you will vigoursly defend, if they issued a court claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like they have already issued a court claim to an old address and they successfully got a backdoor CCJ because you did not defend.

 

have you checked your UK credit file?

 

if you last SUCCESSFULLY deferred in 2013 the debt was already statute barred by the time they issued the claimform.

 

std practice for erudio. sadly.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well spotted dx !  "further legal proceedings may commence without further notice.  This may include an application to the Court to progress the legal action commenced against you "

 

This does suggest they already have a CCJ.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dryden's are solicitors for erudio, both are part of the Arrows DCA group 

 

Can you answer my questions please?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked my UK credit file and there appears to be no ccj - I looked at experian and equifax and no CCJs. 

 

Shall I respond to the Erudio letter first and I wondered why Dryden are emailing?

 

Unsure what to do next. 

 

I think I need to find out what records the SLC have about my last deferment date. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are all your old addresses showing in linked addresses section ?

 

If so then this seems like a ruse Dryden's have used several times just to get a response 

 

If you have been getting notice of sums in arrears, then that means they have also adding unlawful fees 

 

To check your deferment, see if you can get onto the SLC portal many still can 

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I've checked my online SLC account now - and have an 'End of Deferment Pack from - December 2013 - then nothing further.

 

And before that -  they contacted me was on 4 November 2013 - the letter says that the loan from 97 is deferred for a period ending on 27 December 2013. And if I want to further defer I need to fill in the enclosed form. If I have any further questions I need to contact Thesis Servicing. 

 

There was nothing about 98, 99 and 00 loans and no mention of Erudio. 

 

I don't think I was ever notified that Erudio were taking over the loans. I don't have any letters. 

 

Is it worth asking Erudio what paperwork they have? Is it worth complaining to the Financial Ombudsman and FCA?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send SAR's to Erudio and SLC.

 

If it were me I would write to Drydens asking them to explain what they mean by 'further legal proceedings may commence without further notice'

 

Advise them that you have checked and there have been no previous proceedings and as the student loans are subject to limitations act, they are statute barred.   As such, if they attempted to issue a Court claim, you will defend

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Urgh - I've just been searching my old emails and I noticed I made a small payment to company called Capquest - who were administered by CapQuest - only £75 in 2017.  I guess that cancels out the SB as a defence. 

 

Well my student loan account should have been in deferment when the loans were assigned to Erudio.

I also never received a Notice of Assignment from Erudio. 

 

If I contact them what shall I say? 

 

Shall I say to Dryden that I'm sending SAR's to Erudio and SLC. If I found my SLC online portal do I need to ask SLC?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

slow down.

 

thesis are nothing to do with arrows, they are to do with ONE of your loans sold on to a company called Link Financial , again a debt buyer hidding under a diff name - thesis.

 

capquest are part of the arrows group.

so looks like you got scammed into pay something off one of the loans owned by erudio (arrows dca).

 

the govt sold off some loans before 2013 to honours/thesis, then sold the rest to erudio late 2013.

 

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you moved from the address slc had or the one on your last deferment?

if you Have , have you ever told in writing capquest,erudio or drydens of your correct and current address?

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't recall corresponding with Erudio. However I sent a change of address in 2016 to SLC and that's how  guess Capquest got in touch. 

 

Unsure what to do next?

Send my SAR to Erudio and SLC?

 

Thanks 

 

p.s I'll definitely send a donation to this fantastic website! 

Edited by Gentleshark77
adding answer to question
Link to post
Share on other sites

No capquest (arrows) scammed you by email?, SLC would not have fwded that info .

 

Dx

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

drydens are not a DCA they are a in house solicitor that act for the various trading names of Arrows Group.

 

you are correct about emails, how do they know you got them....which is why they LIE on them too, inadmissible evidence in court, a letter, containing the same lies is not.

 

you are learning!!

 

can i suggest you go read a few 10's of thread here 

type in erudio in our search of the top red banner and get reading 

 

i would for the minute kill 2 birds with one stone.

send erudio an SAR by ROYAL MAIL.

 

this will not only give them your correct address, preventing backdoor CCJ's but it will also get you everything the group holds on you.

you never know, they might not have record of the capquest payment.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...