Bailiff going against judgment rulings

[me_n_ze]

Back in 2021 I had a bailiff working for Marston, at my door..

 

he attended my home and clamped my van which was on HP finance.  The bailiff was aware during his time at my address that this vehicle was on HP but threatened to have the van towed away. The bailiff then leaves my address with the van still clamped.  He returns the next day to remove the clamp. 

 

I filled out a complaints form to the courts and had a court date.

 

In the hearing the judge ruled that clamping a HP vehicle is unlawful and also the facts that Mr bailiffs statement was floored with inaccurate facts... also Mr bailiffs bodycam video shows him threatening to tow the vehicle knowing it was on finance. 

 

Also in the hearing Mr bailiff said when he was Aware that vehicle was on HP he chose not to return to the vehicle and remove the clamp.

 

The judge in his ruling said that Mr bailiff has acted against the rules set out as a bailiff and ordered him to pay £500 from his bond and to show fresh security to the sum of £10000. This was to be done within 28days from the 13 June 2022 

 

The issue is this.... the 28 days has gone and the bailiff has made no effort to send payment. 

 

I want to know how to check if the bailiff has refreshed his security bond ? 

 

I want to know how to deal with this further, so far I have requested the information from dartford Court where Mr bailiff has his certificate. The court has not yet replied with a answer.

 

I sent another complaint form to the court about Mr bailiff failure to comply to the judges ruling and refusing to pay. 

 

Whats the best action 

 

Edited August 30, 2022 by dx100uk
BAILIFF name removed

[unclebulgaria67]

I think you have done what you can do, which is to complaint to the Court, that the Judges directions have not been followed by the Bailiff. 

[Peterbard]

So this case was brought under the fitness to hold a certificate provisions?

 

Why do you think you obtained an award?

Was there an action for damages also?

What exactly did this order say?

Presumably you have it.

If so it is just a matter for enforcement.