Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/NCO - old Vaniquis Card Debt - New wrongly dated default! **SETTLED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, SardoN said:

Hello again 

 

Hope you are all keeping well.

 

OK we have new developments;

 

First one is that Arrow Global went ahead and added a default to my credit file (which I was worried about all along) which I can only presume has been spread to all credit report agencies - I have attached snippet here

 

- The impact I don't think is that serious but my score tanked around 80 points or so.

 

Second: The SAR from Vanquis, I received it in today's post.

 

So what are my next steps from here? 

 

I haven't heard from NCO/Arrow so far, but I'm sure that their letters demanding settlement will start flooding in soon because the 30 day "hold" has now lapsed.

 

Just a quick one regarding the SAR, there is no included credit agreement like the one that Arrow/NCO sent, they've included the following:

  • Key to abbreviations (2 pages worth of acronyms)
  • Customer base view with some very detailed and personal information pertaining to myself
  • Statement balances dated back to Aug 2014 (I crossed referenced these with the ones received from NCO/Arrow and they seem to tally up)
  • Customer SMS records going again back to 2014

That's the entire SAR total of 42 pages  - I found it very strange that they did not include a CCA or the same CCA that Arrow sent me which was signed etc.

 

Regards

SN

 

default_snippet.docx 242.65 kB · 5 downloads

 

So what are my envisioned next steps ? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a good look through the account log written notes and see if vanquis mention default! Or d or dn.

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a good look through the account log in the SAR as suggested by dx and there is no note of a default, d or a dn or any mention of a default in those notes whatsoever.

 

It does look like I had an original debt with Vanquis looking through these notes, they know about very specific events that happened in my life in the last few years including bereavement etc and this is stated in the SAR account notes.

 

It appears that vanquis sold the debt to Arrow Global (managed by NCO) and did NOT apply a default on my account, they just sold it.

 

It's just odd that vanquis was not listed on my credit reports with the known credit agencies which is the sole reason why I created this thread in the first place and now Arrow added the default which I think is most certainly unlawful and a low blow generally as I am lead to believe that vanquis should have carried out that action prior to selling the account.

 

Moving on I'd like to know if there is anything I can do moving forward - There is a note in the account notes that states the following:

"06 Sep 2018  Customer sent Purchase expiry notification on 07/09/2018. Purchase rate offer will expire on 01/10/2018"

 

Arrow most certainly bought this debt probably for pennies on the pound so my question is do I cave in and resume payments to these parasites who have now hampered my credit score by applying a default unlawfully or can I contest this (maybe with ICO) which I do apologise profusely because I keep mentioning this default. 

 

Did Arrow / NCO actually have the right to add the default notice to the credit reference agencies and only last month which appeared this month? I may actually call Equifax to ask their opinion on the matter.

 

Anyway look I appreciate all the input thus far , but I'm stumped as to my next steps especially now that the debt from vanquis has confirmed to be genuine.

 

Now sure if I can go down the ICO route still ? Anyway I think from the advise given of which I have most certainly taken heed, I will keep an eye out for the post and letters from these people and will ignore until a letter of claim comes in. I'm sure they'll start making threats soon.

 

Oh, and before I forget, how strange is it that within the SAR itself, there was not CCA which Arrow had sent me which contained my signature scanned. I would have definitely thought that would have been included. How bizarre this all is.

 

It would have been nice to squish these guys. but hey can't win 'em all 🤕 

 

Regards

SN

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 05/07/2022 at 11:55, SardoN said:

I've had a good look through the account log in the SAR as suggested by dx and there is no note of a default, d or a dn or any mention of a default in those notes whatsoever.

 

It does look like I had an original debt with Vanquis looking through these notes, they know about very specific events that happened in my life in the last few years including bereavement etc and this is stated in the SAR account notes.

 

It appears that vanquis sold the debt to Arrow Global (managed by NCO) and did NOT apply a default on my account, they just sold it.

 

It's just odd that vanquis was not listed on my credit reports with the known credit agencies which is the sole reason why I created this thread in the first place and now Arrow added the default which I think is most certainly unlawful and a low blow generally as I am lead to believe that vanquis should have carried out that action prior to selling the account.

 

Moving on I'd like to know if there is anything I can do moving forward - There is a note in the account notes that states the following:

"06 Sep 2018  Customer sent Purchase expiry notification on 07/09/2018. Purchase rate offer will expire on 01/10/2018"

 

Arrow most certainly bought this debt probably for pennies on the pound so my question is do I cave in and resume payments to these parasites who have now hampered my credit score by applying a default unlawfully or can I contest this (maybe with ICO) which I do apologise profusely because I keep mentioning this default. 

 

Did Arrow / NCO actually have the right to add the default notice to the credit reference agencies and only last month which appeared this month? I may actually call Equifax to ask their opinion on the matter.

 

Anyway look I appreciate all the input thus far , but I'm stumped as to my next steps especially now that the debt from vanquis has confirmed to be genuine.

 

Now sure if I can go down the ICO route still ? Anyway I think from the advise given of which I have most certainly taken heed, I will keep an eye out for the post and letters from these people and will ignore until a letter of claim comes in. I'm sure they'll start making threats soon.

 

Oh, and before I forget, how strange is it that within the SAR itself, there was not CCA which Arrow had sent me which contained my signature scanned. I would have definitely thought that would have been included. How bizarre this all is.

 

It would have been nice to squish these guys. but hey can't win 'em all 🤕 

 

Regards

SN

 

Is this the end ? Thoughts anybody ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I know everyone has gone quiet. The nightmare situation of all of my previous concerns depicted in this thread off the offset has come to fruition. I tried to obtain a SIM card only deal with 02 as part of a broadband upgrade with Virgin Media and something kept going wrong with the 02 side, and they couldn't give me or the Virgin Media representative the information as to why it's going wrong. When I called 02 they only made reference to maybe potentially a credit check.

 

If you look in my credit file of which I will attach the PDF here. Arrow Global added a default out of the blue and you guys were aware of the situation as I was worried it was going to happen anyway. There are no previous payments, no history .. NOTHING just a DEFAULT APRIL 2022.

 

I just got off phone to Equifax and they said, how on earth can they add a default if there was no historic data in terms of payments etc and NO history of vanquis.

 

They are raising a dispute to have the entry removed based on lack of any historic data! I'm also going to raise the same dispute via Experian and TransUnion.

 

SO...

 

Anyway Arrow have gone quiet, haven't received any letters or anything since they pulled that dirty move.

 

Look, I'm gonna be blunt here. I'm not paying them anything for the stunt they pulled on me.  How dare they add a default out of the blue, considering there is no previous history regardless if they bought that debt from Vanquis in 2019.

 

If a letter of claim comes through, I'll deal with it, if it doesn't they can most certainly jog on, and that's even if they did purchase a "genuine" old debt.

 

Like I mention to you previously, if a creditor sells a debt, they should have flagged that as a default BACK THEN. There were no records of Vanquis in any or the credit agencies. We've already been over this and I obtained all these reports.. 

 

However, the SAR from Vanquis covers a different story altogether...

 

DX100UK was talking about going to the ICO at some stage, I'm not even sure if this is still applicable in my case on the basis of the information which was received via the SAR from Vanquis. Not sure if slowly slowly catch Monkey still applies in this case? It would be good to have some clarity on the situation.

 

Anyway a nightmare.. and now I can't even get a 02 SIM card for £6 per month contract. BUT, I'm not even sure if it is credit related. My score dropped 72 points from around 640 to mid 550's somewhere based on that Arrow default, would that hinder credit?

 

I've got a credit card, I've also a PayPal credit account, I make regular payments etc, in fact, I'm in good stead so I have no idea what's going on with the "something went wrong" .. it sounds as though it is credit check related though.

 

I also spoke with TransUnion and they told me blatantly that if a default was added just now in the last couple of months, of course this will affect credit and he is also of the opinion that it was a dirty move from Arrow. He said if the debt was sold in 2019 then the default should be pushed back. I'm really upset with Vanquis and Arrow to be honest.. WE have more important things going on in life than to waste time messing about with dead beat creditors. 

 

Bottom line - What an extremely low blow from the parasites over Arrow Global HQ (NCO) and anyway hope you guys still alive as everyone has gone quiet as hell.

 

Peace

SN

Default April 2022.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a response from one of the credit agencies stating that the default cannot be disputed and will remain.

 

So what can I do about this situation as a whole ? Can I approach the ICO about this or not really because of the information received via SAR ?

 

I need to speak to TransUnion to ascertain why the default cannot be disputed.

 

This is nonsense. How can they default me when the debt was sold to them in 2019.

 

"Thank you for your recent dispute about your credit report.

Unfortunately, your dispute has been unsuccessful, and the disputed information will remain on your credit report.

The information that is displayed on your credit report is provided to TransUnion by various third-party data suppliers (such as finance providers, the courts and local authorities)"

 

I don't buy it.......

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

card taken out 2014 

vanquis did not default nor terminate the A/C upon sale in 2019

debt buyer terminated the agreement

debt buyer latterly placed a D in the monthly account resume on credit files.

which is not a registered defaulted date via a default notice 

 

can a debt buyer mark your credit file after an agreement has been terminated........

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

open

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey fellow members,

I wanted to share my recent experience of resolving an old debt that was managed by NCO Europe, and purchased by Arrow Global. After a round of negotiations, I ended up with a partial settlement offer. At first, they declined, but after I shared my financial statements and expenditure breakdown, they agreed.

In hindsight, I believe I could have pushed for a lower settlement. It's known that Debt Collection Agencies (DCAs) buy debts for a small fraction of their face value, so I reckon I ended up overpaying. Case in point, I owed another creditor twice the amount, and yet I settled with them for the same sum, effectively clearing a significantly larger debt.

Despite some regrets, I can't deny the relief of no longer dealing with the constant barrage of letters and the mental strain. As Arrow Global has now been settled, they're a thing of the past and my peace of mind has been restored.

The path to settling this debt wasn't a straight one. In a surprising and disappointing turn of events, NCO Europe blindsided me by adding a default to my credit file, as you may be aware of in this thread. This manoeuvre felt like a punch to the gut, especially knowing the default would stain my credit report for six years. What's worse, they played this card three years late - the default was lodged in mid-2022 while the debt had been sold way back in late 2019.

The road to resolving this issue became more challenging when NCO Europe and Arrow Global passed the buck, suggesting I take it up with Vanquis. It felt like they were trying to sidestep responsibility, despite the fact that Vanquis had already sold the debt. Their dismissive stance added to my frustration.

However, Vanquis stepped up and advocated on my behalf. They put forth representations to both NCO Europe and the Ombudsman who I had invovled, insisting on the rightful action - backdating the default. This collaborative effort paid off, and Arrow/NCO agreed to adjust the default to a date just prior to when the debt was sold. It was a victory that restored some faith after a seemingly unfair struggle.

The impact was noticeable – once the default date was adjusted and the NCO/Arrow account closed, my credit score jumped considerably. For anyone dealing with a DCA-issued default, I recommend checking to ensure the date is correct and if not pushing for the date to be backdated, especially if your scenario mirrors mine. It can make a significant difference.

Reflecting on the debt situation with Arrow Global & NCO Europe, it seems I overpaid Arrow Global in my haste to close the debt. It was a balance just shy of £2000 - in retrospect, maybe more negotiation was needed. Yet, there's some solace in the freedom from future correspondence and energy-draining interactions with them.

On another note, I managed to clear a larger debt held directly with a bank, not a DCA. This required persistence, letters, and an appeal to their better nature. But the result? I cleared the entire balance by paying only 15% of the amount owed.

Through all this, I've learnt some invaluable lessons. Primarily, it's crucial to strive to live within one's means, and avoid falling into debt in the first place. Easier said than done, I know, but these experiences have underlined the importance of this principle.

I can't express enough how much I appreciate the support and advice you all, especially dx100uk, have provided throughout my posts. Thank you.

Best,
SN

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Arrow/NCO - old Vaniquis Card Debt - New wrongly dated default! **SETTLED**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...