Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/Overdales Claimform - old Paypal EU Credit Debt ***Claim Discontinued***


goldeneye22
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 536 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi forum.

Here on the suggestion of a family member who has had successes based on advice here in the past.

Looking for some general debt advice for two debts that Lowell bought

Very (shop direct) debt - £2400, opened in 2013, defaulted in 2019.

Have been making token payments of £1 since then.

Received a letter from Lowell's offering a 80% discount.

Pay £480 in three payments

 

Debt 2

- PayPal Credit - £505, opened in 2017, defaulted in 2019.

Sold to Lowell recently, (last 5 months).

Haven't made any payments.

Recently received a letter stating they may issue claim form within 15 days if I don't get in contact.

My first plan was to send a CCA for each account and take it from there.

I assume s.78 is the correct category for both debts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

click CCA request and read all the post 

the info is there

if lowell are offering a discount something might well smell here.

 

check if that paypal credit debt is paypal UK not paypal EU. (pre brexit )

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I figured the same when the 80% discount letter came through the door for the Very account 

 

Not sure how to check regarding PayPal. I'm assuming it is PayPal EU due to the date when I started the credit agreement being 2017. Lowell letter simply states PAYPAL regarding the name of the debt. 

 

 

Edited by goldeneye22
Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you know it's PayPal credit, you remember signing by tick box?

Got old PayPal emails ...agreement copy should be there.

PayPal eu credit rather than PayPal UK makes enforcement interesting and might answer the reason for the sale ..get it??

Dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I vaguely remember the set up process being a case of "click here to apply" and terms and conditions but can't remember much else.

 

No old emails unfortunately. Email address tied to the account was purged by Microsoft after it got hacked. Regained access but all emails gone 

 

PayPal have a service that lets you download all data they have for you so I've requested that to see if it'll also show any agreements I've made

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good do that.

 

dont do anything with it until/unless you get a letter of claim

 

As for the very one.

Shame payments are being made running the sb date to infinity.

 

Cca request.

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers mate,

wait for my data from PayPal which should take 3 days according to them on average and wait to see if Lowell follow through with a letter of claim.

Indeed annoying about the Very one.

Did not know anything regarding debts being SB and payments affecting that until recently.

Having read up on some threads, paperwork must be shot if they are willing to only accept 20% of the debt.

Will send CCA request to them tomorrow

PayPal data came back.

Didn't have any documents that I'd agreed to etc, simply stated the name of the product I signed up for which is "PP_UK_PPC" which I assume translates to "PayPal_UK_PayPal Credit".

My account was opened in 2009 but the PayPal Credit was not signed up until August 2017

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who from?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The information document they sent with my records simply states PayPal. No mention of whether it was PayPal EU or PayPal UK besides my PayPal credit application.

 

"Financial Application Status - PP_UK_PPC - Approved"

 

They did send a secondary note that simply talks about how data is handled etc. Here they mention that PayPal EU is the responsible entity, but this is simply in regards to making a complaint and seems very generic rather than it being specific to my account

 

According to the PayPal credit t&c, I can ask for a copy of the credit agreement free of charge by contacting them directly by mail or on the phone

Edited by goldeneye22
More information
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who has this info come from . PayPal or Lowell

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good well you keep all that to yourself.

Read upload

Get it all up to one mass pdf.

CCA request lowell.

Then watch the fake paperwork they send, which will be nothing like what you have got from the OC.

It concerns me you say 

On 09/02/2022 at 11:26, goldeneye22 said:

. I haven't spoken to Lowell at all regarding the PayPal account.

You never ever speak to or ring a powerless dca

- they will lie and say anything over the phone to scam you out of money.

That they will never put in writing as they would get fined for saying it.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's thanks to my brother that I hadn't spoken with them.

Never dealt with DCAs before besides Lowell.

I spoke with him about it not long ago and he told me to shut up and not talk to them at all and get on here, have a read then make a post.

What information is it that I should upload.

Regarding the PayPal account?

I only have the personal information that PayPal sent which means I'd need to redact the whole thing besides account creation date and PayPal credit application date. 

Will send CCA to Lowell regarding PayPal tomorrow too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok well let it run

To me this looks like a paypal eu credit agreement, of which, we've not seen any being enforced in our jurisdiction, which would explain why PP did not goto to court and crush you themselves.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Soz about the long time not updating.

Came home to find a fire had happened in our house, so that has taken priority since.

Between now and my last post, my PayPal debt that Lowell bought was passed to Overdales who first sent a letter that they would be acting on behalf of Lowell, and then a letter threatening a claim form being issued if I did not get in contact with them within 30 days.

That claim form was issued on Monday 18th.

My CCA Request letter sent by recorded delivery was "lost" by royal mail, so that's great, will deal with the compensation for that later.

Will resend the CCA Request on Monday to Overdales.

Will acknowledge the debt on MCOL and make an account later today.

Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre Northampton NN1

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio I LTD

Date of issue – 18th April 2022

 

Particulars of Claim

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

1 The claim is for the sum of £581.63 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of XXXXXXX

2.The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served

under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act which has not been complied with.

3.The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

4.The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the Country Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £26.13 

The claimant claims the sum of £607.76

What is the total value of the claim? £747.76

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? yes

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? PayPal Credit

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? yes

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Can't recall

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No

Why did you cease payments? couldn't afford payments due to working less hours

What was the date of your last payment? Early 2019, before account became defaulted

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell/Overdales Claimform - old Paypal Credit Debt.

this could be fun.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Looking at posting my defence tomorrow due to being away with a terminally ill friend over the next couple of weeks so looking to get this section out of the way.

How does this look for a defence?

Particulars of Claim for reference

What is the claim for – 

1 The claim is for the sum of £581.63 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of XXXXXXX

2.The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served

under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act which has not been complied with.

3.The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

4.The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the Country Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £26.13 

The claimant claims the sum of £607.76

Defence 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant.

2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim. 

3. Paragraph 3 is noted.

On the 25/04/2022 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 78 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 27/04/2022. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 78 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance.

4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and:

(b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

5. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/05/2022 at 17:20, goldeneye22 said:

1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I had an account with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant.

financial dealings 

did you not ever send a cpr 31:14 request?

i'm also wondering if a line concerning this is out of jurisdiction for eu debt?

also did overdales solicitors send you a letter of claim before they raised the claim through northants bulk court?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have the agreement details etc in your sar return do you not and posted earlier you said paypal.eu.

you should have sent cpr its detailed in the sticky you filled out with the details of the claim you put up.

get one running.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]...

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/.

type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement details weren't included in the data I got from PayPal.

It simply states that my financial credit application was successful and that the product I got was called "PP_UK_PPC".

Not a single document showing what the agreement was that I signed up for. 

i am not even sure if it is actually a full on SAR that I received.

I simply used PayPal's on site process to request the data they held for me.

I received phone numbers, bank account details, email address, addresses tied to the account but absolutely nothing about PayPal Credit besides "PP_UK_PPC".

PayPal Europe shows up as the data controller, with a UK based office.

But again that information isn't specific to my account. Even logged out, PayPal Europe shows up

I will get a CPR 31:14 sent out tomorrow.

In the mean time, what should I do regarding the defence?

I won't be at home for the next two weeks so would really like to submit it tomorrow as I leave for Wales by 3pm tomorrow

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm sure @andyorch will pop in tonight as you need to file tomorrow.

 

as they have not replied to CCA anyway twill be for the moment almost what you have posted above.

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure this type of credit agreement is a regulated CCA1974 agreement ?

 

Quote

Deemed authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The nature and extent of consumer protections may differ from those for firms based in the UK. 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...