Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Transunion showing wrong and historic financial linking to my EX


Brodiedog
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 713 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon. 

 

Full background. 

I used to be in a relationship with someone, her name isn't relevant so I'll call her Brian for the sake of this post.

We owned a house together and she was added to my bank account making it a joint account. At some point we separated,

 

in 2016 the property was sold, our finances separated, we went into the relevant banks and filled in the forms, my joint accounts reverted to sole ownership in my name and we parted ways. At no point were any of our finances ever in arrears, no payments missed, no defaults etc etc, Since 2016 we have had no contact, last I heard she was living on a canal boat somewhere in Norfolk. I have no address or contact number for her.

 

Fast forwards to today.

I'm self employed and I'm trying to improve my credit score a little and I subscribed to checkmyfile to see if I can work out what's dragging my score down, and I discover that Transunion has a financial association with Brian and when I move the sliding scale thing to see how this is affecting my credit score with transunion, it makes a HUGE difference. 

Clearly this is an error, I have no financial links with her at all and have not since we parted ways in 2016.

 

I also create a Credit karma account as this is specifically a transunion report, and it's also reported there. Transunion states it is a Barclays account. I have never ever had a barclays account. Transunion states the account association originated on the 1 September 2012 and was then later confirmed on the 6 Feb 2010. No that's not a typo on my part, unless transunion have a time machine that can confirm a financial association on an account that doesn't exist two years before it was created, then something is obviously wrong.

 

I raised a dispute with transunion and the information I got back is that this entry relates to an account number that is a nationwide account, which is one of my two current accounts with nationwide that I use and that nationwide are reporting it as a joint account and so the dispute is rejected as the information is correct.

 

I've been to nationwide. I've spent around two hours in the branch with some very helpful staff who have scratched their heads to get to the bottom of this. 

The upshot is that I have been given:

Screen printouts from the Nationwide account management system (which as a customer I have no access to), showing the account status as sole ownership in my name. Current statement printouts showing the account in my name only. Historic statements showing the account in my name only. A statement of fees for account showing it as sole ownership in my name only. A statement from August 2016 showing the account in joint names with myself and Brian, And a following statement from September 2016 showing that the account has been changed to sole ownership in my name only. All of these supporting documents have been stamped with the branch stamp, dated and signed by the manager lady who spent ages trying to sort this out for me. 

 

After a lot of ringing other departments, she also assured me that this account is not being reported as a joint account, it is on all the systems she is able to check on reported as a sole ownership account in my name only. She said that the information that goes to the credit reference agencies is a data dump taken from the account management system, where it it clearly not reported as a joint account. And that the same data file goes to all the credit agencies, it's also not possible for different data agencies to get different information for the same account, and as Experian and Equifax both report this account correctly, the correct information is leaving their systems and the issue is with Transunion.

 

I have raised a second dispute with transunion and supplied them with all the supporting documents from the bank showing that this account is

A. A nationwide account and not a Barclays account 

B. Categorically not a joint account with Brian and is a sole ownership account in my name

C. The dates are clearly wrong

D. Experience and Equifax report the account correctly

 

And again they have rejected the dispute stating that the account is reported as a joint account and the information they show is correct. I still have a financial association with Brian on a nationwide account that is solely in my name since 2016, is reported as a barclays account with wrong dates that is harming my credit score and transunion refuse to acknowledge all the documentation I have from the bank. I have raised a complaint procedure with nationwide to get it investigated and have not heard back from this yet. 

 

I was going to wait till I get a response from the bank complaint and then contact the bank ombudsman, although I'm not sure if they have any authority over the credit reference  agencies, and the issue seems to be with transunion rather than my bank. 

 

Anyone able to help with this?

 

Despite the latest communication stating that the dispute has been rejected because the account has been updated by Nationwide in Dec 21 as a joint account, the latest Transunion report (Dec 21) still reports it as a Barclays and last reported in September 2012.

 

I've been told that the banking ombudsman doesn't have any jurisdiction over credit reference agencies.

Any advice will be gratefully received.

 

Nick

 

Any suggestions  on what my next step to resolve this will be very gratefully received.

 

Nicholas 

 

 

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Anyone able to help with this?

 

Despite the latest communication stating that the dispute has been rejected because the account has been updated by Nationwide in Dec 21 as a joint account, the latest Transunion report (Dec 21) still reports it as a Barclays and last reported in September 2012.

 

I've been told that the banking ombudsman doesn't have any jurisdiction over credit reference agencies.

Any advice will be gratefully received.

 

Nick

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

start a complaint with the FOS.

and it might pay you to go contact the ICO too first

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Transunion showing wrong and historic financial linking to my EX

Thank you. I had been told the FOS had no jurisdiction here, but I will start a complaint with them and see what they say. 

ICO. Information commissioners office? I will do that too.

Thanks.

 

Ill update here when I get a response.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go speak to the ICO 1st.

they sometimes can wave a magic wand and give a quick call to whomever and problem gets solved.

 

though i will say, you obviously DID have a financial linking with your EX, the fact TU (credit kalma?) have or are giving the wrong say bank a/c or mortgage details might be immaterial.

 

mine from 2008 still shows, but it certainly has/never had any effect upon my score even though they had/have numerous CCJ's, so are a 'risk' to be associated with to this day.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Open

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the long delay on following this up,  Ive been waiting for the results of actions I was promised.

 

After this post I found a telephone number for the ICO and rang them to get some advice on the correct procedure to follow raising this with them.

 

The lady I spoke to said that the ICO had a huge backlog currently, and that what she advised in the first instance, was to log an official written complaint with the nationwide bank.

 

This would then get followed up by technical team who would be able to look at the specifics of this particular issue,

 

and that if this did not resolve the issue, OR the bank did not respond with an acceptable response within the required time frame, 

 

then to come back and to log the complaint with the ICO and they would then take up both the information issue and the lack of response within the legally specified time limit.

 

So a complaint was logged with the nationwide bank and eventually a customer resolutions manager got in touch with me

 

nationwide had found some mistakes in the way some of their different systems were incorrectly reporting the account, while all the systems customer service teams were able to access reported it correctly.

 

He told me his team had spent quite a time going over the systems and had removed a number of instances where the incorrect information was recorded and that he couldnt give me a reason why this had not happened automatically.

 

He awarded me £250 as compensation and told me that the data on Transunion would be updated within the next 6 to 8 weeks and followed this up with a letter.

 

SIve waited a a few months, and nothing has changed

 

I rang the bank and after being put through about 4 different people, was told that it can take some time for all the relevant systems to synchronise with each other before the correct data was reported to Transunion. 

 

Ive waited a couple more cycles.

And the data on Transunion has not changed.

 

 I have telephoned Transunion to follow it up and been told that the account is STILL currently being reported as a joint account by Nationwide, and he cant tell me why Transunion display it as a Barclays account with incorrect dates.

 

As of today there is now a complaint logged with the ICO but the lady on the phone told me that there is a huge backlog and it could be three months or more before its assigned to a complaints officer who will then handle the complaint.

 

Im £250 better off, but to be honest Id rather just have the correct information on my credit account because it is causing me issues.

 

I had to fill in a financial application form with my partner recently, and this was literally the first thing that was flagged up when they did a credit check and I had to explain it all to them.

 

 Im back waiting again...

 

Any further advice on anything else I can do wil be gratefully received.

Nick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complaint with FOS? now you've made contact with ICO

 

Check with CRA if closing the troublesome account would help? and do it if so

CAG Site Team and Forum Helpers are unpaid volunteers

Over the years CAG has probably helped hundreds of thousands of people, only a small number of people come back and let us know what happened or to say thank you

and an even smaller number of people ever think to make a donation.

If you are able, without leaving yourself short, consider donating, all donations go towards Site hosting and maintenance - help us stay live for future people in need.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

 

Essential Reading: Dealing with Customer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have written proof of the resolution from nationwide?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes absolutely.

The text is as follows:(identifying info removed)

 

Our response to your complaint

 

 

Dear xxxx

I am sorry that you have had to raise concerns regarding your Credit File issues and thank you for your patience whilst I have investigated your concerns.

Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today regarding these concerns.

Your concerns

As I understand, you raised concerns that your credit file had shown that there was an association with a previous joint account holder despite them being requested to be removed in 2016.

Our findings

I have received confirmation that the joint account holder, Miss BRIAN was not fully removed from the current account and her details remain associated with the account until now.

This has been manually updated this week and details sent to TransUnion for their records to be updated. I would hope that they would take the information and backdate this to 2016 however, I suggested that it may be in your interests to contact TransUnion directly to ensure this is done.

This letter is confirmation that this administrative error has been caused by Nationwide but if you require any further documentation to assist with your Credit File, please do not hesitate to contact me.

I have sent a request for all associated financial details to be removed from your profile and this will be processed and TransUnion notified within the next 6 - 8 weeks.

Our decision

You advised that upon reflection, you have been affected by this over the years when applying for credit and I would like to apologise for any inconvenience or confusion caused by this.

In upholding your concerns, I have arranged for £250.00 compensation to be credited to your current account ending xxxx, this will appear as a credit from sundries on your statement by close of business on Monday 14 February 2022.

Your information

The information you provide will be held by Nationwide. We’ll use it to process your complaint and resolve your concerns.

Your rights

You have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge – but you must do so within six months of the date of this letter.  I’ve included a link to their leaflet, or you can visit their website – www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk

If you do not refer your complaint in time, the Ombudsman will not have our permission to consider your complaint and so will only be able to do so in very limited circumstances.  For example, if the Ombudsman believes that the delay was as a result of exceptional circumstances.

Next steps

As previously explained, this letter is to confirm you’ve accepted the proposed outcome and we now consider your complaint to be resolved.  If there’s anything you’d like to discuss further, please reply to this message by sending an email to me at MS&[email protected] or you can contact me on 00000000000.

Your complaint has been logged in accordance with our internal complaints policy. Our strategic root cause team will therefore be able to access your concerns if required, to identify trends in member dissatisfaction and identify improvements to our products and processes. While we cannot guarantee your case will be reviewed, we take member concerns seriously and therefore are constantly looking to identify areas of improvement.

Yours sincerely

Chris Hemming

Member Relations Consultant

Member Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

A copy of that to transunion should get it fixed in 24 hrs imho.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I dont really want to close the account as I use it for quite a few bills and direct debits, and if I close it Ill have to open another one which will have yet another negative effect on my credit reference rating.

 

I have been in contact with Transunion and they have a copy of the letter.

 

They say that they can remove the entry, however it will not achieve anything as the entry will simply be reinstated on the next monthly cycle because Nationwide are still actively reporting it as a joint account on each monthly update.

 

So because of this, although they can, they are reluctant (read not willing...) to remove it while nationwide are still reporting it as a joint account.

 

They still cant tell me why its reported on my credit reference as a Barclays account though.

 

So im back to waiting for the ICA, but as of today Ive also logged a complaint with the Ombudsman.

 

As soon as I hear back from the ombudsman or the ICO I will update this.

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It seems to be a transunion problem as l know several people who are have TU issues but they were not there when it was Credit Karma. 

Eg my name

they are refusing to accept they are the only credit reporting company that has my name wrong even saying how the bank has been telling them its a name l have not used for nearly 21 years been to bank,

l was not even with that bank 21 yrs ago, and provided them all the info they have investigated and they gave me all the info logged a complaint and even that showed the bank were not at fault.

Gave all the info to TU they still dont accept they are wrong.

Logged a FOC ICO etc complaint ICO got info from TU saying they were now using my correct name 3 months after the complaint lodged.

Then l found out that TU has changed my middle name and they dont accept that even though their own records show that when KC it was correct and before l lodged my last name complaint it was correct and they say its bank.

its not as the previous complaint says its not. Now they have again suddenly changed the info to correct info. 

just waiting for it to change back. 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...