Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot/Restons MBNA Card CCJ and i didnt know i had it. ***Resolved***


hitchy1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My credit file states no court orders or adverse.

I cant match the reference number on the letter to the reference number on the ccj and i have no previous letters, cards or other ways of checking.

 

I’m fairly confident its the same debt but cant be 100% certain.

Ive always felt that if and when the time came I would have to settle as although they didn't have proof i was unaware of the case and they got the judgement.

 

I still don’t believe the debt was mine but not sure how i move forward.

They have the judgement so I assume i have to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

no you don't have to pay 

but you certainly need to tell them of you correct address

I've merged the threads as you appear to say its the same amount as the CCJ

though you say the CCJ is not showing?
are all your past addresses showing on your credit file?

 

as with that robbersway and ex Barclaycard debt thread advises you should really be writing to everyone that owns any of your old debts paid or used within the last 7 yrs informing them of your correct and present address.

else more backdoor CCJ's will be gained.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I genuinely don't know who may have a claim as it was with a dmp that was with my ex. I have no paperwork or current credit and my file does not show the ccj or all my old addresses. 
My biggest concern now is they surely will want payment. Should I confirm my address and query the debt then wait for next steps?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so your old addresses are not showing on your credit file?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just checked again, there is no adverse credit showing and my address is out of date even though i updated the electoral role when i moved a couple of years back. The only searches are from energy providers and the score is fair. I have no credit and no previous credit showing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you need to contact whichever credit file provider you are using asking them to update your file with all these addresses (list them)

then to alert you when its done

you can possibly do this by messenger system on your account.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO you need to write to them informing them of your present and correct address 

head the letter with their ref number.

 

2nd class will do 

get free POP at your local PO counter.

 

the other thing that shows in your threads

is there were 2 MBNA cards one was an old abbey card?

the other was....this one?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just address 

ball is then in their court.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have.now sent two letters to Cabot and both have been ignored.

 

I have now received another letter which looks pretty standard stating we have now confirmed your address,

you have taken the first step and suggesting i set up-an account and start paying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good, so now ignore them too until/unless you get a letter of claim?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Still had no written response but have now received a couple of texts stating that a personal letter is waiting for me and i may find it useful to log on via the link.

 

I’m curious but also reluctant as I feel that any communication could be done by letter in response to mine.

 

Any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct

 

ignore them till they write.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, that didn’t take long.

I have now received a letter from them with a stack of paperwork claiming for 2 accounts.

The main one explains the account which is on ccj

last paid via stepchange in July 2013 and then subsequently The ccj obtained via Restons in 2016 due to my lack of defence.

The original credit agreement dated 2003 is included.


The other account they state has no documentation but they believe i owe it due to payments via stepchange.

The inference is they want to work with me on a suitable payment.

 

The remainder of the documentation shows payments via stepchange stopped in 2013 and various cc statements none with any signatures or showing who made the payment.

 

I’m 100% sure that no payment to stepchange came from my accounts they were all from my ex.

 

I’m  guessing the account with ccj I need to find a suitable payment solution and the other account i send a prove it letter?
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the pointless prove it letters - just stupid letter tennis.

 

so what were the debts?

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One is the mbna credit card which Restons obtained the ccj on in 2016. Presumably i have to do something about this to avoid possible bailiffs?
The other is stated as Barclaycard which they advise they have no documentation but believe i owe It as paid via stepchange in July 2013. Is this not statute barred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant see a thread on this reston and who's CCJ ...??

if its anything like your old HFC loan, you got cash cowed blind as they charged your post judgemental interest when there was no order too.

 

as for the BC one...no paperwork - no pay ignore them.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, this thread is a bit confusing

 

effectively i found out a couple of years ago that i had a ccj which was obtained by Restons solicitors on behalf of Cabot in Feb 2016. 

 

A few months ago Cabot contacted me to confirm my address

after a couple of letters back and forth as per advice

 

they have now sent a letter explaining i owe this money and I should contact them.

Additionally they added the details about the Barclaycard but no evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who said blindly enter into stupid letter tennis??

 

Quite honestly until you get notification that any of your ,CCJ owners are returning to court to enforce a judgement

I'd stop paying everyone on any historic debts

As long as you've written telling them of you correct address

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just to be clear in post 58 you advised writing to them and giving my correct address which i did and they ignored it.

I sent a second letter and that was also ignored until now.

 

 I haven’t had any other communication and any payment made was in 2013 from my ex’s account via Stepchange. 

I haven't offered or made any payments to anyone since then.


Just to be clear are you saying that unless I'm contacted about enforcing a judgement I ignore any further communication? They do state that normal collection processes will commence if they don't hear from me in 21 days.

 

Also i do appreciate your advice and I will be making a donation because the work you do is brilliant.

 

Apologies that my explanations aren’t always clear but it is a bit daunting.

I thought i was back on my feet after a disastrous divorce in 2013 but i got the ccj so have to face up to the fact it may be enforced. Thanks again.

 

Donation made, thanks very much. Hopefully others will donate as this site needs to continue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:yo:

 

i think you're doing the best move.

 

sorry i read there were payments must have been another thread

no you are safe .

 

just ignore their silly tyranny 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they would have to return to a court and that court would inform you of such request.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What concerns me is that although the ccj was obtained in Feb 2016 it is only because they didn't have my address that further action probably wasn't taken until now.

 

It's evident that I wouldn't have grounds for a set aside so presumably they have a further 2 years to attempt recovery?

 

On the original ccj there was a court fee of £410 and £100 solicitors fee added to the total.

The fact they have now sent me the info and hold me responsible (which in the eyes of the law i am)

why would they not simply apply back to court for enforcement and then add more costs for doing this,

 

or are you saying to wait it out until that time comes

and then negotiate ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...