Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK but it's always best to scan up these letters you mention so We can decide proper actions/responce/use please scan them all to one mass pdf in date order.  Read upload use the online sites listed Dx
    • Instead of ridiculing them you could point out the embarrassment they will have in the papers if they persist in being in Court with a little old lady. it also won't look good for their landowners since negative comments afffect them too.
    • I'm going to say they haven't complied with the PAP although they did write saying they would be issuing a court claim in their letter they also state I had an agreement with OVO which they have a copy of the agreement and its terms and condition which I have definitely not seen. Also I've technically never had an agreement with OVO but with SSE I didn't even realise they had sold to them until this letter!
    • I have had a pre "warning" from TM Legal regarding 2 old debts stating they are going to send a claim form in email. I was sent a PAP form which i responded to on both but like a melt i sent their PAP pack back to them in my request for CCA etc using the CAG response form. I have not to my knowledge received a response for either. my question is, will sending their pack back cause me issues in the future? can I request they send this back to me?
    • Your consumer rights within six months If a product develops a fault within the first six months after purchase, it’s assumed it has been there since the time of purchase. This means it’s up to the retailer to prove it wasn’t there when you bought it. If a repair or replacement has failed, you have the right to reject the goods for a full refund or price reduction. Your consumer rights after six months If a fault develops after six months, it’s up to you to prove it was faulty at the time of purchase or delivery.   .
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

P45 instead of P60?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've worked for the same company for 33 years, kind of. 33 years continuation of service. Basically regional electricity company which has gone through many changes and ownership over the years with our contracting division being renamed and rebounded over the years.

 

Recently, we have been informed of big changes involving new investors and a change of payroll office. We have been told our terms of employment will be remaining the same but as we are moving to a different payroll office or system, instead of getting a P60, we will instead be receiving a P45! Alarm bells ringing, is this normal/allowed/legal??

Have a meeting coming up to discuss exactly what's happening to us as a company and I want to be able to quote correct law regarding this matter.

Any help or advice appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The two forms have entirely different purposes. The official explanantions from HMRC webpage explain it better than I coulld

 

P45 ===> https://www.gov.uk/paye-forms-p45-p60-p11d

 

P60 ===> https://www.gov.uk/paye-forms-p45-p60-p11d/p60

 

So you only get a P45 from your employer when you stop working for them. Which doesn't sound right in your situation. You need to get proper explanations from them, not only about why a P45 but, more importantly, are they making changes to your contract of employment because of the new investors? That could have all sorts of implications for you, continuity of service for example.

Edited by Ethel Street
Link to post
Share on other sites

We have had some clarification and they are saying because we are going to a different PAYE reference, that is the reason why they can't give us a P60. All of our terms and service stay exactly the same. Still sounds strange.

I'll check out the links, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

This page on HMRC PAYE guidance to employers seems to cover what you've explained and says it isn't necessary for the employer to issue a P45.

 

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/payroll-what-to-do-if-your-business-merges-or-changes-ownership

 

 

 

 

I'm not an expert on this I'm afraid. It might be worth calling HMRC helpline for advice. 

 

 https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-revenue-customs/contact/income-tax-enquiries-for-individuals-pensioners-and-employees

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ethel Street said:

This page on HMRC PAYE guidance to employers seems to cover what you've explained and says it isn't necessary for the employer to issue a P45.

 

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/payroll-what-to-do-if-your-business-merges-or-changes-ownership

 

 

 

 

I'm not an expert on this I'm afraid. It might be worth calling HMRC helpline for advice. 

 

 https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-revenue-customs/contact/income-tax-enquiries-for-individuals-pensioners-and-employees

Thank for the link, been trying to chat to someone online but each time I eventually get to put in my name, I'm told they are all busy again, lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

So still no further forward. Meeting today basically said contracts being signed tomorrow and full details will be released. Still not sure if this is investment or new ownership, guessing the latter. Will try calling HMRC again today. Was on hold for my lunch break yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...