Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Claim Form - old Vanquis Card debt - poss SB'd


bissell
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1126 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have read through some posts for help but feel a bit overwhelmed with what steps I should be taking, and making sure I get them correct.

 

I had a vanquis card in 2012/2013. No payments/correspondence from myself since prior to 2015 (not showing on credit report, and I'm certain these are correct), possibly earlier. Defaulted in 2018 (according to credit report).

 

I would be grateful of any and all help, advice. 

 

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell

 

Date of issue – 19th March 2021

 

Date to submit defence  - 20th April 2021

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

1.Sum of £1016.54 due by defendant under agreement regulated by CCA 1974 for a Vanquis account ref XXX.

 

2.failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s.87(1) of the CCA 1974 which has not been compiled with.

 

3.The debt legally assigned to claimaint 23-09-19, notice of which given to defendant.

 

4.Claim includes statutory interest under  s.69 of county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £81.32. The claimant claims the sum of £1097.86

 

What is the total value of the claim? 1247.86
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Possibly?
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? NA

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?
Credit Card
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after April 2007, it was October 2012

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online, I think. May have been sent papers to sign and send back. 
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purcahser
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I dont recall, but it is showing on my credit report
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? yes
 

Why did you cease payments? Single mom, on benefits trying to go self employed
 

What was the date of your last payment? Earlier than 2015, possibly 2013. I do not have evidence, and can not even remember that long ago.
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell Claim Form - old vanquis card debt

Sounds like its statute barred

 

go ring vanquis and ask last payment date please

 

dont be conned into even phoning lowell

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum bissell and thank you for completing the questionnaire. 

 

If you could clarify ...you have not acknowledged the claim or made payment since 2015 ...which month ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Lowell / Vanquis Claim Form recieved.

I will phone them asap for that info.

 

On 23/03/2021 at 14:32, Andyorch said:

Welcome to the forum bissell and thank you for completing the questionnaire. 

 

If you could clarify ...you have not acknowledged the claim or made payment since 2015 ...which month ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

No, I simply ignored as I had other debts to worry about. I can not recall the last payment I made as it was so long ago, but on my credit file it only shows years as far back as January 2015 and there is no data for payments showing. Not even late payment data.  I only had the card for 0ne, possibly two years. 

 

i just realised I made an error on the questionnaire. The credit card was after April 2007, it was October 2012.  I am currently trying to get through to Vanquis.

 

I managed to get through and was told a payment was made on the 28th August 2017 for £20. And they do not have records of any payments before that and told me it was handed to Lowell. I did not make the 2017 payment. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems weird

 

 

did they indicate where that payment came from?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He told me as the account was passed to lowell in 2019, he could not access any more information for me. He then started to state he could not get any payment info that was older than one year. I asked how did he get the 2017 info as that was older than one year.

 

He was trying to get through to another department for me but kept me on hold, I asked if any statements of the account could be posted, he said he needed to speak to the other department, I asked for details to be posted if he could source them and hung up as I felt he would not or could not give me any more information. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no harm in sending vanquis an sar.

 

also might not harm to ring again and say how helpful the last person was but you forgot to ask if there were any other previous payment to this mystery one in 2017? cant hurt you too, you might get a better operator.

 

to me it looks like its def SB's as you say your credit file shows nowt back to 2015

 

with regard to the claimform..for the minute it just do the following:

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.
..
get a CCA Request running to the claimant

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/

..

Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

on BOTH type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell Claim Form - old Vanquis Card debt - poss SB'd

seems ok.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you DX, I am already feeling less overwhelmed.

I did attempt to log into the MCOL without success. I used the claim number and the password provided on the claim form, but it keeps being rejected. I will try again tomorrow first thing, in the meantime I will prepare the letters.

And I will get back in touch with Vanquis until I receive more information. 

Thank you once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you'll find you need to register on the gov't gateway site 1st then login there before you can use the details from the claimform

read the guide carefully

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, I did not receive any paper work back from Lowells, but I did receive a confirmation letter from their solicitors on their behalf asking me to communicate with them only, and not Lowells. They also offered payment plans and options to avoid any further court action. 

I did not respond to this letter in any form.

 

Tomorrow is Day 33, and I was wondering if I should put in my defence this evening, or should I wait until tomorrow, in case anything arrives in the post in the morning? I am worried in case I am counting the 33 days wrong, and it is today and not tomorrow. (claim was submitted 19th March).

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you do AOS ?

and is the SAR back from Vanquis yet? should be ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tues 20th by 4.00pm is your deadline for a defence.....have you got a rough draft of the defence you intend to submit ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I did the AOS the same day or following day from my post. 

I didn't hear back from Vanquis. 

 

I do not have a rough draft, I was just logging back into this forum and MCOL to look over things. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have already been reading up 

lots of like threads here 

use our search top right in the red banner

 

lowell vanquis claimform.

 

post up your defence and we'll tidy it.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I thought I had read what I needed, and just needed to submit the final part to dispute it. I now know different.

 

For my defence all I can think to say  ( I don't understand all these laws/terminology) is ; 

 

I vaguely recall having dealings with Vanquis some 8 years ago, and cannot recall the specific details of accounts or agreements which the claimant refers to - I sought further details via a CPR13;14 and CCA request. Whilst I received a letter of acknowledgement no further details were forward to myself. Without such evidence I deny any breach of agreement and/or any money owed to the claimant.

A SAR has been sent to Vanquis for further clarity on any old debt I may have with them.

 

Thank you again for your time. I have made sure I have all evening/morning to go over everything I need to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't need legalise at all.

 

100's of suitable no paperwork/holding defence example here already 

use our std format 

 

why didn't you chase the SAR to vanquis? they only had 30days?

you ideally need to findout where this phantom payment came from, cause if its not by you or fake/mistake on their system, you could nail the case shut by filing our SB defence.

 

but you've had a month to do all this and wasted it...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I did not make the payment. Can I not file a statute barred defence regardless? The vanquis account was opened at the end of 2012 and  I only had the account for about 1 year. I have searched my files at home and could only find a few original statements from when I first opened the account.  I know what was going on in my life in August 2017, and it wasn't making a one off payment to Vanquis after years of not paying them.

 

I have used the claim form links but they take me to the original posts talking through CPR and CCA, which I have already done. I have read through various posts with defences, but I do not understand them enough to relate to them. Is the standard format using bullet points 1, 2, 3 etc? 

 

I get the feeling I am not going to get anywhere with my current defence. I will read more and try to understand it better.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well don't panic about filing just yet i know it's due tomorrow, but as a Litigant In Person (LiP) you are given certain leeway.

 

what were your funding sources for that period, i'e what bank accounts did you hold?

as it's within 6yrs you could quite easily using that banks phone banking or online system look at the statement for that period or go phone the bank and ask

 

as i said it would be 1000% better to file SB , but ofcourse must be 1000% sure as well.

 

eitherway we can deal easily.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been through my bank account for 2017, and a random payment to Vanquis does appear. It makes no sense to be there though, there are no payments for years before that one, and it does not show up on my credit file as a payment. Although the default appears on the credit file in January 2018 which ties in with the last payment.

 

So this means it cannot be statute barred. So annoyed.

 

I can only assume the stress I was under at that time made me feel like trying to clean up my debts.

 

I am re writing the defence, in (hopefully)  a better format.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good job we know our tricks, that could of been a fatal mistake.

 

try these for an adaptable defence

 

Programmable Search Engine (google.com)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope this is a good improvement. I found one which sounded very similar to mine, and reworded a few sections.

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.Sum of £1016.54 due by defendant under agreement regulated by CCA 1974 for a Vanquis account ref XXX.

 

2.failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s.87(1) of the CCA 1974 which has not been compiled with.

 

3.The debt legally assigned to claimant 23-09-19, notice of which given to defendant.

 

4.Claim includes statutory interest under  s.69 of county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £81.32. The claimant claims the sum of £1097.86

 

Defence

 

The defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and generic in nature. The defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on the CPRr16.5(3) in relation to any allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with Vanquis. I do not recall the precise details of the agreement and have sought clarity from the claimant.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is noted, although I do not recall ever receiving a default notice, or notice of arrears, pursuant to section 87(1) CCA 1974.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is noted, again, I do not recall ever receiving this notice pursuant to section 136 of the law of property Act 1925.

 

4. On receipt of the claim form the defendant sent for on 26/03/2021 via royal mail a request pursuant to the CCA 1974. As a copy of the agreement. The claimant failed to respond or disclose any documents to date.

 

5. On receipt of the claim form, the defendant sent a CPR13'14 request on 26/03/2021 via royal mail. An acknowledgment was received, but no documents were disclosed.

 

6. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the defendant owing any monies to the claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof to; 

 

a) Show the defendant has entered an agreement, and

b) Show how the defendant has reached the amount claimed for, and

c) Show or evidence service of a default notice/notice of sums of arrears

d) Show how the claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue claim

 

By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the claimant is entitled to the relief claimed of any relief.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks ok let @Andyorchcheck it over

well done..

 

did you manage to see if Lowell solicitors did send you a letter of claim and an I+E reply pack about 1mth before the claimform via northants bulk court?

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I don't have the letter any more, I do recall Lowell sending a letter with something about income and earnings.

I didn't read it properly, I just thought it was another offer of reducing the debt. I always believed debt collectors couldn't/wouldn't enforce debts through courts. Hence my lack of a serious attitude about it, and not keeping anything.

 

If I know they sent such a letter, is that relevant to 3? Might my defence 3 need changing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...