Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Odd one this, I recieved 2 notice's for the 18th and 19th April stating that I overstayed on Wigan Robin Retail Park. Permitted Minutes 180. They state I was there 355 minutes on the 18th and 388 minutes on the 19th. Both times I was there around 10 minutes getting my wife a brew from costa after dropping the kids off at school.  On both days I had passed through there a second time around 3pm, again to get a brew then left. Both notices have 2 images each, Entrance and exit.  This is the interesting bit. The Entrance images both timestamped actually clearly show I am exiting the retail park not entering it. And the exiting images they provided show me leaving the carpark after visiting a second time later in the day. In the attachments You'll see all 4 images show that I am exiting, none of them are of me entering. I understand most if not all that see this post won't know the area but if the look at the map link i gave you'll see the road I was on leading up to the main road. g24 ltd 1.pdfg24 ltd 1.pdf GoogleMap view of the road I am on in the entrance images I would have had dashcam footage but I since formatted the memory card. I tried recovery tools but I couldn't get the files back.  
    • An update: I just got another PCN. I get the feeling that someone in the residence is calling OPS, as it's dated for a few mins after I parked. I won't appeal of course. Interestingly, our cleaner was also parked but didn't get a PCN. I asked them why and apparently they're whitelisted. I did ask the MA if they could whitelist me and they said they couldn't. Clearly they decided not to tell the truth. Surely, this would resolve all of the issues entirely i.e. we'd keep non-residents from parking, whilst allowing for residents to park without issue? Also, could OPS now take me to court for both PCNs separately, or could it be one case?    
    • I was with sse broadband until Jun 2023 at which point without notifying me they passed me to origin broadband who I was unaware is my supplier now -  My broadband at home kept working and I was under the impression that sse are taking direct debit payments from my bank account and everything is fine because the Internet has continued to work.  To my horror I have just noticed that origin broadband has been sending me PDF bills for £39 a month and the email heading has been showing as just no reply so I thought it was junk and never bother to check it.  I have now noticed a bill every month and now I owe them some £350. I did instruct origin to supply me Internet and therfore don't feel responsible for this debt.  What are my rights and is it a legal debt considered I did not sign any agreements with them - their first contact with me tho was very clever back in July 2023 trying to lure me into an agreement however because I just saw that email now I'm not sure what to do because I owe them 400 pounds nearly supposedly at 39 per month.  Our agreement with sse was for 26 per month but they shut shop and passed us to origin without asking our consent.    The following is what origin email said back in July before they stated sending invoice every month for payment.    We hope you're enjoying your reliable phone and broadband with us. We're just letting you know your phone and broadband package will end on 30 Jun 2023. Thankfully, good things don't need to come to an end - read on to decide what you want to do next.   Below you'll find the details of your current package and some other great options to compare it to.   What can I do - shall I just pay the debt and cancel it and move elsewhere or is there any way I can fight this as they are more or less enforced upon us with out permission by sse who most Likly sold our accounts to them.    Any help greatly appreciated 
    • whyisthis - Oh bless ya, it's so easily done.  Not worth losing sleep over; listen to the guys here, they know their stuff.  They won't take you to court, they'd get laughed out of it x
    • Monk - you are an experienced and respected member of this forum. Surely you realise how vitally important it is to respect court deadlines. There was no lack of knowledge.  You knew the deadline date.  You calculated it yourself in post 5.  It was written on the claimform.  Defence deadlines are written on probably a thousand threads on the forum. Sorry, but if you're up for a legal fight you also have to be up for organising yourself properly. As for now - 1.  pay it within 30 days and the CCJ disappears, or 2.  don't pay, nothing "legal" will happen, but you'll have a CCJ for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer claimform - old 2003 Lloyds Loan -stayed - Now n244 to lift stay-Summary Judgment


sxam
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 434 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot

 

Date of issue –  29 January 2021

  

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

1.By an agreement between Lloyds Banking Group & the Defendant on or around 13/05/2003 (‘the Agreement’) Lloyds Banking Group agreed to loan the Defendant monies.

 

2.The Defendant did not  pay the instalments as they fell due. 

 

3.The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice.

 

4.The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant. The Claimant therefore claims £8704.42 and costs.

  

What is the total value of the claim? £9214.42
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes however I failed to send the PAP back. I only sent a letter saying the account is in dispute for failing to fulfil CCA request. PAP they send was for £3200, however their claim is almost three times that.
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? yes

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Loan, however I cannot find the amount on any of the communication.
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Yes
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In Branch
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser (Cabot, through Mortimer Clarke)
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Unsure
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
 

Why did you cease payments? They failed to supply CCA 

 

What was the date of your last payment? August 2017
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Give answer here
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes, I was on debt management plan until September 2017. I stopped all payment from the time they failed to comply with my CCA request.

 

...............................................

 

 

Hi all,

 

I have been silently following this forum for sometime as I was in lot of debt in and around 2003 and I was with Euro Debt paying token payments

 

. With lot of information from this site, I started sending CCA request to my creditors in September 2017. I was in debt management plant until then. I stopped all token payment from September 2017, since all of them failed to comply with my request.

 

 I have been getting letters and threat-o-gram from different DCA, that didn't bother me much.

 

Now I received claim form for one of my debt.

I do not acknowledge this debt which is in the region of £8700

 

. I did receive PAP from their solicitor on 16th December but the amount on the PAP was for £3200.

 

I failed to reply to the PAP (apologies for my ignorance) as I didn't think it was necessary as they never sent me the agreement. I simply wrote a letter to them saying account is in dispute for failing to supply agreement.

 

My answers for the questions below.

Please suggest how I should take this forward.

Appreciate your help.

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.
..
get a CCA Request running to the claimant

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/

..

Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

on BOTH type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx,

Do I again send CCA request even though I sent it back in September 2017? Cabot replied saying they don't have it and they need to request it from Lloyds, but I have never heard back since then. 

 

Problem I have is, I only had one loan with Lloyds and Apex is dealing with this debt.

Cabot took over Lloyds credit card debt in the region of £2900.

They sent PAP for £3200 but now claim is for £8700.

The sums do not add up.

 

I will acknowledge the claim and send them CPR letter.

 

Once again, appreciate your help. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and a CCA.

 

apex are a powerless dca why are you blindly paying them anything!!

a dca is not a bailiff!!

 

start a new topic on it .

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

I haven't paid any penny to any DCA since 2017. Apex gone quiet since they could not produce an agreement. Reason I mentioned Apex on this thread is because they are the only DCA dealing with Lloyds Loan. So this claim from Cabot does not make any sense, the amount is wrong, debt type is wrong etc

 

I will pop in CCA along with CPR. I have already done the AOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the debt might have been sold since then

Apex dont buy debts

they only operate from their stated client as ambulance chasers.

 

have you moved in recent times and not informed people?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

apex don't buy debt

they only chase for their stated clients...said that in above post

 

so who was their client?

probably not still the original creditor as it was from 2003 and i bet sold by lloyds around the time of the default in ??

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like Apex gave the account back to Lloyds after my CCA request. Lloyds then passed it on to Cabot but I never received a letter of assignment nor have I received PAP for this amount.

 

Now my question is, I did AOS yesterday, does 14 days starts from tomorrow to file the defence or I still get 33 days from the date on the claim form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

as in post 2......

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.
..
get a CCA Request running to the claimant

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/

..

Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

on BOTH type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............

^^

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thank you DX, not far away from filing the defence. This is what I have prepared for now. Can you please caste your eye over to see if this is all good to file?

Cheers.

 

 

Particular Of claim

 

1. By an agreement between Lloyds Banking Group & the defendant on or around 13/05/2003 (“the agreement”) Lloyds Banking Group agreed to loan the defendant monies.

 

2. The defendant did not pay the instalments as they fell due. The agreement was terminated following service of a default notice.

 

3. The agreement was assigned to the claimant.

 

4. THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS:

1) £8704.42

2) COSTS

 

Defence

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claims are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) - Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

1.I have in the past had financial dealings with Lloyds Banking Group. I do not recall the precise details of the agreement and have sought clarity from the claimant.

 

2.However, I do not recall ever receiving a Default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974.

 

3. However I do not recall ever receiving this notice pursuant to sec136 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

4. However, I do not recall ever receiving letter of assignment from the Lloyds Banking group advising the debt was assigned to the claimant.

 

5. On receipt of this claim I sent CPR 31.14 and section 78 request. The claimant failed to provide a valid copy of the agreement and therefore remains in default of said request.

 

6. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:-

 

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement ; and

b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

c) Show or evidence service of a Default Notice/Notice of Sums in Arrears,

d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 06/02/2021 at 14:33, sxam said:

I did receive PAP from their solicitor on 16th December but the amount on the PAP was for £3200.

 

I failed to reply to the PAP (apologies for my ignorance) as I didn't think it was necessary as they never sent me the agreement. I simply wrote a letter to

 

You also need to remove the repeated use of however.

 

Ive added para no's to their poc above too to make it easier

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you DX,

 

PAP received was was for completely different amount with different reference, should I say i received PAP or can i decline receiving it? There was nothing to suggest the PAP was for this debt.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

really... so no link with any same ref number nor creditor etc etc.

do you still have it?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to go DX? Shall I mention current account PAP or file the defence as above saying no PAP received. 

 

Last day of defence is 3rd of March, Should I leave it till the end and file it or do it now? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request for loans are section 77 not section 78.....and you will have to mention that they served an invalid PAP with no connection to the their court claim.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

take your time sxam, not due till 4pm the 2nd.

better to get it nice and tight and correct 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thank you Andy/Dx

 

UPDATED Defence, 3 days remaining.

 

Not sure where to mention invalid PAP. I put it under number 5. Please check if this is good to go.

 

Defence
 
The Defendant contends that the particulars of claims are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any allegation to which a specific response has not been made.
 
The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) – failed to serve a letter of claim pre-claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.
 
1. I have in the past had financial dealings with Lloyds Banking Group. I do not recall the precise details of the agreement and have sought clarity from the claimant.
 
2. However, I do not recall ever receiving a Default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974.
 
3. I do not recall ever receiving this notice pursuant to sec136 of the Law of Property Act 1925.
 
4. I do not recall ever receiving a letter of assignment from the Lloyds Banking group advising the debt was assigned to the claimant.
 
5. Claimant served the invalid PAP with no connection to their court claim,
 
6. On receipt of this claim I sent CPR 31.14 and section 77 request. The claimant failed to provide a valid copy of the agreement and therefore remains in default of said request.
 
7. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:-
 
a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and
b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and
c) Show or evidence service of a Default Notice/Notice of Sums in Arrears,
d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;
 
By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
........................
 
I was going through the defence briefly and saw option for counterclaim. Do I counterclaim? What do i need to pay attention to while filing a defence?

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not due till tuesday by 4pm.

await its checking 1st please as i see thats not 100% right 

 

but not you do not counterclaim.

simply copy and past the text from here into the box after hitting enter defence.

 

slowdown... no rush

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particular Of claim

 

1. By an agreement between Lloyds Banking Group & the defendant on or around 13/05/2003 (“the agreement”) Lloyds Banking Group agreed to loan the defendant monies.

 

2. The defendant did not pay the instalments as they fell due. The agreement was terminated following service of a default notice.

 

3. The agreement was assigned to the claimant.

 

4. THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS:

1) £8704.42

2) COSTS

 

 

Defence

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claims are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any allegation to which a specific response has not been made.
 
1.The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) – failed to serve a letter of claim pre-claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is admitted that the claimant has sent details of a current account with an unknown account number but has no connection to this this claim or alleged debt. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.
 
2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with Lloyds Banking Group. I do not recall the details of alleged debt the claimant refers to nor have they referred to any account number within its particulars. I have therefore sought clarity from the claimant and requested further in formation which at this time they failed to comply to my request.
 
3. Paragraph 2 is noted. However, as above the alleged debt is still unknown and further I do not recall ever receiving a Default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974.
 
4.Paragraph 3 is noted. As above as the debt is unknown its immaterial and I do not recall ever receiving this notice pursuant to sec136 of the Law of Property Act 1925.
 
5. On receipt of this claim I sent CPR 31.14 and section 77 request. The claimant has failed to comply with either requests and in particular my section 77 request and provide a valid copy of the agreement and therefore remains in default of my request and is prevented from enforcing the agreement they wish to rely on.
 
7. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:-
 
a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and
b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and
c) Show or evidence service of a Default Notice/Notice of Sums in Arrears,
d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;
 
By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
 
 
 
.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read of concluded topics in our Legal Success Forum...then you will be familiar with the process and what comes next.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/129-legal-successes/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...