Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
    • Received a final demand today Final demand.pdf
    • Here is my final draft: I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act.   1.        The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date.   2.        I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment.   As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   3.        The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’.  The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents.   4.        Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018.   5.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020.   6.        Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicotors is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’   7.        I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’.   8.        The claimant relies upon and exhibits a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement.   It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HH Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’.   The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause.   9.        Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not try to mislead the court.   10.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024
    • Only trying to help.  Ain't being nasty.  Some
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mint CC from 2009 Cabot chasing with fabricated paperwork.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

 

I previously had a credit card with Mint approx 2008 Oct.

I came in to some financial difficulties at the time and set up a payment plan.

I then tried an unenforceable credit agreement this is all 11 years ago.

 

I stopped making payments 5 years and 10 months from when Cabot called me.

So it will be 6 years in October. 

 

I requested to see the original agreement, what they have provided is a generic copy of terms etc and an electronically ticked box.

Well I DID NOT have a computer then and phones weren't what they are today.

I DID originally sign paperwork and post it back as was normal then.

This new paperwork is totally fabricated. 

 

Where do I stand with this?

I don't want to end up with a ccj,

I am concerned as I am currently not working again! 

 

Any help much appreciated. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never Answer the phone to any DCA, all communication should be in writing

 

Is this showing on your credit file still?

 

If so what is the default date?

 

Although it's sounds very much like you should just sit tight and not say or do anything involving this as it will be Statute barred in a couple of months. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

defaulted date was years ago going by an old thread here

 

i'd say the debt is almost Statute barred then

hold you nerve

 

can you put that cca return up as one multipage pdf please too

read upload carefully.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, London1971 said:

Never Answer the phone to any DCA, all communication should be in writing

 

Is this showing on your credit file still?

 

If so what is the default date?

 

Although it's sounds very much like you should just sit tight and not say or do anything involving this as it will be Statute barred in a couple of months. 

 

I am a big fan of going dark and letting them do all the work and it has paid off for me almost every time so I agree with London1971 about sitting tight.

 

With that in mind it is useful to know exactly where you stand.  My understanding of the situation is that if you are in England and Wales then the account will become statute barred six years from when you last acknowledged the debt (five years in Scotland) so assuming you did not enter into any  correspondence during which you said anything like "I owe this money" then the last acknowledgement would be the date of your last payment.

 

May I suggest you research your bank statements and properly establish the last date you paid and that will give you an exact date to work towards, basically 49-80 days from today (12th August) assuming it goes SB on a date in October.

 

It is quite possible that Cabot will expire this time in useless threatomatics by sending further correspondence or possibly flicking it out to another low life DCA.

 

So I think best to find the actual date then open all further correspondence to make sure it is not a letter before action (in which case come back here) and file it till the SB date.

 

After that you can have some fun with them especially if the documents they provided are indeed bogus.  Might be worth doing a SAR to Mint (now owned by royal Bank of Scotland) to see what they send back.  If you get lucky and they send details of your original application form then Cabot's bollocks will be very nicely on the table.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 My understanding of the situation is that if you are in England and Wales then the account will become statute barred six years from when you last acknowledged the debt (five years in Scotland) so assuming you did not enter into any  correspondence during which you said anything like "I owe this money" then the last acknowledgement would be the date of your last payment.

 

Apparently not so now since a Judge decided to rewrite the Limitations Act and the goal posts were moved in favor of creditors...its from the date the creditor decided to issue a default notice and the 14 days had expired to rectify the breach.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The above is true but is the debt still showing on  your credit file?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, 

 

Thank you for the replies. 

 

I won't be answering the phone again. 

 

I have looked on my credit file and can't see anything. I have been using clearscore and I'm not sure it's very comprehensive. 

 

Which checker is best to use and will give me the fullest picture of my previous credit file history?

 

Also I did check back in my accounts and I can't remember exact date now but will check again but I believe it was October nearly 6 years ago that I had last paid. 

 

They did also send me all the statements but like I say I'm sure this sheet is with the check box is not true. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try Credit Karma,

 

However, I'm getting the idea from your timeline that it's disappeared on the 6th anniversary of it's default. Please confirm with Credit Karma or Experian.

 

This would mean that 6 years after the last payment is when it becomes statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Andyorch said:

 

Apparently not so now since a Judge decided to rewrite the Limitations Act and the goal posts were moved in favor of creditors...its from the date the creditor decided to issue a default notice and the 14 days had expired to rectify the breach.

 

I wonder if it is slightly more nuanced than that.

 

If an account was previously in good order but then the creditor stops paying then indeed it is some months before the DN is issued and the creditor then has 14 days to put the account right before it becomes defaulted and indeed the SB clock starts then.

 

However, what if the DN was previously issued (which seems likely since Westcot have this now) and it was subsequently paid for a while before the payments stopped.  If the DN has been issued and payments of any sort stop at some point after this then I would think the SB clock starts with the date of the last payment.

 

Probably in this case it is a good idea to SAR Mint so the OP can get a proper picture of his situation E.G. what was the nature of his sign up, when did he default (I.E. their records of the DN date) , who it was then sold on to and when that party was last paid.  The best/next thing to do here is establish the SB date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there is no exact science and not one answer fits all scenarios ......but the credit file marker will tally with the date of the DN...because it cant be registered until such DN has been served....if the arrears were not paid.

 

If a DN is issued and the arrears are rectified before the statuary 14 days ...then the Default never happened nor should it ever be recorded on the CRAs

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so I have checked my bank statements and the last payment to Mint was 03 Oct 14.

 

I haven't paid since and haven't acknowledged the debt again in any way. 

 

When they called I said I'd need to see proof that the debt existed as I have no knowledge of it. 

 

I have checked credit Karma and Clearscore and it just shows 2 credit cards I have settled one with idem and one with capital one. 

 

I sold my house in December 14 and thought I'd paid everything off. I am surprised that there is still anything outstanding especially as when I went to buy another house in 2015 one popped up which I paid in full and settled. ( I just don't know who that was with but I paid Northampton County Court

 

I genuinely thought I had paid all the past debts off and I have a good credit score and have been given plenty of credit since which I have managed responsibility. 

 

I am confused as to how this hasn't been paid as all the others have and I've even managed to get a mortgage since. 

 

Could I have paid via another debt collection agency and now they ard trying their luck somehow?

 

Is there a way to check all the debts I have had and their status'? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

last payment to Mint was 03 Oct 14.

 

 

Then it cant become statute barred until at least Nov/Dec 2020...subject to what date the DN was issued.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And a default, not showing anymore would have zero effect on either your credit score or your mortgage eligibility. Even if a default is showing and more than 3 years old it won't stop you getting a mortgage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just paid £14.99 and I can not see this anywhere. 

 

There is something showing for Cabot which again I believe I have paid but I'm not sure which lender that was related to. 

 

My credit score is now 961 out of 999. I really don't want ruin it. 

 

I am renting now and my chances of getting somewhere to live will be affected if I had to leave this property. 

 

If I SAR Mint or is it RBS now? Could they not just add the ticked sheet also? 

What exactly do I need to ask for? 

Screenshot_20200812_164025_com.android.chrome.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, London1971 said:

And a default, not showing anymore would have zero effect on either your credit score or your mortgage eligibility. Even if a default is showing and more than 3 years old it won't stop you getting a mortgage.

Do I just try to say I haven't received there correspondence and ask them to send it recorded delivery and hang it out until 2021?

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, London1971 said:

And a default, not showing anymore would have zero effect on either your credit score or your mortgage eligibility. Even if a default is showing and more than 3 years old it won't stop you getting a mortgage.

Is it possible to see my defaults from over 5 years ago anywhere. Not showing on my credit file. I downloaded the whole thing from experian. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Click on the SAR link. They will send you everything, that they have on you, screen shot's , emails, etc.  You will be looking for, and will easily find the date that a default notice was sent out, and sold to Cabot. If the default date is before your last payment date then it will be statute barred in 3 months.

 

Providing the DCA has your current address I really don't think you have anything to worry about. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear you say your last payment to Mint was 3rd October 2014.

 

if that is the case there are possibilities:

 

a). Your last payment was a normal payment as a result of receiving the normal monthly bill and paying some part of it.   If you did not then pay anything else then you would have received some debt collection letters from mint over a period of some months presumably culminating in a Default Notice probably somewhere between month three and month six.   If, following receipt of that notice you did nothing then fourteen days after the date of that notice the statutory bar clock started which means that it probably started somewhere around January to April (but check this by getting SAR sent to Mint).  In this scenario you could have perhaps eight months to go before the stat bar kicks in.

 

b).  You had not paid the account properly prior to 3rd October 2014 and a DN was issued.  You responded by paying and the DN became voided as you corrected the issue by paying the arrears in which case we are back to a)

 

c).  You had not paid the account properly prior to 3rd October 2014 and a DN was issued.  You did not correct the situation within 14 days of the DN being issued and as such it came into being.  However, you continued to make some payments but if you did not fully pay the arrears the DN stays in place in which case your Stat Bar clock starts the last time you made a payment and this account will therefore become SBed 3rd October 2020.

 

Hope my logic is sound but I welcome any other CAGers chipping in here.

 

To be clear, did you pay Mint until you stopped paying or did you start to pay a debt collector after the account was passed to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would suggest going by your old thread....

that RBS must have defaulted this well before the sale to cabot, and cabot can't do anything anyway if RBS did not ever default it.

which i believe they did long long ago....

 

pers i'd simply ignore cabot until or unless you get a letter of claim.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, London1971 said:

Click on the SAR link. They will send you everything, that they have on you, screen shot's , emails, etc.  You will be looking for, and will easily find the date that a default notice was sent out, and sold to Cabot. If the default date is before your last payment date then it will be statute barred in 3 months.

 

Providing the DCA has your current address I really don't think you have anything to worry about. 

They have written to me and I did confirm where they should send the copy of the original credit agreement. 

 

17 hours ago, dx100uk said:

pers i'd simply ignore cabot until or unless you get a letter of claim.

I have all the mint statements. Would it show when they defaulted it on one of those? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

i would suggest going by your old thread....

that RBS must have defaulted this well before the sale to cabot, and cabot can't do anything anyway if RBS did not ever default it.

which i believe they did long long ago....

 

pers i'd simply ignore cabot until or unless you get a letter of claim.

 

dx

 

 

 

I’m going to concur with this. The very fact it’s not showing on any CRA anymore , says to me that it’s 6 years plus since default. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, comebackjimmy said:

You had not paid the account properly prior to 3rd October 2014 and a DN was issued.  You did not correct the situation within 14 days of the DN being issued and as such it came into being.  However, you continued to make some payments but if you did not fully pay the arrears the DN stays in place in which case your Stat Bar clock starts the last time you made a payment and this account will therefore become SBed 3rd October 2020.

I paid £20 which in no way could have brought the account up to date. Looks more like a token gesture. I am going to look at all the statements when I can later and see if a default had been already issued which I think it had. I think there would have been a default charge applied to the account maybe £12 or so. 

 

The logic makes total sense. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont be in the statements

will most probably be in the comms/account log .....in code too.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, danscott666 said:

I paid £20 which in no way could have brought the account up to date. Looks more like a token gesture. I am going to look at all the statements when I can later and see if a default had been already issued which I think it had. I think there would have been a default charge applied to the account maybe £12 or so. 

 

The logic makes total sense. 

 

When did you pay the £20? was it before the default letter or after?  Exact date and to whom the £20 was paid is key to calculating the SB date.  It could be construed that paying £20 or any figure was an acknowledgement of the debt and could re-start the SB clock.

 

Important to understand the date but I concur with the other CAGers that it is probably not something to worry about.

 

As an aside I fought (and won) an argument with Lowells over the default date.  They were trying to assert that the Default date was later than it was but I was able to disabuse them of that idea thanks to having the original Default Letter plus also getting it confirmed by the original lender (Vanquis).  They sent me the exact same copy of the Default Notice as part of their SAR response so I say again a good idea to SAR Mint so you know where you are and you are then ready to rebuff any bullshit from the DCA.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...