Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Forgot to add, got friends in Italy, and one of them rang the Police where the fine came from, and her reply was “Tell your friend it’s not a big deal, it’s only a speeding fine we’re not going to chase him, tell him in future to take his foot off the gas, however it he returns to a Italy and gets control checked, he would be held until the fine is paid”  A bit odd I thought, considering I am being chased now.
    • I've read loads of old messages about what to do but feel my case is different, it's a bit of a back story so ill break it down. - Had a letter from an Italian province in July of 2020 for a speeding offence in 2019 for 575 euros, was in a hire car I used for work, no longer work for them and heard nothing from either. - Thought blimey, but went to pay it anyway, it had doubled to over 1100 euros, yeah I can't afford paying that, filled out the attached information sheet to say it was me driving but I have no money or job due to COVID (true story) and sent it back (durrrr) - Heard nothing until December of 2023, a letter from an appointed solicitor from Florence saying if I don't pay, we will chase you through the legal system with costs beared to you. - May of this year, I get a letter from CLI (Credit Limits International) basically saying they have been appointed to carry out the collection, £1475. - Stupidly, I started the 'three letter process' asking for proof etc, and they replied a few days ago with a copy of the fines I had received from Italy, they stated the debt has no terms and conditions as it relates to a fine in Italy and the debt is not subject to the Consumer Credit agreement. I translate that to "at the moment we don't own the debt and have been given authority from Italy to pursue the debt". That is where I am currently at, I would begrudge giving in and paying an obscene amount. As seen from similar threads, I know a threat of a visit is coming, followed by a threat of court action, but annoyingly it hasn't been mentioned how these cases were concluded and the threads are now locked. I've read to ignore them, but can't help but feel that because it's such a substantial amount that they will feel it's worthy of pursuing this no matter the hoops they have to jump through. Along with admitting it was me driving and opening the can of worms by contacting the DCA, it wouldn't look good for me should it ever get to a courtroom.  Has anyone with previous experience managed to 'get away with it'? Anyone know what they're capable of other than nagging me? I'm not after any moral judgment.
    • take the SD card out and put on a pc/laptop then run recuva on it in  select videos only option select specific location hit browse then select drive letter of the SD card. then next  then deep scan then go have a cup of tea..  when done dont recover the all files back to the card select a new folder on your pc/laptop        
    • hi all, i will list my curmcumstance first then list the details of the penalty charge - we are 2 diabled people being affected by the cost of living crisis and are skint etc. i am disabled with mobility issues(arthritis in knees and ankles and gout) and cant operate car pedals anymore so i let a friend up the road use my car in exchange for her driving me about. its a good arrangement as i get a 'chauffer' and she gets the use of car. the car is parked in her drive which is better as i was refused a disabled space (even on appeal) and too much congestion to park the car outside my house. my friend is vulnerable as she has suffered depression and suicidal thoughts since the loss of her mother a few years back, she is dyslexic, she is a carer for one of her sons that is disabled due to mental illness and mobility. she lives in a council house and cannot work. we went to iceland ..attracted by the 10items for £10 offer - we've never been there before. a large artic lorry was parked accross the car park blocking the view of one of the parking signs and blocking the disabled bays where the pay&display machine is. by the time she helped me out of the car and then went to see if it was pay&display then came back to me at the car she said she thinks it was pay even for disabled, so we looked for change in the car which we didnt have (she normally goes asda which dont need to pay for parking)so then we said we'd either go get change or go to asda...so then by the time it took her to help me back in and get out the car park took 15 minutes...5 minutes overstay past the 10minutes grace. the letter from excel parking came through and i sent it back giving her name as driver (before i saw on here that you shouldnt name the driver) then i appealed explaining what happened (lorry blocking etc) and even said we were being descriminated (advised by citizen advice)as we are disabled and 15minutes is not long enough for a crippled disabled man and a woman with dyslexia to read and understandd the sign and get out, then back in the car and look for change then get out the car park in 15minutes. i even explained she was a vulnerable person on anti-depressants and even sent a photo of medication and said if you need a doctors note then let me know....the appeal was rejected. i've emailed iceland over 50 times and they just wont tell excel to cancel this charge - they are ignorant and ive even asked them why they have a webpage saying 'iceland combatting the cost of living crisis' pretending to help their customers and they wont comment...they'd rather put more stress and anxiety on an already suicidal vulnerable person just to get money out of them..so their 'help' during this crisis is a lie as it wont even extend to disabled customers. she has now received 2 letters from DCBL saying she owes £170 for 5minutes of overstay. the last one is a final demand. as she cant read or write very well ive sent a recorded letter to DCBL (as advised by citizen advice) asking not to attend the property due to a vulnerable woman inside the property as it will only exasperate the situation, they have ignored it and basically said we dont care, you still owe. could anyone please advise - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake.   1 The date of infringement? 28th dec 2023   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] yes   If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   Has there been a response? yes   Please AS A PDF FILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first.   Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] yes   What date is on it? 15th january 2024   Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? yes   [scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'scant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] not on the front - maybe on the back but cannot find the letter now   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] yes   5 Who is the parking company? excel   6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? gravesend in iceland    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Questions for Bankworkers my non status.


elNico
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Battleaxe

Acceptable form of ID from oseas.

 

We had a military ID cards, our passports, our tax file numbers and our medibank and Southern Cross memberships.

 

I also had my Vietnams Veterans Association ID card (photo) with my service number on it.

 

I had my entry Visa into the Uk with photographs and kent had his British passport as well as his new Zealand passport, our driversl licences with our photographs and our credit cards with our thumbprints on them as well as our bankers references.

 

I think we had plenty to establish our bona fides oh I forgor also our employment contracts with photgraphic ID and thumbprints.

 

Both of us had our birth certificates and marriage certificate.

 

I also had all my post grad qualifications and registrations for the professional bodies I belonged to.

 

I think they could have taken their pick and check with the authorities after I had given my written permission for them to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also had my Vietnams Veterans Association ID card (photo) with my service number on it.

 

I can picture the scenario now.

 

"Is this acceptable ID?"

"Ooh, I don't know ..."

"You don't know, 'cause you weren't there, man!"

 

Unfortunately, the banks are lazy. They can't be bothered to check anything beyond their own files. You have to jump through a bunch of hoops just to get them to actually look at what they get from the CRAs let alone other countries.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

My question is really well the bank require two form of ID, proof or who you are which battleaxe you seemed to have plenty of and proof of address which i didn;t see from your post. What about address verification for the existing address?

On the employeee contract, did they not have an agreement with a bank that many large organisations do have, which means that effectively the company introduce you to the bank?

I came I saw I helped. I could do no more.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Intro to HSBC. Military, Australia House, New Zealand House, Immigration and Social Security all using the kent's father's address for contact purposes. the old boy had lived in the house since 1953, as did Kent until he joined the Navy.

 

Hire car documentation was in the old by's address and when we bought the car DVLA switched our licences to the old boy's address..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I work for Barclays and know for certain that they will open a basic bank account for anyone that has the right ID (basic - cash card only, no cheque book, no online banking but has D/D and S/O). I have a friend who opened that type of account the day after been declared bankrupt!!!

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you PM dave or Bankfodder or one of the Mods if you are a Bank Worker, strangel, just one of the rules of the CAG, and Welcome another Bank Worker to the site, hurrah they are arriving in droves!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

All you need to do is get a small credit card with a £200 limit, use it and pay it off in full on a regular basis. Cap 1 or barclays will maybe offer u the card but actually I didn't get mine till after my contract with a phone

Capital One SAR sent-15.03.07. Info recieved-13.04.07

Barclay Card SAR sent-15.03.07

 

WORK IN PROGRESS :cool:!!!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Strangel & welcome

 

Will your bank open an account for a person who has ios either seeking to recover or who has been successful in recovering charges from their previous bank?

 

It appears one or two banks are asking pointed questions about the reasons for changing banks..........They are also asking questions such as who is your bank & account number...............This makes me think that they are exchanging info they shouldn't............in anticipation of this governments intention to allow the banks to exchange info WITHOUT our consent

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon and what type of information do you think they are exchanging?

exactly what use do you think your bank details are to them?

 

When opening accounts its a ice breaker of agents to ask why there chaging accounts.(you know conversation im sure you have heard of it)

 

 

as for asking for bank account numbers , well there is a small thing called a direct debit transfere form, which is a form to change all your direct debits over, so yes they will ask for you details to do that with your full consent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

moll

Not necessarily so! It has come to my notice (just last week) that some banks are now refusing to open an account if the customer is reluctant to give their present account details...........I suspect they are exchanging info such as the fact that the customer is or has disputed their charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

What, you can't find a reference so you feign common knowledge instead? I'm not disputing that it happens, only that specifically post going to an old address is as major a contributory factor as you are making out. I almost suffered an incident last year, when post coming to the right address was tampered with on the premises during a visit by a letting agent and potential tenants. Pales into insignifance next to people rooting through bin-bags, or (worse) the "confdential waste" bins at the bank (where personal details are disposed of "securely" around the back).

 

Well it was certainly a massive issue to my partner and I !!!

 

We advised the bank of our moving date,at the same time gave our new address, and were told ,that all details would be updated immediatley.

They didnt.

 

We found out about 3 mts later when we were contacted by the fraud dept.

The bank had sent a business cheque book,statments etc to our old address,and the guy that had moved in was a bit of a criminal,by all accounts and knew what he was doing !

 

He had the cheque book 'scrubbed' effectively this removes all the account details, and reprinted with the details from a dissolved company, but with my partners name and address on !

 

He then went around writing large cheques which obviously bounced and the police found their way back to us !

 

I actually got to see a couple of the cheques that he had written, and they were very realistic.

 

We were also unfortunate enough to have had 3 catalogues at the time, which were seldom used,and the same pillock managed to order high value items such as playstations,tvs ,hifi etc.

I was suprised when I found out that this guys behaviour hadnt rung alarm bells with the catalogue company because he didnt just order 1 of each,he actually had the front to order 3 playstations on one order !

 

L uckily we could prove that the fraud had nothing to do with us , and the guy was quickly arrested, but I imagine it happens a lot more than me might think

 

Hope xx

You need to read this if you have ever consolidated lending through your bank,

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/49648-loans-pay-off-overdrafts.html

NatWest

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) LETTER SENT15/12/06 - STATEMENTS RCD 22/12/06

PRE-LIM AND SOC SENT 11/01/07

FULL CLAIM OF £4093.04 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INT :)

JUST WAITING FOR STANDARD BOG OFF LETTER...:rolleyes:

LETTER FROM STUART HIGLEY TODAY 20TH JAN THANKING ME FOR MY LETTER AND ADVISING ME THAT THEY ARE CONSIDERING MY CLAIM.... YEAH, BET THEY ARE !!!:lol:

LBA SENT 29/01/07

 

**** G.W.G PAYMENT OFFER RECEIVED TODAY FOR £2160. THAT WILL DO NICELY AS PART PAYMENT MR HIGLEY !!!:D ****

 

 

 

 

 

Member of the official Bill-K appreciation thread cos he's just ape !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to be the one to break this to you. but the average bank worker doesnt give a S**t if you have claimed back charges or not ,

 

after all its the amount of accounts opened thats targeted . and show me one example as to why the account wouldent be opened without prevous bank details and i am willing to bet very large sums of money theres a explaination for it ,

Link to post
Share on other sites

moll Say what you like & I ain't going to get into an argument but I can assure you it has happened..........& of course I'm going to reveal the identity & bank details of the person involved to you.....not

 

Whilst I agree about the average bank worker the bosses are a very different story. They want to deter consumers from exerting their rights & forcing us to court action ain't working.....Therefore they are thinking more in the long term.........they may reduce the number of applications in the short term but they will see it as there being more chance of them hanging on to more of their ill gotten gains........Oh! & by the way some bank workers do care as shown by their hostility to customers who contact them asking for the return of their money.........some of whom have been reduced to tears by ignorant bank staff

Link to post
Share on other sites

The standard questions bank workers ask is called using due dilligence. It is true that if an account has had a charge on the statement that the bank will refuse to open an account, which has been in place for ages prior to any claims. No banks exchange info and there are rules specific to that so rhetoric that they do without specific examples in not sufficient. If you simply fail to ask someone why they want to open an account at x bank you as a bank worker fails to understand your job. I will reiterate somthing Moll has said and that is we really do not care if you are claiming charges from another bank but if you have charges on your existing account, then we do not open the account for you. That is bank policy. I am not sure of the relevancy of this on the OP original question on NOR status but hey a good old hijack never hurt anyone, eh?:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's OK for you to be dismissive as you well know (or should) that I can't identify the person or their bank details on an open forum.......but I do know it has happened very recently.............In the absence of my refusing to disclose the details of the person involved you will just have to disagree with me........others can make their own judgement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon- there is no concrete evidence that banks ie that are not part of the same group, ie NatWest/RBS or Halifax/Bank of Scotland are sharing information re refunds or claims. Not one annonymous member here has substantiated this and there is nothing that has changed in the process of NatWest with regards to this, if there was do you think i would have not posted on it? Jon, if it turns out I am wrong I am willing to apologise to YOU but it is not correct as it stands NOW. when i am wrong come back on me and I will apologise on the forum to you and if i miss it PM me the link and I have no problem apologising to you. We both agree to disagree at the moment with the lack of a forum user to prove otherwise or information either forthcoming within the press. So, watch this space I think Jon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite so............watch this space & no I will not be revealing the details of another person by PM or any other means......What I can say without breaking a confidence is that the matter is currently being looked into.......& not by the bank in question

Link to post
Share on other sites

joncris- we have to read clearly posts, I said either ON HERE or IN THE PRESS. So when in THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. I would not expect you to break a confidence in any shape as I would never do on here if I was fully aware of the example given. Please re read what i wrote because i did say PM me the LINK not any confidence you have been given. I will of course be interested because as you know every story has two sides so I hope any cases do not fit the catagory of within a banking group of companies mentioned earlier, missed out HSBC/First Direct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...