Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help badly needed in my case against Abbey.


MattCrez
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am in the process of trying to get 600 pounds worth of charges back from Abbey. I am currently unauthorised overdrawn by 107.72 after two 5 pound direct debits cleared whilst there was no money in the account. The rest is all charges that are increasing daily. I cannot afford to pay this as it has built up to such a degree and still continues to.

 

I am just about to send out the 'final notice before action' letter to Abbey. However I am hesitant to send it because they have just contacted me insisting that I send back all my Abbey bank cards and repay the amount in full, my concern is that they state that all this information is being sent on to a credit reference agency.

 

The last thing I want is to be blacklisted for credit in the future.

 

What should I do? Shall I just find a way to pay back the amount in full then resume my case with them at a later date?

 

Please help as this is causing me endless amounts of stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would open another account today, continue to pursue abbey as they did the same with me and i'm currently awaiting a court date.

 

They asked for there cards back in the begining and nothing has been said since so i nevre sent them and my account is still open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crisp et al

 

As much as you may think the account is in dispute because an LBA has been sent does the letter actually say that?

 

If it does then thats fine, if it doesn't i would recommend that you send a separate simple letter informing them of this fact.

 

I wouldn't put anything else in the letter only that you are disputing the balance on the account and that any action taken by them in respect of closing the account, requiring the return of cards etc is counter to Para 13.6 of the banking code and will be considered as retaliatory action.

 

I would try to be brief, the banks don't seem to be too good at dealing with letters with more than a few lines in them and you want to be able to produce something which clearly informs them of your dispute should the need arise.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

 

PS ill go read through the templates for LBA and Pre lim but even if they mention it i would still write something simple for the avoidance of any doubt.

 

Edit : PPS the lba doesnt specifically confirm that the account is in dispute.

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have on going charges which are going to continue as they have with me. its a case of "computor says no" i did not send my cards in they stopped them anyway and i did not pay off any of the charges i just continued to add them to my schedual until my N1 was submitted then i attached a letter which included the fact that my charges are continuing.

 

i agree i makes sense to inform them of the current state of your account and your intentions and yes lengthy explanations do seem to confuse them .

 

i recieved a GOGW whilst my account was in unauthorised overdraft and some of the money paid off those charges, but as this happened before my N1 went in i acknowledged the payment and added the extra cost to my total. they are having some trouble getting their heads round this.

 

keep an eye on your account. GOGW dont seem to be notified of when they go in. natwest step account is pretty simple to open up, its a basic no frills account but you can upgrade after 6mnths.

 

but most of all dont be bullied by their threats. take control and take no prisoners! its your money. as for your credit score look at the templates.

 

good luck...stay cool.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for all the invaluable advice guys, it is much appreciated.

I have sent the letter as you suggested and I now feel a lot more confident in my campaign against them. It is absolutely disgusting how they treat their customers and I look forward to the satisfaction of taking back my money from them in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you should not accept it. the extra £75 is your money, its that simple

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mattcrez its your choice but i would accept the offer if they amend the credit record that way you are nit out of favour with the bank and wont need to change accounts.It is your choice I guess we all think different

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...