Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton  Name of the Claimant ? lowell Solicitors : Overdales solicitors  How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  13 may 2024 What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 1. the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account (16 digits) 2. The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. 3. The debt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  4. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?   Not to my knowledge. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online but it was for a smaller amount they kept on increasing this with me asking Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. It was assigned to a debt collection agency  Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes I also made offers to pay original creditor a smaller amount but was not replied to Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant and got a less paid job I also spent some time on furlough during covid and spent some 3 months on ssp off work. What was the date of your last payment? May 2021 Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes at the time I communicated with all my creditor's that I was running out of funds to pay the original agreements once my redundancy money ran out that was when my accounts defaulted. I then wrote to all my creditor's with pro rata offers of payments but debt collectors took over the accounts.
    • Just an update for all. I received about a letter every other week, increasing in threat levels. Then I hadn't had one for a about two weeks, then Saturday received a carbon copy of the very first letter they sent me in February. Made me laugh, rinse and repeat. 
    • So, your response was not received by the SCP as you did not send it with a valid stamp. Therefore, from my two option in post #14, the first option is the only one available to you, but you do not have the option of asking to be sentenced at the fixed penalty level as the reason the SCP did not receive your response was down to you. Here's a reminder of what to do: Respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box state that you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. This is a tried and tested method to deal with your problem and is almost always successful. Before the pandemic it was necessary to attend court to do this "deal" because it needs the agreement of the police prosecutor.. During the pandemic courts made every effort to have as few  people as possible attend and they began doing this deal under the "Single Justice" procedure without the defendant's attendance. Some courts have carried this procedure on whilst others have reverted to a personal attendance being necessary. If you are required to attend, your case will be taken out of the SJ procedure and you will be given a date for a hearing in the normal Magistrates' Court. If that is the way they do it in the area involved you will have to attend, see the prosecutor and offer your "deal" in person. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SPML/LMC anyone claimed for mis selling and unfair charges?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well that's what all the banks thought didn't they over bank charges and PPI and people didn't think they could ever take them on as they were far too big to take on..WRONG :D

 

Indeed correct but look at them now they're not paying out anymore and problem wont have to either. Therefore once we blow this out of the water and expose the mortgage criminals they will shortly be protect in some way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed correct but look at them now they're not paying out anymore and problem wont have to either. Therefore once we blow this out of the water and expose the mortgage criminals they will shortly be protect in some way.

 

If by what we do on here saves just one person from being wrongly repossessed and it all closes down after that, it's been worth it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If by what we do on here saves just one person from being wrongly repossessed and it all closes down after that, it's been worth it.

 

Correct but i think missing my original point i was trying to say maybe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct but i think missing my original point i was trying to say maybe.

 

Not a bit, I am listening to every word, I just like testing the boundaries, that's what makes us so good at all this..we work as one, just test each others minds join them together -then strike! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone on Carmel? This could make a huge difference to everyone!

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Super the market HAS collapsed we just haven't had the wake yet & pushing what now amounts to Monopoly money around the system isn't going to change a thing............. why because no one trusts either the banks or those who govern them

 

Also this securitisation issue is being used in the States to stop thousands of not 10's of thousands of repo.

 

As I have previously pointed out the largest American repo auctioneer is setting up here............ & why do you think that is........... because they know their goose is cooked in their home market because of this

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I'll try to put it another way to see if I can get an answer.

 

Carmel Butler, as most of you will know, made a detailed extensive and authoratative submission to the Treasury Select Committee on THIS very subject. I'm sure given her expertise and her views and the fact that she has made several strong recommendations that she would be willing to appear on someone's behalf or as an expert witness. There will be lots of cases in the offing, and we could help hundreds this month and thousands in the months to come if we can get her contact details. Obviously it's her choice. So ANYONE ???obviously do NOT POST ON OPEN!!!

 

Cheers.

  • Haha 1

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, lets up the tempo a bit:

 

I received this letter from my mortgage company's solicitors today (we're in a tussle just now so I just asked a question so I could remind the judge when I went before him :D) This, if people have a repossession action going on, is the likely response you're going to get:

 

" We refer to your emails of 5 March 2009 requesting disclosure and documentation regarding whether your account and the further advance has been securitised.

 

We remind you of Civil Procedure Rule 31.6 which sets out the documents parties are required to disclose under Standard Disclosure. This section is set out below:

 

“Standard disclosure — what documents are to be disclosed

31.6 Standard disclosure requires a party to disclose only —

(a) the documents on which he relies; and

(b) the documents which

(I) adversely affect his own case;

(ii) adversely affect another party’s case; or

(iii) support another party’s case; and

© the documents which he is required to disclose by a relevant practice direction.”

 

Our Client is not obliged to disclose the information you request since it is not information upon which our client relies and it does not affect your liability for the mortgage repayments nor is it relevant to your pleaded case. Accordingly the information does not adversely affect our client’s case, adversely affect your case or support your case. Further, the disclosure you request is not required by any other practice direction.

Accordingly, our client will not be providing the information requested.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Now you might be forgiven for thinking they got something they'd rather I hadn't asked wouldn't you? All I need now is a response :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smarterchick,

 

Great post. Turn their words on them!

 

It is noted that the claimant states that they are not disclosing the information because the claimant does not inted to rely on that evidence.

 

However, you will note that CPR 31.6 obliges the claimant to disclose "(b)(i) documents which adversely affect his own case and (b)(ii) support another party's case".

 

The documents that you have requested fall within the scope of those rules and indeed, the information you requested supports your case and therefore falls within CPR 31(b)(i) of the rule. Therefore the claimant is obliged to make the disclosure.

 

Also, it is clear that the real reason for failure to disclose is that the documents requested adversely affects the claimant's case and therefore falls within the scope of CPR 31.6(b)(ii). As such, the claimant is obliged under both rules to make full and frank disclosure. Failure to make the disclosure in compliance with CPR 31.6 renders the claimant in violation of the rule.

 

Therefore, insist that they make the disclosure. Acknowledge that they do not intend to rely on the information that you have requested, but point out that you do intend to rely on the information and they are duty bound at law to provide the information under CPR31.6(b)(i) and (ii).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree entirely just thinking of the reality of it and what the government would allow. For example the test case that is with the bank charges will almost certainly result in them being deemed unlawful etc etc etc but I bet your bottom dollar that no one else is going to get paid out indefinately due to the financial implications on these people that are continuously protected. Don't get me wrong I'm in on the fight with all this and will do everything and anything I can to bring them down but I'm also looking at the reality it and how the government will step in regardless!!

 

 

I'm on record as saying this has to be absolutely copper-bottomed Sced. 110% copper bottomed before its wheeled out. I've shut up about it because I have taken it to a government institution for appraisal.

But the beauty of it is, is that *if* we can get it right, this operates in the County Court as a straightforward point in law: "does the "plaintiff" have the right to have a charge on this mortgage and enforce it."

 

Its going to take a lot of effort to get this any higher (where it can be dragged out and obfuscated about for years a'la bank charges) - and thats fine, because we only have to persuade one judge, in a County Court per repo brought.

No need for it to go any higher *if* it's done right, if its copper-bottomed, if the judge cannot argue with the law put before him.

In knowledge lies wisdom

 

Mo - not even a bar-stool lawyer, but I'll help where I can...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

GUYS

 

It's clearly **** or bust. Therefore we need the following:

 

1. Someone with the balls and the nous to take it on. So anyone who has a repo in the next month from any of these sharks should be working flat out to get it 110% copper bottomed as LOTM has suggested. Every i dotted & every t crossed.

 

Superslueths advice is 2nd to none on this but even He/she (sorry supersleuth I haven't read your profile!) can't do everybody's (or even one person's) documentation, assembly of evidence and preparation of bundle. So it needs someone to test the water, because if no-one does then the sad tide of repos will go up and up and up at everyone's (ever long lasting expense)

 

2. No-one should, in the words of the great W Bush 'misunderestimate' the nature of the task. However, this is after all a pilot show, a toe testing of the water. County court decisions are NOT binding either on other County courts or further up the hierarchy. However there is an appeal process if the District Judge is not interested.

 

They're handling more and more repos and don't want complex legal argument and masses of documentation put forward before them as if it were a case in CA or HOL. Treading carefully is therefore of the utmost importance. In fact i regard this of such fundamental importance that we peeps need to keep shtum on this because there will always be a trawler for the oppo.

 

3. More is needed to make this stick but one man challenged the banks on their charges and....

 

 

I have more to say on this but only on PM

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

GUYS

 

It's clearly **** or bust. Therefore we need the following:

 

1. Someone with the balls and the nous to take it on. So anyone who has a repo in the next month from any of these sharks should be working flat out to get it 110% copper bottomed as LOTM has suggested. Every i dotted & every t crossed.

 

Superslueths advice is 2nd to none on this but even He/she (sorry supersleuth I haven't read your profile!) can't do everybody's (or even one person's) documentation, assembly of evidence and preparation of bundle. So it needs someone to test the water, because if no-one does then the sad tide of repos will go up and up and up at everyone's (ever long lasting expense)

 

2. No-one should, in the words of the great W Bush 'misunderestimate' the nature of the task. However, this is after all a pilot show, a toe testing of the water. County court decisions are NOT binding either on other County courts or further up the hierarchy. However there is an appeal process if the District Judge is not interested.

 

They're handling more and more repos and don't want complex legal argument and masses of documentation put forward before them as if it were a case in CA or HOL. Treading carefully is therefore of the utmost importance. In fact i regard this of such fundamental importance that we peeps need to keep shtum on this because there will always be a trawler for the oppo.

 

3. More is needed to make this stick but one man challenged the banks on their charges and....

 

 

I have more to say on this but only on PM

 

Just for the record despite my possible controversal comments on the outcome of this becomeing public and the government protection after. I am actually in the process of building a case against my so called lender in respect of the fact they did not have a legal right to issue proceedings against me which resulted in a suspended reposession order. My case it taking sometime to build as I want to be sure that I have everything covered and I understand as much as I can everything I am going to say and everthing that maybe thrown back at me. I am also writing to my so called lender and asking them questions that in turn the responses i get back will be used against them in court. I have a suspended order in which my so called lender breaches every month so when I do finally take this to court they will look stupid from the moment the hearing starts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lost sight of your prior controversial comments. will need therefore to go back through the posts. In the initial circumstance could you give some basic details of their claim and your defence, and why it resulted in a suspended order? THIS WOULD BE MOST GRATEFULLY RECEIVED! Your lenderv if you want to PM me would also be good

 

Cheers EIE. Keep the Faith.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lost sight of your prior controversial comments. will need therefore to go back through the posts. In the initial circumstance could you give some basic details of their claim and your defence, and why it resulted in a suspended order? THIS WOULD BE MOST GRATEFULLY RECEIVED! Your lenderv if you want to PM me would also be good

 

Cheers EIE. Keep the Faith.

 

Hi,

 

Read a thread which I started a while ago and gives some details of my situation for your information.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgages-secured-loans/175426-mortgage-securitisation-preferred.html

 

Out of interest did you ever find your SPV?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Just a thought for those that are asking for Carmel's help then as SuperSleuth suggests the house of commons evidence to point to the fact that she is a New York lawyer. However that said Carmel did reference this website so it maybe likely that she looks at this site and even this thread so again is most likely if this is the case then the help we are all looking for is being done in other ways like the House of Commons evidence as that i'm sure didn't just spring from nowhere. It maybe worth a thought that Carmel is unable to use this site for professional reasons etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of knowing your stuff, I've been up half the night digging...I'm not a techo wizzard by any stretch of the imagination, but would this tool help us find anything or is it just a system software where we have to input our own loan portfolio data? http://www.fitchratings.com/web_content/product/resiemea/resiemea_validation_userguide.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll check this out but it may take me some time as I'm at work. In the meantime if anybody else checks it out, please let us know. I think this looks promising but as far as SPPL are concerned I think the securitised loans were credit rated by standard and poor. Could still throw up soemthing. Also check Moodys. One of these greedy muppets gave Lehman brothers a clean bill of health on the day it collapsed. Search BBC World Service for the podcast Assignment rating the credit ratings. Very interesting listening and directly relevant to us.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Check out this blog site where the House of Commons Butler evidence is discussed with a barrister that calls himself FatBigot. It relates to the false/imposter lender's legal title to sue.

 

Mark Wadsworth: "Are securitisation companies above the law?"

 

 

Hi All, there's been further discussions with the FatBigot...keep an eye out on this blog

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of knowing your stuff, I've been up half the night digging...I'm not a techo wizzard by any stretch of the imagination, but would this tool help us find anything or is it just a system software where we have to input our own loan portfolio data? http://www.fitchratings.com/web_content/product/resiemea/resiemea_validation_userguide.pdf

 

 

Hiya, I joined up and downloaded it, but it doesnt *seem* to be anything useful without the info to put in it?

 

See if this works for you - I signed up with them to get it LOL http://www.fitchratings.com/jsp/corporate/DownloadModel.faces?context=4&detail=9&model_type_id=18

In knowledge lies wisdom

 

Mo - not even a bar-stool lawyer, but I'll help where I can...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent Rebuttal to FatBigot from Anononymous on the blogspot. I am now in the process of enforcing Disclosure by writing to the court and shall ask for indefinite adjournment until they fully comply with CPR 31 and my SAR.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...