Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell CCJ Issued for 27 year old LLoyd OD debt ***Settled*** help lowells didn't inform the court - now3mts later it's killing my file


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Todd from Toddmorden said:

Do I come clean with them and say that I intend to set aside? Wont that make them more determined to dig their heels in?

 

If it was SB when they issued the claim and you can prove it, it doesn't matter what they do they are caught out, when did you last pay anything?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i have letters from Lowells from across the years  and then in the mail, from when I returned I have a claimform

 

I havent had any contact with Lowells or Lloyds regarding this debt I would estimate for at least 10 years and certainly not in the last 6 years .

 

I am going through my bank accounts and any other documentation I can find now to see if I had any communication with them before then 

- is it possible that there could have been another creditor before Lowells that Lloyds had passed the debt on to ?

 

The original debt was an unpaid credit card as far as I can remember

 

many thanks

 

Also I would like to say that I really appreciate the help, its really kind

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't matter you might have gotten or sent letters, those cannot reset the SB clock.

 

if you didn't pay/use this card for 6yrs before the claimform date

then go ring Lowell solicitors and tell them you want them to set aside the CCJ by mutual consent FOC to you (saves you the N244 £255 fee)

once you have explained the debt was already SB's we have known them to do so.

you'll need the CCJ number

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your patience

OK I have gone through some old bank accounts and paperwork

 

I think this is the case - although I am still trying to get hold of more information including an old account

 

About 10 years ago I lived in a different city (London). 

I went to see a debt advisor .

I made an agreement to pay £1 a month to the debt, which was not Lowells at the time.

This was a direct debit from an account, which I havent had any dealings with since this time, registered at my London address. There wasnt much in there but over the years the money has been paying into the Debt

 

I am trying to get hold of access to the account 

- I dont have any of the details for it although I know which bank it is.

 

I am having a sinking feeling as I think that there has been £1 paying this off up to less than the 6-year-ago date

 

Best regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell CCJ Issued for 27 year old LLoyd Credit Card debt

payments to whom?

 

direct to Lloyds?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I cant find the paperwork for the agency for whom the debt was made payable too.

 

It looks like the orginal account was a current account. (I was suprised at this, as I never remember having this level of overdraft as a student)

 

I am going through all the paperwork I can get my hands on now, and I am getting a clearer picture

 

This is from Lowells:

"On 02/02/1999 you entered into an agreement for a Lloyds (current account). You failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and it was later terminated and subsequently assgined to our client by Lloyds Banmlk PLC on 24/11/2016. Notice of the assignment has been previously given to you"

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Todd from Toddmorden said:

subsequently assgined to our client

 

who do they state is their client?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell CCJ Issued for 27 year old LLoyd OD debt

i'd also be ringing northants bulk tomorrow

and asking for a copy of the judgement CCJ by email pdf.

lets be sure what lowells litigated against ..

so far its been a credit card cheque withdrawal

a credit card

now an OD.

 

get the truth from the court.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you say you have the claimform in the mail that came whilst you were away?

 

can you type up the particulars of claim box please verbatim (minus any pers info like AC no')

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Issue Date 03 Jan 2020

 

1, The Defendant entered into an agreement for a Lloyds (Current Account) account under reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (“The Agreement”)

2, The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated

3, The Agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 24/11/2016 by Lloyds Bank PLC and notice given to the Defendant

4, Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £8,022.51 remains due and outstanding

And the claimant claims

a, The said sum of £8,022.51

b, Costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you

 

go ring Lloyds tomorrow

ask last payment date and when they defaulted the account.

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bank accounts don't have agreements unless you remember signing one for an overdraft limit?

you have the a/c number in the poc!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

the one in the poc yes

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to Lloyds

they sent the account to a recovery team in 2008 (and thus I am told the account was defaulted) and closed the account in 2009

 

They received a payment of £1 in Nov 2015 from Credit Security into the debt account.

I was told that credit security had been employed by Lloyds to collect the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And did you make the 1 pound payment towards the alleged debt or was it part of a CCA request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

not going by the story

so it looks like your mates advice shot you in the foot sadly then and has comeback to haunt you again.

you were paying £1PCM and the information from Lloyds tallies with that.

 

its not statute barred 

so I can't see a reason for a set aside

for whatever reason you ignored the claimform, it went to the correct address

the debt itself was being servicedby £1PCM payments till nov 2015, within 6yrs.

 

the only way to stop this appearing on your file is to pay the judgement in full by 3rd march.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it wasnt a CCA request

I went into a local branch of halifax to examine an old account.

I think I have found out what happened.

 

around the time of the default in 2008 / 2009

- I made an agreement with Credit Security (who were employed by Lloyds) to pay off a pound a month.

The account at Halifax was preloaded with around £40 .

And it has been paying this in up til Nov 2015

 

Yes, to your last message

 

So I was out of the country from 30 Dec 2019 to 16 Feb 2020

 

And during this time , a notice of pending CCJ and the Claim form were sent to me and then action took place on 4th feb

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the £40 ran out in 2015 and since then you haven't been paying the agreed instalments. This put you in breach of the instalment agreement and this then opens the door to a county court claim. Had you replenished the account so that the instalments continued to be paid as agreed, then you would have had an excellent defence

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you

 

Is there any case to be made regarding being absent while claims and court occured and thus not being able to respond or to represent?

 

Additionally there is a confusion about the amount owed - Lloyds apparently had made an error some time around 2009 and ten years later refunded some mony into my account (well credited the Lowell account) in Jan 2019  - I am trying to track from Lloyds, what was going on here, bu they will take 5 days to get back to me

 

Edited by Todd from Toddmorden
Link to post
Share on other sites

You will be lucky if Lloyds bother to get back to you at all. Send them an SAR although that will take 30 days – assuming that they comply. Do it now.

In terms of applying for a set-aside, you will need to show that you didn't have knowledge of the claim – and that if you are permitted to defend that you would have a reasonable chance of success.

If you can show that the money that Lloyds is claiming from you is wrong then together with the fact that you were away, you can meet both requirements and you would probably succeed. However, it won't happen real quick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK looks like chances are diminishing

 

Lloyds were relatively helpful, although all the information appears to be spread out across different systems. It would be really hard to tell what the exact sums owed are I guess, as it appear that they put charges in error in 2009, then refunded them in 2019 - and therefore difficult for me to assess what I legitimately owed as it depends on the nature and validity of the orgiginal charges - which in the end is up to Lloyds

 

Is there any value in ringing Lowell ?

 

Edited by Todd from Toddmorden
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...