Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Coast / Welcome Nightmare


bob-k
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 380 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok well email stating their 30days have expired and where is my sar data, having complied with additional details they requested.

remind them that a failure to supply information under an SAR request is a matter that can be escalated to the ICO and to court to enforce disclosure.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that.  No contact number was provided on the correspondance,  I have emailed as outlines.

 

As always, thank you for the advice.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Emails has been recieved after providing the information as requested.  response below

 

Quote

Thank you for your swift reply.

 

If you can please share the tracking number and the name of the individual who received and signed the letter, we will make enquiries with our Post Room.

 

In our initial letter to you we requested that you provide us with further information such as: your interaction with KPMG and scope of your request. As a large multi-disciplinary advisory firm with thousands of clients, we have a complex data retention system and extracting that information without proper scope can lead to inaccuracies and data not identified in accordance with SAR. In the absence of further information from you, we will carry out a reasonable and proportionate search of our systems as set out in guidance by the Information Commissioners Office and required by UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018.

 

We will provide you with a formal response to your request on or before the deadline of 20 June 2022.

Im not sure what extra information they could want, but hopefully they return what is required.  18 days to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have had a reply from KPMG  

Quote

We have carried out a search of KPMG systems using the information provided including a search of the legacy data, and determined that no relevant personal data relating to you has been retained by KPMG. We believe that Interpath Advisory will hold relevant personal data relating to you in their capacity as a Data Controller. You can reach out to them and request your data with the following email: [email protected].

 

You have the right to make a complaint regarding our response at any time to the ICO, the UK supervisory authority for data protection issues, at https://ico.org.uk/global/contact-us/.

 

If you have any queries or concerns about your SAR, please email us on: [email protected]

 

So,  Is it just a simple case of emailing interpath on the chain of emails with KPMG and asking them to provide the same?  Or do I need to send a similar letter to the one sent to KPMG to get the ball rolling?

Im not sure why it becomes my issue or hassle that KPMG divested, however they seem to be implying that it is.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar to them then.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.  Ill drop them an email to find out the process, and where to send, then change the detail on the original letter to KPMG and send

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just attach them our SAR to an email.

Give the 2 welcome a/c numbers.

 

No confusing letters/text needed 

 

Keep it simple stupid (KISS).

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I have emailed twice with no response now.  Ive also emailed back to KPMG to ask them to provide alternative contact information.

 

I havent even had an acknowledgement of my email being received

Link to post
Share on other sites

time to send it by royal mail then.

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look up kpmg on fca register or ico data register.

company house will do.

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 09/02/2020 at 16:47, Andyorch said:

Ed Boyle and Ben Leith of KPMG LLP and Sarah Rayment of BDO LLP were appointed as Joint Liquidators of Welcome Finance - in Liquidation - on 16 December 2019.

 

http://www.wfs.co.uk/

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I’m not sure what to do with this information. 
 

I sent the SAR to KPMG and eventually got this response

 

Quote

 

We have carried out a search of KPMG systems using the information provided including a search of the legacy data, and determined that no relevant personal data relating to you has been retained by KPMG. We believe that Interpath Advisory will hold relevant personal data relating to you in their capacity as a Data Controller. You can reach out to them and request your data with the following email: [email protected].

 

You have the right to make a complaint regarding our response at any time to the ICO, the UK supervisory authority for data protection issues, at https://ico.org.uk/global/contact-us/.

 

If you have any queries or concerns about your SAR, please email us on: [email protected]


I did as instructed, and haven’t had a response. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you sent interpathadvisory an email , that hasn't worked.

 

You can enforce an SAR 30 day failure through the ICO and through court but only if you sent it by royalmail , get free proof of posting from any po counter 

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would try and narrow it down to the data controller

though the UK head office is ok.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grand. Thanks. 

 

So. As if by magic, a reply from interpath basically stating they don’t have my files anymore. So that’s both KPMG and Interpath saying they don’t hold my data

 

Quote

Welcome Financial Services Limited – now dissolved (the ‘Company’ or ‘Welcome Finance’)

Registered Number – 00133540

Former Joint Liquidators – Ed Boyle, David Pike and Sarah Rayment

 

We write further to the DSAR submitted with your below email.

 

We note that this DSAR is in relation to Welcome Finance- Ed Boyle and David Pike (both of Interpath Limited and formerly of KPMG LLP) and Sarah Rayment (of BDO LLP) previously acted as Joint Liquidators of Welcome Finance.

 

The former Joint Liquidators were appointed on 16 December 2019.  The former Joint Liquidators had a statutory obligation to retain certain records, and they have done so, however, as you will appreciate the Company held large volumes of customer records and it was not cost effective to retain these records for an indefinite period.

 

Therefore, following extensive consultation and a thorough review of the Company and customer records; following the first and final dividend payment to the unsecured creditors in the liquidation, the Company no longer had any legal justification for retaining customer records and accordingly this data was securely destroyed.

 

The only exception to the above was personal data relating to a claim, complaint or prior subject access request submitted during the liquidation (prior to the dividend payment), which was retained to substantiate the actions of the former Joint Liquidators of the Company during their time in office.

 

We can confirm that we hold no personal data in relation to you.

 

Further information on individuals rights and how liquidators use personal data is included in our privacy notice, which can be found at https://www.interpathadvisory.com/privacy-insolvency.

 

If you wish to make a complaint about the way we process personal data, you have the right to complain to our supervisory authority. In the UK, that is the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). More details on how to complain are available on the ICO's website at: https://ico.org.uk/concerns/

 

Yours sincerely

 

Does this mean I’m screwed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there a need?

 

you've moved so the loan is no longer secured

its not on your credit file, defaulted more than 6yrs ago...

 

so... what harm is this doing you?

are you still paying it?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve moved. But still own the property it’s secured against. Still paying £55 a month. Still being hassled by coast. Can’t sell the original property due to negative equity….

Link to post
Share on other sites

remember the story now

you never did post up the SAR you got

neither did you reveal the wording of the charge that shows on your deeds.

 

 

and i suppose it needs to be asked is how does the other party feel about this 2nd charge you got, when you indicate you were not allowed to do that.

 

have you got a copy of the agreement too?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got the SAR from Coast. It was posted. 
 

 you are correct in the charge. Wasn’t able to get that. Will start on that today

 

The other party is a government department a help to buy type scheme. They aren’t aware. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the SAR never worked go check it 

 

Agreement and deeds too 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...