Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vanquis card charges reclaiming


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1585 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

statements?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep got the statements too.

 

There is about £250 of charges that Vanquis added after the last payment by me, before the account defaulted.

There is also quite a few late payment fees in the months running up to this when I was behind. Should I add these up too?

 

The final figure from 2014 is exactly what Lowell are chasing, so it doesn't look like they have added anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

add up ALL of them. Remember, lowell just have a number on a spreadsheet. They have no idea of the account itself. Nor do they care.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

no ROP [PPI]??

DCA cant add anything no..

 

use the CISHEET at their [vanquis ] int rate in box d15.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

will help you fill in our reply form of that attachment in post 4 of the thread andy points too above

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just skimmed through adding up all the late charges and interest.

this comes to about £950 of the £1700 total.

Which is about 60% of the debt & the same as the offer Lowell made last year (removing 60% of the 1700 total).

 

I've added a very rough calculation in the CI sheet.

 

last interest added was July 2014, 1654 days ago.

(I've just added the whole lot on one day for now.)

 

Is this correct?

 

What is the ci sheet actually telling me?

Capture.PNG

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

How much you have been unlawfully change d in penalty fees and the int they caused.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just under £1000 of the 1700 total is 'over limit charges' or 'Billed finance charges default interest',

 

This is 60% of the debt, and the same as the amount they reduced to debt by last year if I paid.

 

The CI sheet looks like it is PPI related. I did not have PPI so should I ignore this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No its a muli purpose

Fill it out put each fee in on its own

Dont ever ring the fleecers again!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the calculation from the Ci sheet with each fee added with correct dates.

 

I've just released I should probably only be adding the £12 late fee charges on the Ci sheet and not all the interest charges etc.

 

So here is with only charges.

 

The total is pretty much the same as the debt they are chasing.

 

Ok, I think that was still wrong because the claim to date was auto filled.

 

I've changed it to the date of the last charge.

 

Does this look correct?

Capture.GIF

Capture2.GIF

CI Sheet Final.GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are entitled to the cisheet sum +8% from the day after their last int charging till the day they settle

so put that total from the CISHEET

in a copy of the statint sheet the day after the claim to date.

 

should be about £500-£600 extra.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok got it. 8% on top of what comes out of the CISHEET.

 

But sorry, I'm still not sure if I'm filling in the CI Sheet correctly.

 

I know I should be writing a line for each £12 Overlimit charge but what about the following.

 

Billed Finance charges purchase interest

Billed Finance charges cash interest

Billed Finance charges default fee interest

 

(these look like standard interest charges)

 

If my last post is correct the total is £385 (all £12 charges at 39% interest) + stat interest of £140 (8%)

= £525.

 

This is half what they offered to remove from the debt last year?

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

any fixed sum penalty fee only.

 

default fee? that's unlawful too.

 

if you can see its a fixed sum...by that, you understand already that's £12 etc etc the it goes on the cisheet on its date

then that sum you can get 8% stat int on from the day after they stop charging their int, to the day they settle.

 

how are gauging the date they stopped card int?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm ok that sounds like what I've already done... Any flat charge or penalty is on the ci sheet.

 

For the cisheet interest end date, I just used the date on the last entry of the statement. Bit thinking about it they were probably charging interest until it was sold to Lowell? How can I find out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you not already got all the statements?

each one will show interest.

 

I would be naming the charges correctly on your CI sheet too

if it late payment state that

if its over limit state that.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok will put the correct description on ci.

 

Yep have all the statements.

All the interest and charges added up come to £1000, this is standard interest too. Not just on the late fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cisheet claim to date is last int charged date

 

just one point

you haven't added int into the CIsheet items have you

in otherwords

the only things that are listed are fixed sum fees

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I've just had another look at the CI and Stat interest sheets. There was no PPI on this account. 

 

Total of debt bought by Lowell = 1750.29

 

minus

 

Compound interest = £452.59

Statutory Interest = £486.57

 

£811.13 enforceable

 

What I find strange is that I have a letter from Lowell financial dated 2017, offering to close the account for £700.12 (60% of the total). This is less than what I calculate to be enforceable. 

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls CISheet v101.xls

image.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thanks for your help so far DX. 

 

I just wondered if you could double check my understanding and a couple on dates on my CI and stat int sheets?

 

Stat Interest  - This is 8% on all the charges from the day they were taken until today?

CI Sheet - This is how much interest Vanquis charged on the £12 fees from thee date of the fee until last interest charge?

 

Account Opened - 12/02/2012

Last Interest Charge - 20/07/2014

Default Served - 27/06/2014

 

Overall I have 30 * £12 charges. 

 

Stat Interest  = £184

Compound interest = £146

30 * £12 charges = £360

 

Total  = £690

 

CISheet.xls StatIntSheet v101.xls

Edited by puma85
Link to post
Share on other sites

You really need to start a new thread if you intend to reclaim charges.....as it has no connection to this thread and the court claim and simply cluttering up this topic.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

new thread for the charges reclaiming 

use this only for the reclaiming not the court claim please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, puma85 said:

Stat Interest  - This is 8% on all the charges from the day they were taken until today?

CI Sheet - This is how much interest Vanquis charged on the £12 fees from thee date of the fee until last interest charge?

already explained in post 11

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

corrected statint sheet so total reclaim to date 

StatIntSheet v101.pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...