Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car pile up on A road, car written off, TPFT only


The Phantom
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1445 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

it doesn't matter if she responds. What you're doing is laying a paper trail. Make sure that you send the letter at least by first class recorded delivery so you have proof

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/media/971792/npcc-guidelineschargingpoliceservices_v14_3_april-2019_v1.pdf

 

page 29

 

this doesn't tally up with what I have been told, I have to contact the collisions unit again and double check the pricing for this.

I will e-mail them now to get a written response and cost for my specific report

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about putting the correct figure. Simply warn her that it is likely that the fee will be involved which you understand "maybe as much as £350 – blah blah".

The important thing is to get the letter off quickly and to have a paper trail. You don't have to worry about all the teas crossed in the i's dotted et cetera

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to recap, as it has been a few days.

Letter sent as suggested in post above, no response (so far)

 

Time is up on Tuesday and MCOL claim will be made, I will use the short summary as suggested by BF a few posts above.

 

I will tick the box to say more detailed Particulars of claim will be sent within 7 days. I will upload a draft of those more detailed Particulars later

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote


Claim reference number XXX



Between XXX – claimant
and
XXX – defendant





Particulars of claim

  1. On the 17th of December 2019 the Claimant was driving home from work on the A38 west bound in her Ford Fiesta, registration WV      , when traffic came to a sudden halt. The Claimant had to break sharply as the vehicle in front made an emergency break and came to a stop. At this moment a collision occurred when the Defendant ,driving a white Seat Leon, registration WL drove with some speed into the back of the Claimant's vehicle.

 

  1. The defendant pushed the Claimant's vehicle forward and into the stationary vehicle in front, a Toyota Auris with registration WG

 

  1. The collision was caused by the Defendant's negligent driving and the Claimant's vehicle.

 

  1. The claimants vehicle registration WV         suffered serious damage and has been assessed as not economically repairable.

 

  1. An independent damage report by Davies & Gray (Claims Assessors / Valuers) has put the estimated repair costs at £6716.52 and put the vehicle status as 'Beyond Repair MIAFTR Category B' and the matter to be dealt with on a total loss basis

 

  1. The claimant has attempted to correspond with the defendant and her insurer and has received no reply.

 

  1. Eventually and to mitigate the losses of all concerned losses, the claimant has since disposed of the vehicle in order to put a halt to ongoing storage costs.

 

  1. The defendant and her insurers have been notified of all actions and possible costs and yet have failed to respond

 

Particulars of Defendant's Negligence

 

  1. The defendant drove too fast in all the circumstances.
  2. The defendant failed to see the Claimant's motor vehicle in sufficient time to avoid colliding with it or at all.
  3. The defendant failed to stop, slow down, swerve or in any other way so to manage or control her said vehicle as to avoid the said collision

 

  1. 2. By reason of the matters aforesaid the Claimant suffered losses

 

  1. Particulars of Claimant's Losses

 

14.  Ford Fiesta vehicle, WV ……. £1690 less £40 received in salvage value = £1650

15.  Recovery from scene of accident and stoarge costs at Field Services in Ivybridge…..£850

16.  Independent damage report from Davies & Gray, Claims assessors / Valuers …...£78

17.  Postage / Communication costs……… £20

 

  1. The Defendant is liable for the Claimant's losses arising from this road traffic accident and has been asked to pay for these losses totalling £2598

 

  1. The Defendant has failed to pay the said sum and remains indebted to the Claimant.

 

  1. The Claimant is entitled to interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date the debt was due being the 20th January 2020 to the present date (15 days) at the daily rate of 57p making a total sum of £8.55 and continuing at the daily rate of 57p.

 

 

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

 

1 . The sum of £2598

 

2 . Interest in accordance with section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at such rate and for such period as the court sees fit.

 

3. Costs.

 

 

Statement of Truth I believe that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true.

 

 

Dated this …...

To the court and to the Defendant

 

 

Ms ABC / Claimant

 

I think you have to serve this on the defendant within seven days of issuing the claim and also complete a certificate of service which you can download from the court site.

Send this particulars of claim by first class recorded delivery mail.

Check to see that it's completely accurate.

I've suggested removing the reference to the reports and so forth. This is evidence and really you should stick to pleading the facts of the accident here.

It wasn't even really necessary to talk about the fact that you contacted them and that they didn't respond – but it will help to put a bit of pressure on her I suppose.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just checked the tracking on the last letter I sent to her. (About the additional costs for the police report as suggested a few posts above)

Royal Mail couldn't deliver the letter as nobody was in, so it is at the local delivery office awaiting collection since last week.

Should I send another copy with the particulars of claim if she simply doesn't collect the letter from the Delivery Office ?

She may suspect it has something to do with this and won't bother to collect it and sign for it ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, send her a copy by ordinary first class post with no tracking.

Fill out a certificate of service and refer to both letters in it

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to do a certificate of service Form N215 for the extended particulars of claim, I had a look and there is enough space to list the letter as well.

 

It asks for two dates though, "on what day did you serve" and "the date of service is"

I suppose one is the date I posted it and the other is the expected date of delivery, but it would be different for the extended particulars of claim and the letter discussed above (I posted that this morning). Would it be better to do two separate certificates of service ?

n215-eng.pdf

Edited by The Phantom
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just put the most recent one – the one that was simply sent by ordinary first class post. Yes if you wanted you could do to certificate the service – why not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost completed the MCOL claim form, your summary was spot on, it fitted but only just. 

Mine would have been way too long.

 

Just one more before I hit send, the lady gave me her name as Sue, but when checking her name and address it has come to show that her full name appears to be Susan Elizabeth (she is listed as a company director at the address she gave me)

So her name and address come up on company check websites.

Should I use her full correct name or what appears to be her nickname she gave me and she used on her letter to me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go for her full name.

Also if she is a company director, you want to hope that she is not going to say that she was driving a company car on company time and that in fact you should be suing the company

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I have no way of knowing that, she only gave me her private details at the scene of the accident.

Including her shortened name.

 I only found her full name when I wanted to check whether her address was correct (when she didn't respond to anything)

When I google her name it pops up on a company check website.

She has two active directorships, one is for a local Gymnastics Club (?) and one for a Consultancy where she is a Company Secretary. Neither of these are registered at the address she has given me, which I believe is her home address

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's done.

Just finished the process, got my claim number.

 

Will send the expanded particulars of claim Tomorrow or Thursday. It says I have to send them within 14 days of the claim having been served. I think the claim will be deemed served by the end of the week or so. So I have a good amount of time to get them out.

 

I will come back with any updates as and when they happen

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim was issued yesterday, I got a notice of issue in the post today and I believe the defendant got her paperwork also today, as I had a sudden and unexpected flurry of Direct Line phone calls this afternoon whilst I was at work and two e-mails from Direct Line, as well.

 

I wasn't home when they called, my partner took the call and told them to put in writing what they needed to tell me as I wouldn't deal with anything over the phone.

Apparently they told him they wanted to 'make amends' with me and therefore needed to talk to me.

He still told them to send a letter and not bother with the phone calls as everything had to be done in writing, so not sure what they will do now.

 

Should I engage with Direct Line at this stage, as they now seem to have developed a sense of urgency in this matter.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S. The two e-mails from Direct Line are basically asking me to provide them with required information to process the claim...which is ridiculous considering I already sent a mountain of information and paperwork to their customer since December who claims has passed it all on to Direct Line.

They were also copied into letters I sent to their client

Now as the court papers have dropped on her doormat they want me to supply them with it all again, as they only now seem to get started on this....

I must say this is shocking

 

Should I write them a letter telling them to contact their client who has all the information including the amount due ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you have no correspondence with direct line. If they  ask for some information then as a matter of courtesy you might want to send it to the defendant with a note saying that this was apparently required by her insurer but you will not be dealing with them.

I can imagine that direct line has started to contact you because the defendant has been on the phone to them in a panic and so now they are starting to sit up and pay attention. That was the purpose of issuing proceedings.

Stay your ground. Follow the process – but I suspect things will start moving along fairly quickly now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case you should contact the client with a copy of direct lines admission and tell her that she should immediately complete the paperwork that she receives from the court and admit your claim completely plus costs. Tell her you will then be immediately applying for judgement and if she wants to avoid a CC J registered against her and blighting her credit file she should make sure that the judgement sum is paid as soon as possible and in any event that the money is cleared funds within 28 days

Make sure you monitor everything. Observe all deadlines and give no ground at all until the money is absolutely in your account – every penny.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean this may now sound comical, but they have  even offered me a hire car now...  🙄🙄

Almost two months after the accident and almost four weeks after I got rid of what was left of my car.

 

Never mind, I will do as suggested above and post that tomorrow to her, so she hopefully has it Saturday or Monday

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, I've slightly lost track. Did you send the extended particulars of claim? If not, then you must send it even though they have admitted liability in principle. Follow proper procedure absolutely until you get a full admission and the money is in the bank.

If they have for your hire car then I should certainly take it if I were you.

They are idiots.

By the way, although this probably could have been sorted out about two weeks earlier, I suppose Christmas and New Year got in the way – but in effect this is a model example of how to deal with an insurer in this kind of circumstance.
The assertive, take control and keep control and react quickly every step of the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...