Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
    • have a look at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/451423-pra-letter-of-claim-old-barclaycard-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5256506 the docs in this thread are what you should get. if the agreement the correct date for signup and does the PRA or BC cover letter use the word reconstructed? dx
    • sounds like lesley. They'll respond some rubbish I'm sure.  
    • Even if they have crawled back under the stone, remember they have six years to bring a claim. Let them know if you ever change address.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link and 2 MBNA cards - CCA response


cleanbill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Back in February 2018 I sent Link Financial a CCA Section 78 request relating to 2 MBNA credit cards.

 

I had , stupidly, been paying off the debt on these cards on a monthly basis, but stopped the payments once Link failed to respond to the request in the required timeframe.

 

Last week, they sent me through the agreements I had electronically signed with MBNA when the credit cards were originally taken out. 

 

A couple of things that struck me as odd on this: first, the letters from MBNA to Link are dated March 2018, so only 1 month after I sent the request to Link. 

 

Secondly, why would Link wait for 17 months to send this through to me?

 

They are now requesting I contact them to set up a monthly payment again. 

 

Any advice appreciated here

- do I have anything to go back on, or

do I need to contact them to set up the payment? 

 

My credit file is getting much better, so don't want to do anything that will adversely affect it again.

 

Thanks for any advice here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan redact and upload what they have sent you .

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Link and 2 MBNA cards - CCA response

Are you currently making payments to Plink ? If not when was your last payment to MBNA ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And started paying the debt collector when ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No 6 year gap then unfortunately.......

 

Early on line applications using the tick box verification where also backed up with a hard copy sent to you for signature to return.You will note that near the acceptance box they refer to cancellation rights which would be sent separately....this is normally sent with the hard copy.

 

So there must be a further copy with your actual hand written signed agreement.I would hazard a guess that the above is in fact a reconstituted version of the agreement with the tick boxes added to further its authenticity.

 

You could write further and request a copy of the cancellation rights and also a copy of the IP verification and time of signature. Section 7 of the Electronic Communications Act 2000 recognises the validity of such an electronic signature by providing that an electronic signature is admissible as evidence of authenticity.

 

However for an agreement of this date 2007........

 

Published: 06/03/2014

 

Consumers who apply for credit on-line will be able to electronically complete the credit agreement over the internet from 31st December 2004, the UK's Consumer Minister Gerry Sutcliffe announced yesterday.10 Dec 2004 .At the moment, while consumers can apply for credit on-line, the contract is not complete until the consumer has signed a paper copy of the agreement.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andyorch - very much appreciated.

 

So if I respond with the following - that should suffice?  

 

Having reviewed the documents provided I note they only appear to have the ‘ticked box’ acceptance, as applies to an online application.   At the time these accounts were taken out with MBNA, the contract would not have been considered legally complete until I had signed and returned a paper copy of the agreement.

 

In accordance with the Section 77/78 request, please can you provide me with the copies of the agreement which have my full signature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cleanbill said:

Thanks Andyorch - very much appreciated.

 

So if I respond with the following - that should suffice?  

 

Having reviewed the documents provided I note they only appear to have the ‘ticked box’ acceptance, as applies to an online application.   At the time this account was allegedly taken out with MBNA, the contract would not have been considered legally executed until I had signed and returned a paper copy of the agreement. 

 

In accordance with the Section 77/78 request, please can you provide me with the copies of the agreement which have my full signature complete with proof of authenticated and verified with timestamp and IP Address pursuant to  Electronic Communications Act 2000 and notice of cancellation rights pursuant  to the Distance Selling Regulations.

 

 

Few amendments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it wise to tip link off?

 

wait for them to/if issue a letter of claim?

 

it cant comeback on your file, other than a CCJ, as MBNA would have defaulted these years ago.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant remember the last time I saw a Link Claim DX......time to test this Debt Collector and see if they can respond. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Dates would be helpful....are they the same letter or seperate ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for redacting too much.  The letters are dated 26 September, and arrived together (same envelope).

 

The received date referenced on their letter is 19 September.

 

Does that give you what you need?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no there is not

let it run as per andyorchs last comments 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

no

they are quite entitled to ask for payment

you are equally quite entitled to tell them to do one.

but that invites pointless letter tennis.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...