Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
    • upload sites dont retain copies and so what if they do... what do you think they are going to do, kidnap your grannies budgie or something..how the hell would any of the info required by us be of any use to them..... stop being paranoid and put them all in one mass multipage pdf.  
    • https://audicam.audi.co.uk/customer/6660055/00cc584e9769699ddba3807a2995032f/59022-13062024 Please let me know if you can access footage 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Judges Demand DCA Issue - old nursery debt


morphster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2131 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly I do apologize if this is in the wrong place on the forum:

 

My partner received a letter from Judges Demand demanding just under £2,000 for unpaid nursery fees dating back 4 years ago or there about's.

Now when the letter landed on the doorstep enclosed with it was a "Contract" which printed was my partners name and previous address.

Overleaf was a signature that they claim is my partners which is far from her signature used on things such as driving license.

 

Within this said contract there was a term "If payments are more than a week late then entry will be refused until the balance is brought up to date".

My partner is insistent the correct notice was given to end the placement within the setting.

A claim the client strongly denies.

There was an invoice enclosed within this which stated figures only.

Not detailing what the figure was billed for.

 

We sent an email across to ask the following:

 

Could your client please provide me with a true copy of the contract that you claim I've signed as the signature is nothing like my true signature.

Evidence of this can be disclosed upon request.

 

Could your client also please provide me with attendance records along with any correspondence that relates to this matter.

 

Can you client explain why a debt of almost £2,000 was allowed to be accrued before seeking recovery of the amount.

 

Surely as per term one if payments are behind then entry would be refused.

Surely at £170 there must of been some common sense used as to when to begin recovery for the outstanding balance and not allow it to exceed a specific amount.

 

They have said they would like to see a copy of my ID with my signature although have advised doing so would not alter anything to do with the amount they are claiming,

 

To date they've now replied to say that they are unable to provide attendance records based on the time that has elapsed and they are entitled to claim the balance they've raised due to 6 years not passed.

They also cannot provide us with any correspondence sent across to address this matter before passing it to a DCA.

 

They've completely dismissed the quote around allowing the debt to accrue so high before pursuing her for monies.

 

They've said that she's openly admitted liability for the amount therefore they want her to pay

- All correspondence by email.

Upon checking the emails there is no liability admitted whatsoever

 

I'm keen not to just ignore this as I too received one of these that I was liable to pay and I stupidly ignored it

now I've received a letter from the county court bulk center wanting me to answer.

 

The one for me is significantly lower so I don't want to ignore this one.

If anyone can shed any light as to which direction i need to go in.

We only have around £10 per week disposable income between us once our debts are satisfied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally, if you don't pay such nursery fees within a month of attendance, the nursery stops accepting the child.

 

You don't want to get into a game of letter tennis. I think you want to see a copy of the original terms the nursery provided. The terms probably state what happens if nursery fees are not paid i.e. Child is excluded after x amount of time. If the terms state this, then potentially liability is limited.

 

Personally, I think you need to deal with the nursery directly and not contact the DCA again. Consider sending the nursery a data protection subject access request, to get hold of all of their records.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

are they aware of the correct address?

 

don't use email block them!! bounce them

 

judgedemand are a powerless DCA

only the nursery can do court

 

if you have not WRITE to the nursery with the present address

deny any debt.

 

but don't waffle

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do they expect to chase it properly when they have already admitted they don't hold any of the info they need to legally chase it?

 

If they sent a letter via post, demand a full and complete breakdown then don't communicate further till they comply or you get a lba

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, you have a county court claim for N1 do you?

If so you must ascknoledge the receipt of this pronto or you may end up with a default judgement against you and then proper bailiffs will come knocking.

What does the claim say is being claimed and why.

 

Also, you are arguing about likeness of signatures,

this is a red herring if you argreed to entet into a contract or service so be sure of what you think is correct as far as what you received in exchange for your money,

 

what notice period is required for ending the service or contract and match this with what they are claiming.

 

It may be that they say you signed up for a whole school term so owe for that whether the child attended or not.

you will need to read the contract and then decide if they are pulling a fast one or whether you have made a miscalculation with the notice of withdrawal from the nursery

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...