Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

suing a company as they have not fulfilled their obligations - have i won?


itsamomentintime
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6290 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

suing a company as they have not fulfilled their obligations

 

claim issued on 1/11/06

 

acknowledged by defendant on 6/11/06

 

today is 21/11/06 but nothing has been entered as a defence on moneyclaims website

 

have i won?

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be an option to click on MCOL to request a default judgement.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope there isnt anything

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry my mistake - they have 28 days to answer, not 14 - popped my cork to quickly....

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am currently suing a company that i asked to perform an inspection/road test on an M3 EVO that i bought on ebay - claim is at the 'acknowledged' stage and has been since 6/11/06

 

i had prevously used them without a problem, so i stumped up a colossal £274 which paid for an engineers report and a road test. the engineer phoned me and said that he had found a huge problem, being a coolant leak when the cooling system was under pressure. the vendor assured me that there was no leak, and that the engineer hadnt sealed the cooling system properly, causing a leak under pressure.

 

the engineer said he would complete the road test after repairs had been done, but i would have to pay an extra £137 for the road test, which (unbelieveably) i paid. the vendor was admant that there was no leak, so i decided to drive to birmingham and have the car tested at a BMW main dealer. surprise surprise no leak. i asked for a refund on the £137 and for the engineer to be sent out free of charge. i got a refund but was charged £30 for the privilige. they also said that they wouldnt send out the engineer

 

so.......i have paid £307 for a full engineers report and a road test, none of which i have recieved. i wrote to them but their reply suggested that i had fixed the fault myself before the BMW test, which left me fuming.

 

 

what do you think will happen in court?

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that if they try to use that as a defence, they'll have to be able to prove that you could do so. Could you?

 

I also think that you want to ask BMW if they'll provide a copy of their findings. If there had been a "huge oil leak", there'll be traces remaining around where the leak is supposed to have occurred, congealed drips,run-offs, that kind of things. In fact, I suggest you take lots and lots of pictures of the offending area as well, as soon as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bookworm - i have a copy of BMWs report that says there is no leak, also i am sure that BMW would be able to tell if the coolant system had recently had any new parts.

 

i was going to leave it but when they accused me of fixing the problem myself i hit the roof

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they have until 4/12/06 to file a defence

 

incidentally, the car comes highly recommended - if you can you should :D

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

not mine - its a hand-built masterpiece

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they have filed a defence and the case will be moved to the local court - i will let u know what happens

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i will when i recieve it, no problemo

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

recieved defence and Allocation Questionnaire today - whats the best way to post it on here? scan it?

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

AQ hand delivered to court today, i have found a scanner (!), just need to set it up....

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

right cant scan it so here it is:

 

i am XXXX employed as a customer service manager by XXXX

 

we offer vehicle inspections and prepare condition reports for prospective purchasers

 

our service is subject to T's and C's

 

our vehicle inspections are purely visual and no dismantling takes place. the inspection does not carry any guarantee or warranty and none is implied

 

on 30th may 2006 we took a booking to inspect a BMW M3 EVOLUTION reg XXXXX. the inspection costs £274 for a 133 point inspection. payment was made via credit card

 

our engineer was allocated to inspect the car

 

our engineer completed the inspection on 1st june 2006. the inspection was incomplete insofar as the road test had not been undertaken as the engineer reported a serious leak to the cooling system

 

our T's and C's specifically deal with incidents of this nature:

a road test will not be carried out if our engineer deems the car as unsafe or unroadworthy

 

Mr XXXX contacted us on 5th June 2006 concerning the fact that the road test was not completed. he was advised that a re-inspection charge of 50% (£137) would be required for this (this is our normal practice). whilst Mr XXXX raised concerns in an email dated 5th june 2006 concerning the inspection fee, he subsequently accepted and paid the fee, and was advised that the matter was not being treated as a complaint at this time. Mr XXXX was advised that the car should be repaired before the road test can be done.

 

at 4.30pm on 6th june 2006 Mr XXXXrang to cancel the further inspection. he was advised that a fee of £30 would be retained for administration. our normal cancellation fee is £70(!!!!!!!!!!) as identified within our T's and C's

 

on 1st august 2006 i recieved a notification of a complaint from Mr XXXX which was dated 5th july 2006 regarding the inspection service we had carried out. the complaint concerned the fact that we were unable to carry out a road test due to the vehicle being unroadworthy and our cancellation fee of £30 which was levied when Mr XXXX cancelled the re-inspection.

 

an acknowledgement of the complaint was sent to Mr XXXX on 3rd august 2006

 

our engineer was sent a copy of the complaint and supplied his own statement

 

we have had no further contact with Mr XXXX until the issue of the county court claim dated 1st november 2006

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, let me get this straight:

 

They're stating in their defence, that they

a) charged you full whack for an inspection they did not complete,

b) charged you a further fee for completing the inspection,

c) charged you more for NOT completing the inspection?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ha ha ha i didnt think of it in that way - in my wifes words, its a joke

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

here is a copy of the original letter that i sent:

 

Dear sir/madam

 

I am writing to you to express my disgust at the way I have been treated by your company. I recently applied for a vehicle check costing £274. the inspector carried out the test but was unable to complete the road test as he thought he had found a serious water leak when checking the water pressure. He told me to contact the office to arrange a retest, once the water leak had been fixed. I did this, only to be charged a further £137 for a future road test, even though I had already paid for one that had not been done. I contacted the vendor who assured me that the car had no leak, and urged me to get it checked independently. I contacted your offices again to cancel the road test and to get a refund on the £137, which was given to me. However you charged me a cancellation fee of £30, (bear in mind this means I have paid £304 for 2 road tests that have not been carried out).

 

The car was taken to Ryedale BMW in Birmingham and a water pressure test was done at a cost of £50 (copy included). No leak was detected, meaning your engineer had made a mistake, which I wont crucify him for however I take exception to the fact that I have to pay for someone else’s error. Your greedy company provided no help at all, instead you insisted on charging me extra at every turn.

 

Do not seek to blame the engineer, he only made a mistake. The real fault lies with your policy on ripping people off. As a result I want a full refund for:

 

Vehicle test £274

Road test cancellation fee £30

Ryedale water pressure test £50

Travel expenses to Birmingham from and Manchester, and vice versa £30

Total £387

 

If you don’t refund me I will contact my credit card company for a chargeback, as I have a report from you stating that the full vehicle test can’t be done due to a water leak, and I have a statement from BMW saying there is NO water leak. This means you have not provided the service that I have paid for.

 

 

Please respond within 7 days.

 

Regards

 

itsamomentintime

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a feeling that you won't get the full amount back - you'll probably be awarded the £30 and £137 as thats what they deem a road test to be worth (and is the only part not carried out). Did you receive the report about the condition of the car without roadtest? If so you have had some value from the report.

 

Good Luck anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you think i would get £137? they already refunded that you see

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...