Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor IND/Welcome Finance/ CCJ found after getting an interim third party debt order***Settled***


Pearlyj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2203 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

My husband has received a third party debt order for an overdraft on an account that hasn't been used for 13 years

 

The claimant is I.N.D Limited

Defendant is obviously my husband

Third party is Santander

 

There is a date for a court hearing on the document but after trying to discover exactly what this all means we are getting even more confused

 

There is talk of the account being frozen and monies taken but this account no longer has any funds in it as far as we are aware.

 

Do they mean that they will force him to inform them of the account he uses now and if so how does that happen.

 

He has had no contact or made and payment to this account or to any debt collectors

 

Any advice will be greatly appreciated

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

nothing to do with satans bank they must have sold it years ago.

 

looks like IND have gotten a backdoor CCJ and are now going for enforcement

 

have you checked his credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I will do that now

 

We are worried about the possibility of him being forced to declare his current bank account and what will happen in court

 

I will go and check the file now and come back

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have a CCJ number

go ring northants bulk and ask for a copy of the claimform & the CCJ by email PDF tomorrow.

 

when is the hearing date?

 

has he moved since opening the A/C?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have double checked, there is a claim number there and I will get him to ring (doubt they will be there tomorrow due to bank holiday so it may have to be Tuesday I suppose).

 

Yes we have moved since this account was opened. Court date is 25.04.18

 

Do you know if this order only applies to the third party bank account (the Santander one) or will he be. forced to reveal his current banking details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hopefully it wont come to any of that

 

was there a clear 6 yrs before the date of the CCJ where he paid nothing nor used the account?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great so the debt was statute barred before the issuance of the claimform

i'm pretty sure you can get the CCJ nulled [set aside] which will kill everything.

 

this type of dirty trick is a speciality of IND.

 

let our expert andyorch comment too

but you wont be able to do much till Tuesday anyway.

 

you might even be able to get IND to do everything for free to you

else it MIGHT cost you £255 for the set aside.

but you'll get that back me thinks too

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and funny how IND found his correct address after filing everything else to an old one [on purpose no doubt]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

72.6

(4) Any third party other than a bank or building society served with an interim third party debt order must notify the court and the judgment creditor in writing within 7 days of being served with the order, if he claims –

 

(a) not to owe any money to the judgment debtor; or (which you wont because it was statute barred.... once you submit an N244 or get the Judgment claimant to agree by consent to set a side)

(b) to owe less than the amount specified in the order.

 

72.8

(1) If the judgment debtor or the third party objects to the court making a final third party debt order, he must file and serve written evidence stating the grounds for his objections.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part72

 

N244 if the judgment claimant refuses to set a side.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?406095-LEGAL-N244-Application-Notice-**Correct-as-at-Sept-2015**

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to both for this information.

 

Please forgive my ignorance but do we need to write to the court and claimant and complete the form in the first instance

 

The form is a little confusing at first glance so I hope its OK if I ask some more questions.

 

Again many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must approach the judgment claimant first (Solicitor named on the claim form) to ask if they would agree by consent to set a aside...at their cost...if they refuse you then make you own application to set a side using the n244 (fee is £255) hence the requirement to ask if they will do it first.

 

You can claim the fee back within your application (Costs)

 

With regards to the TPDO you must inform the court and judgment claimant...as per above within 7 days of receipt of the notice quoting the above CPR 72.6 a (a) not to owe any money to the judgment debtor) and the reason being.... you are making application to set a side on the grounds that the debt was already statute barred at the time of issuance of the claim.

 

You need to act fast on all the above.

 

Post when your ready to complete the n244 and we will help you with the correct wording.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I have to immediately write to IND Ltd (the claimant) asking them to set aside the CCJ at their cost and stating our reasons (their is no solicitor named on the letter, just IND Ltd and Santander)

 

We also have to write immediately to IDM Ltd and the court telling them we are making an application to set aside the CCJ and our reasons (though we would have already written to IND asking them to do this)

 

Nothing else is done until we receive a response

 

Is that correct

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I have to immediately write to IND Ltd (the claimant) asking them to set aside the CCJ at their cost and stating our reasons (their is no solicitor named on the letter, just IND Ltd and Santander) Correct...phone call would be quicker

We also have to write immediately to IDM Ltd and the court telling them we are making an application to set aside the CCJ and our reasons (though we would have already written to IND asking them to do this)

 

Correct but this is with regards to the Third Party Debt Order Notice you have been served with...different issue quoting CPR 72.6 a to stop the hearing of 25.04.18

 

Nothing else is done until we receive a response

 

Is that correct

 

Many thanks

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we can ring IND Ltd and ask that way about setting aside the CCJ, if they say yes how can we prove they did, will they not just deny they said yes to it to make us overrun the time limit

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should be able to find out who the sols were when you ring northants bulk Tuesday

then as all of post 15.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we can ring IND Ltd and ask that way about setting aside the CCJ, if they say yes how can we prove they did, will they not just deny they said yes to it to make us overrun the time limit

 

Many thanks

 

You send your notice of objection to the Third Party Debt Order now......irrespective of their response to set a side...you have 7 days to do this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sorry if Im not grasping this correctly but I am struggling with the wording of the letter I need to write to the court and IND Ltd

 

I have only managed one line as below as Im unsure what I should be writing and quoting at this stage

 

"To whom it may concern

 

I am writing to you today with regards to the Third Party Debt Order Notice I have been served with"

 

What else do I need to say

 

Any help is much appreciated and I will get these letters posted tomorrow morning

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you scan in the Notice you have received or tell me the NXXX number of the form ?

 

 

" My husband has received a third party debt order for an overdraft on an account that hasn't been used for 13 years

 

The claimant is I.N.D Limited

Defendant is obviously my husband

Third party is Santander "

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...