Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
    • I thought Delinquent ment "missing payments" its active so assumimg it can be seen ? also this is the only thing change on my credit file and that in its self being re added has dropped my credit score . the debt is SB and did drop off my credit file so how have or how can they re add it again ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking with Ease - Betteshanger Country Park, Deal, Kent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2545 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I wonder if someone can advise.

 

My wife received two parkinig charge letters from Parking With Ease both due to their machines constantly failing to recognise the registration number when attempting to make payment.

 

 

On one occasion we worked out we could enter the reg number manually but it then failed to recognise the debit card and just sat there forever.

 

 

We then decided to leave it as we were unsure if payment had been taken.

 

both of these letters were sent and received way outside of the 14 days Notice to Keeper period as stated here

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/schedule/4/enacted

 

I informed them of this on my wife's behalf via their appeals email address and also mentioned the POFA and that the NTK was outside of this period and that they were therefore unable to pursue the registered owner of the vehicle (my wife) for the penalty charge.

 

I also stated that I would report them to the IPC, DVLA if they pursued this further and they came back and said:-

 

"We have not claimed to and are not seeking to use POFA 2012 to pursue the matter, therefore we have no requirement to issue any letters within 14 days."

 

Can someone advise on the next course of action.

Do we send them everything in writing?

They said that we are free to contact the IAS and lodge an appeal with them within 21 days.

 

Just a bit confused on their response and the next step for us to take.

 

Thanks for any advice.

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

first its not a penalty..they are speculative invoices

 

 

can you complete this for each PCN please

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on, if Parking With Sleaze declare they are not relying on POFA then surely there's no keeper liability?

 

Can't the OP simply respond with the old 'take it up with the driver and I'm not obliged to tell you who that was' response?

Link to post
Share on other sites

PWE are dreadful and have a habit of getting things wrong and then blaiming everyone else.

 

 

You made an error by contacting them as now they think that you can be persuaded to pay up by giving you a load more bull and threats of action that they know are really doomed to fail

 

Where was the car aprk and what were the dated of the event.

 

Do not contact them again and certainly do not appeal to the IAS/IPC/Gladstones as they are a disgrace.

 

 

As for their comments about not using the POFA,

this is true but it leaves them stuck with only lies and innuendo left to get you to give up on them.

 

After you have ignored the for a while you may well start getting begging letters from other organisatiosn such as dca's.

 

 

You can ignore them as well but if you get a letter threatening court action from the world's greatest solicitors who own a Parking trade association, Gladstones

(or BW legal, the worlds second greatest soliciotors who dont own a parking trade association)

then come back here pronto.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PCN #1

 

1 Date of the infringement

 

1/6/2017

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

 

21/6/2017

 

3 Date received

 

24/6/2017

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?]

 

No

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

 

Not that I am aware of. It was an ANPR system?

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up you appeal]

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

 

Hi,

 

In reference to your letter dated 21st June 2017, I would like to contest this parking charge.

 

Myself and my wife use the Betteshanger Park and always pay as you will see if you look back at your records.

 

We remember this day as we put our debit card in the machine and we believed that the payment had gone through as there was a long delay. We even spoke to another couple who were waiting at the machine who said they had also had problems with it in the past.

 

We believed that the payment had been taken and left. We certainly didn't want to make multiple attempts and be charged.

 

I am more than happy to pay the usual fee, but feel that this charge is unjustified.

 

Like I say, if you go back on your records you will see that we do usually pay. My wife and I usually go walking at Betteshanger early in the morning and are usually there only for around 30 minutes or so. So to risk a fine for the sake of saving £1 or so would be stupid.

 

Please consider this request and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Upon entering the site you entered into a contract to pay for the parking that was due at the time or up to 48 hours following your departure (online) or pay a parking charge notice (reduced if paid within 14 days).

 

Having checked all the payments made during you visit I am unable to see a payment for your registration or anything I might assume is an incorrect entry of your registration, therefore the parking charge has been issued correctly.

 

You can pay your parking charge notice online at www.parkwithease.co.uk or by sending a cheque or postal order to Park with Ease Ltd, Unit 14, Theatre Court, London Road, Northwich, Cheshire, CW9 5HB. We also accept payments over the telephone on the contact number below.

 

The Independent Appeals Service (www.theIAS.org) provides an Alternative Dispute Resolution scheme for disputes of this type. As you have complied with our internal appeals procedure you may use, and we will engage with, the IAS Standard Appeals Service providing you lodge an appeal to them within 21 days of this rejection.

 

If you believe this decision is incorrect, you are entitled to appeal to the Independent Appeals Service (IAS). In order to appeal the IAS will need your parking charge number, your vehicle registration and the date the charge was originally issued.

 

Kind Regards

 

Gemma

Customer Services

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Hi,

 

Under the 14 day rule for the Notice to Keeper, you should have sent the demand within 14 days of the event, which you clearly have not done.

 

I note the protection of freedoms act 2012 schedule 4 section 9 states that for keeper liability to apply the keeper must receive a notice to keeper within 14 days.

 

REF PWE

- Period of Parking: 5th June 2017 - Your letter is dated 21st June 2017 - Received 26th of June 2017

REF PWE

- Period of Parking: 1st June 2017 - Your letter is dated 21st June 2017 - Received 24th of June 2017.

 

Note that both were received well outside of the 14 day period and means that you are no longer able to pursue the registered keeper of the vehicle (Mrs XXXXX) for this fine/penalty. You must instead pursue the driver of the vehicle at the time.

 

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

 

If you would like to take this further I can put this in writing to you.

 

Note that I will also

 

1. Make a formal complaint to the IPC

2. Make a formal complaint to the DVLA as I believe that you obtained our information outside of the 14 day period.

3. Open an appeal with the IAS.

 

I await your response.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

We have not claimed to and are not seeking to use POFA 2012 to pursue the matter, therefore we have no requirement to issue any letters within 14 days.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Gemma

Customer Services

 

7 Who is the parking company?

 

Parking With Ease

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

 

Betteshanger Country Park, Deal, Kent

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

 

IAS

 

PCN #2

 

1 Date of the infringement

 

5/6/2017

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

 

21/6/2017

 

3 Date received

 

26/6/2017

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?]

 

No

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

 

Not that I am aware of. It was an ANPR system?

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up you appeal]

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

 

#### As PCN #1 ####

 

Hi,

 

In reference to your letter dated 21st June 2017, I would like to contest this parking charge.

 

Myself and my wife use the Betteshanger Park and always pay as you will see if you look back at your records.

 

We remember this day as we put our debit card in the machine and we believed that the payment had gone through as there was a long delay. We even spoke to another couple who were waiting at the machine who said they had also had problems with it in the past.

 

We believed that the payment had been taken and left. We certainly didn't want to make multiple attempts and be charged.

 

I am more than happy to pay the usual fee, but feel that this charge is unjustified.

 

Like I say, if you go back on your records you will see that we do usually pay. My wife and I usually go walking at Betteshanger early in the morning and are usually there only for around 30 minutes or so. So to risk a fine for the sake of saving £1 or so would be stupid.

 

Please consider this request and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Upon entering the site you entered into a contract to pay for the parking that was due at the time or up to 48 hours following your departure (online) or pay a parking charge notice (reduced if paid within 14 days).

 

Having checked all the payments made during you visit I am unable to see a payment for your registration or anything I might assume is an incorrect entry of your registration, therefore the parking charge has been issued correctly.

 

You can pay your parking charge notice online at www.parkwithease.co.uk or by sending a cheque or postal order to Park with Ease Ltd, Unit 14, Theatre Court, London Road, Northwich, Cheshire, CW9 5HB. We also accept payments over the telephone on the contact number below.

 

The Independent Appeals Service (www.theIAS.org) provides an Alternative Dispute Resolution scheme for disputes of this type. As you have complied with our internal appeals procedure you may use, and we will engage with, the IAS Standard Appeals Service providing you lodge an appeal to them within 21 days of this rejection.

 

If you believe this decision is incorrect, you are entitled to appeal to the Independent Appeals Service (IAS). In order to appeal the IAS will need your parking charge number, your vehicle registration and the date the charge was originally issued.

 

Kind Regards

 

Gemma

Customer Services

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Hi,

 

Under the 14 day rule for the Notice to Keeper, you should have sent the demand within 14 days of the event, which you clearly have not done.

 

I note the protection of freedoms act 2012 schedule 4 section 9 states that for keeper liability to apply the keeper must receive a notice to keeper within 14 days.

 

REF PWE

- Period of Parking: 5th June 2017 - Your letter is dated 21st June 2017 - Received 26th of June 2017

REF PWE

- Period of Parking: 1st June 2017 - Your letter is dated 21st June 2017 - Received 24th of June 2017.

 

Note that both were received well outside of the 14 day period and means that you are no longer able to pursue the registered keeper of the vehicle (Mrs XXXXX) for this fine/penalty. You must instead pursue the driver of the vehicle at the time.

 

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

 

If you would like to take this further I can put this in writing to you.

 

Note that I will also

 

1. Make a formal complaint to the IPC

2. Make a formal complaint to the DVLA as I believe that you obtained our information outside of the 14 day period.

3. Open an appeal with the IAS.

 

I await your response.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

We have not claimed to and are not seeking to use POFA 2012 to pursue the matter, therefore we have no requirement to issue any letters within 14 days.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Gemma

Customer Services

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

7 Who is the parking company?

 

Parking With Ease

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

 

Betteshanger Country Park, Deal, Kent

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

 

IAS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, was any payment taken from the card?

If so first thing to do is do a chargeback via the card issuer (bank).

They cant have it both ways

 

Minus side is you named both of the people in the vehicle so they may well sue your wife as the driver at the time and without another defence you will be stuffed.

 

The good news is ther is at least 2 other defences,

firstly is performance of contract and the second one is they probably dont have the authority they claim anyway so if it is local to you get back there and photograph the signage at the site and we will help you pick it apart

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...