Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

unknown CCJ by Cabot for old MBNA Virgin Money Card - set aside ok - Now what?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2574 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning, folks.

 

I'm in a particularly odd and confusing situation so any assistance in clarifying where exactly I stand would be greatly appreciated.

 

In 2010 I took out a credit card with Virgin Money.

In 2012 I defaulted on this due to financial difficulty and depression.

I do not remember receiving a default notice from Virgin Money.

It's possible I received a default notice from MBNA, but I closed an account with them in 2006 (I have the letter) so would have discounted it.

In January of 2017 I found out a CCJ was registered against me with Hillesden Securities as the claimant. I did not receive any correspondence prior to it being registered, as I was not living at the address the CCJ is registered at.

 

As soon as I found out about the CCJ (through a mortgage adviser telling me!) I attempted to contact Hillesden. This led me to DLC, which led me to Cabot, which led me to Mortimer Clarke. I spoke to a representative of theirs on the phone, explained the situation and asked if the judgement could be set aside. They said no, and that the best I could do was satisfy the CCJ.

 

After some digging online I sent an N244 to my local court and received a hearing date. Mortimer Clarke did not show, the judge decided they hadn't been very helpful, and duly set aside the judgement. Happy days.

 

This was earlier this month. Today I found a letter sent from Mortimer Clarke 4 days before the hearing, with the claimant now being ME III Ltd. The letter states they agree to the setting aside but that a full defense should be submitted within 21 days. They attached a draft order, assuming that the judge would made this order. She didn't.

 

What happens now? Given that the draft order was not formalised, I'm assuming I do not have to submit any further defense (which I already submitted in full as part of the N244). And what are Mortimer Clarke likely to do when they receive the actual order from the court?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check with your court to see if the draft order is legit.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have good reason to believe it's not given that the judge has issued an order and I have received no other order. A draft order first has to become an order by being signed off by a judge, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing they've lost.

 

 

you don't pay any attention to stupid letters the claimant sends demanding this or that of you

[not them under one of their many alternative group names - its all the same lot]

 

 

and you should NEVER EVER ring any of them and speak on the phone

 

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay,

well I was just trying to do the right thing at the time

- I do owe the money but I didn't deserve a CCJ.

 

 

I'm not trying to avoid paying the debt,

I just want fair opportunity to agree payment terms with the creditor without a court getting involved unnecessarily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have good reason to believe it's not given that the judge has issued an order and I have received no other order. A draft order first has to become an order by being signed off by a judge, right?

 

Safer to ring and enquire...rather than assume......is the draft order stamped and franked from the court or is just a draft from the claimant?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Safer to ring and enquire...rather than assume......is the draft order stamped and franked from the court or is just a draft from the claimant?

 

The latter. It was postmarked 4 days prior to the hearing and the judge did not have it during the 5 minutes the hearing lasted. Her order was simple - the judgement is set aside. Had she been able to refer to the draft a discussion would have discussed it. But I certainly could check.

Edited by JonnyJonJon
Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us all about the debt first

before you blindly go pay a debt buyer..

who says is even owed or enforceable.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would for the sake of a quick phone call it may have been submitted again since the hearing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us all about the debt first

before you blindly go pay a debt buyer..

who says is even owed or enforceable.

 

Fair enough. I mentioned in my first post most of the details and what I do know is only what I found out from a) checking online and b) speaking to the Mortimer Clarke (who have been phoning me but there's no way I'm speaking to them now if they told me the judgement wouldn't be set aside when the court decided it would be. They've been misleading at best and I know courts don't take favourably to that).

 

So:

 

- Found out I had a CCJ registered at an address I wasn't living at and in the name of a company I didn't recognise (Hillesden Securities)

- Ended up speaking to Mortimer Clarke who told me it was an MBNA debt. I told them I paid this off in 2006. They told me this one was from July 2012 and I said I didn't have a credit card with MBNA.

- They told me it was originally with Virgin Money. I did have a card with this organisation. Credit limit was £1,800, closing balance was £2,096, CCJ says £2,303.

- I was unaware of MBNA's involvement as a creditor.

- I was unaware of the debt being resold to Hillesden, DLC, Cabot, ME III or any of the companies involved.

- I have received one letter from Mortimer Clarke, which was their response to my N244.

 

Anything else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok go do as Andy said ring northants bulk and findout the state now.

 

then i'd be inclined to go ring MBNA

you have the 16 digit card number?

ask when the last payment was made.

 

and if they have any records of you paying it off.

 

you wouldn't have gotten any of the paperwork prior to the claim

as you didnt inform your creditors of your move.

lucky you got the set aside too!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...