Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
    • Dave, You're probably thinking along the same lines as me. The NTK says "The reason for issuing the charge notice is: Parking longer than allowed" From memory, I think one of their stupid rules is that if 'Bucks is closed, you're not allowed to park at all.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Contractual Interest and Natwest?


lil_jo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6391 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

 

Just wondering whether anyone had had any luck in claiming back their charges with contractural interest?

 

I'm based in Scotland but bank with Natwest, i've decided to claim contractural interest at 8% instead of the standard 8% if it goes to court ... reason being that i'll hopefully get the interest even if they settle before the court date.

 

Would claiming the contractural interest make them more determined to challenge in court? or would they act as they have been acting and pull out at the 11th hour?

 

Charges and interest total £2200, so i'm deciding at the moment whether to pursue throu the small claims (max £750) several times, or through a summary action (max £1500) with an additional small claims action.

 

Thoughts on this would be appreciated!!

 

lil_jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just put in a claim against NW claiming contractual rate interest. What I have done is claim at 3 rates as alternatives on the basis that if the implied contractual rate argument fails I can still fall back on the County Courts Act 8% rate.

 

In the POC I've made the argument about reciprocity and mutuality and claimed "Interest at 29.69% per annum as the implied contractual unauthorised lending rate on the charges debited to the Account in the sum of £XXXand continuing at the daily rate of £XXX until judgment or sooner payment or in the alternative interest at 18.86% per annum as the implied contractual authorised lending rate on the charges debited to the Account in the sum of £XXX and continuing at the daily rate of £XXX until judgment or sooner payment or in the alternative interest at 8% per annum pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 on the charges debited to the Account in the sum of £XXX and continuing at the daily rate of £XXX until judgment or sooner payment". (The above is English law - don't know if it applies to your contract with the bank).

 

The 2 rates above were NW's Effective Annual rates for unauthorised and authorised lending at the date the claim was written. Since we're having to take them to court I'd call their "borrowing" (some on this site would call it thieving!!) unauthorised to say the least. I've used the highest interest figure for the Form N1 front page.

 

Why are you claiming 8% as contractual interest? Why not go for the rates the bank charge us?

 

If the bank wish to challenge this they will have to go to court on the bank charges issue as well, something they are extremely reluctant to do. The way I look at it is that contractual interest is a legitimate legal argument. The banks would attempt to settle early if they had any commercial nous.

 

The banks can either make a serious and realistic offer earlier (not an offer to pay half or they'll get a f@@@ off letter in reply) or make us wait a bit and pay a lot of interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pete

 

Thanks for your reply, I decided to claim contractural interest as a way a re-couping some i've the interest i've paid to the banks on their "unarranged erm .... borrowing???" on my account. I was tempted to go for the higher rate but felt that i was getting a little out of my depth and didn't want to risk having my claim knocked back if it reached court. This way, if it reaches the court stage, i will argue that i would have been entitled to use a higher contractural rate and therefore the contractural rate i am charging is fair and reasonable (and i'm chicken lol). If they settle before going to court, i'll get the interest and the charges instead of just the charges. If they settle out of court and i hadn't claimed contractural, i wouldn't have been entitled to any interest at all.

 

Do you mind if i use the wording on your last post for my POC too? was getting worried as to how i would word it lol

 

Thanks again

 

lil_jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably best to use the template provided for your poc, but obviously edit it according to your claim. These templates have been used in other successful claims so we know they work!! ;)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear deller1,

 

I've looked at the template you put the link to and unless I've completely misread it (in which case apologies in advance) it only seems to give the wording for the County Court rate interest. I looked for wording to put the contractual rate interest argument forward but couldn't find any on the official templates. I did however find an excellent post by a menber called rbrears and I used that wording as the basis of my PC's. I didn't use MCOL because I don't believe it gives enough space to put the necessary legal points forward. The link to that post is http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/15172-reply-stock-defence-18-a.html

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...