Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! MCE Insurance not paying out after rejecting first offer.


Lionheart.RW
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

I found this forum after a quick Google and ended up reading into some of the insurance nightmares on here. It seems these big companies prey on the vulnerable and hope you roll over and play dead while they take your money and accuse you for being unlawluff. Their tactics are dirty and un-excusable! My Grandpa always used to say "The bigger the money, The bigger the fiddle". It seems iv found myself in such a dylema!

 

Recently I had my beloved original PX 125 Vespa Scooter (Douglas) 1987 Stolen. I paid £1500 for it and only had it for about 12 months.

 

The bike was found and recovered from some local yobs who had tottally detroyed it. They had spraypainted it Black (from white) and broke most of the exterior I assume through hotwiring it and giving it a good jor ride. The Scooter was recovered by the insurance company and apparently scrapped.

 

Weeks passed and they didnt even contact me, after a few weeks I contacted them to find out what was happenening and they just fobbed me off saying the guy who was dealing with my claim was on holiday and he would be in contact when he returned. I left it a few days again with no response I contacted them to hear the same crap that the guy who was dealing with my claim on this occasion was "NOW OF ILL"!!

 

Im sure you can imagine at this stage I started to get slightly aggrevated. About 7 weeks had passed and I they couldnt even give me a curticy call to update me on my claim. Eventually I managed to contact the guy dealing with my claim and after 2+ months I finnally recieved an offer of £850 with an excess deduction of £250 resulting in me only getting £600 for a scooter I paid £1500. Not to mention I only drove the thing twice since purchasing it!!!

 

The thing is I bought this scooter cheap and they are selling on ebay and other websites in excess of £2000 so I dont understand at all how they valuated the scooter at £850. Iv never had to make a claim before and have been a long standing customer of MCE for years and I wasnt happy with their offer.

 

In turn I decided to send them an email of three screenshots of three scooters that where identical to mine that had sold on ebay recently. This would then give them an idication on how much they where going for and hopefully persuade them to re-evaluate there offer. BUT OHHH NOOOO!

 

Out of the three pictures I sent them 2 had sold for over £2000 and one had sold for £1550.... After a couple of days after sending the email I recieved a phone call from the guy dealing with my claim he continued to tell me that because In the email that I sent him I stated that the vespa's where "Exactly Identical" to mine they where marking my insurance void and revoking my offer and closing my case.

 

Apparently in the description of one of the Vespas I had sent him from ebay it stated that that particular vesper had an upgrade kit on it making it faster than a 125cc and because I stated they where identical they have conveniently assumed mine also had an upgrade kit on it also and in turn nullifying my insurance because I didnt declare it.

 

I proceeded to tell the gentleman that my scooter certainly did not have an upgrade kit on it and I obviously over looked one of the photos I had sent him. He simply continued to tell me there was nothing he could do and that my insurance void.

 

And thats pretty much how our conversation Ended.

 

Ive recently recieved some bad news regarding my health and at the time of the phone call I wasnt in the right frame of mind to try and defend myself resulting in me ending the conversation. I told them I would be back in touch to discuss further at a later date.

 

 

I know I shouldnt have stated that all the three scooters where "Exactly" identical to mine because they where not. I have obviously chosen a poor sequence of words that they have picked up on and they have penialized me for it. As I mentioned the email I sent was just a guidline to show them the current market value of the bike.

 

Surely theres something I can do??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you certainly should have taken more care when trying to compare your bike to others. However, they should be much more sensible and open to dealing with errors.

 

Secondly, I completely agree with you that you are entitled to the replacement value. I don't think eBay was a good place to go. I think you should be getting comparisons from proper dealers who are selling those scooters at the full replacement value.

Secondly, I would have another telephone conversation with them but this time read our customer services guide first and then implement the advice there. I think that the things that you are being told over the phone are nonsense and will be extremely helpful to you later on when you come to make a complaint.

 

Once you have done that and you have got your comparative material, come back here and we will explain to you the best way to make a serious complaint which hopefully will get the matter resolved.

If I were you I would begin by going through all the bike magazines and dealer websites and getting your information and your comparative material from there.

 

Incidentally, this is not the first time that we have had reports about MCE insurance making arbitrary and peremptory – and in my view unlawful – cancellation of insurance policies. It is an extremely serious thing to do and they need to be stopped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disgusting behaviour by MCE and you should send a recorded delivery letter to the CEO of MCE with full details of your complaint.

 

They should have offered you the current replacement value for the scooter and on receiving your complaint should have explained the process properly for negotiating a higher value. Surely there are Vespa or other Scooter specialists who could have confirmed in writing what the replacement value was. Not sure Ebay ads with details that are different to your Scooter were helpful.

 

Then cancelling the Insurance due to some misunderstanding about Ebay adverts is very silly.

 

You could go to the FOS, but that would take time and you need to give MCE opportunity to resolve first. Taking MCE to court would also not be quick and you have to always try to resolve first, before involving the courts.

 

Have a look at ICOBS which are the FCA rules applying to Insurers and also Treating Customers faiirly, also FCA. MCE have not complied with ICOBS in regard to clarity of communications and handling your claim fairly, not using technical issues to avoid a claim and cancel the policy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree completely with the advice given above except the rather than write to the CEO (who will get this kind of stuff all the time), you should write to Amy Shilton who is there compliance officer. She is the one who is responsible for making sure that the company meets its statutory obligations under the DPA and also under ICOBS et cetera.

 

She will very rarely have any direct contact with customers and so a message addressed directly to her will attract attention

Amy Shilton

Compliance Team Manager

[email protected]

 

Secondly, before you do any of this kind of thing, I would make sure that I gather the information I suggested in my first post – comparative material and also a recording of any silliness that is said to you by their customer service people over the telephone. If you had a recording of the kind of dismissive attitude which you apparently have been confronted with in your first phone call, then I'm quite sure that Amy Shilton would have something to say about it.

 

I think that it is very important to be fully prepared in terms of having all your comparative material ready and also evidence of any incriminating conversations so that when you make your complaint, it is compelling and also potentially embarrassing for them. Preparation is everything.

 

I would also be seeking a modest figure in compensation for their attempt to cancel the policy. About £150 feels about right

 

 

I suspect that she must know what MCE's legal duties are, even if the rest of them don't.

 

Don't worry, I'm pretty certain you will get your replacement value as long as you follow the advice we give you here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello 👋

 

Thank you so much for your very helpful advise!

 

I tottally agree with you and will definetly do my research as you have suggested. If i'm being honest I think I underestimated their power and in the same likness I expected them to take some action from my simple email. How wrong I was.

 

I guess I need to get some more official examples and start to formulate a more in depth complaint highlighting my unprofessional experience.

 

Ill read up on the customer services guide etc and keep you posted on my next move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mention the bike has been scrapped, if this is the case and they have done this without your permission, this is a massive no no in the eyes of the FOS.

 

This could be a huge bargaining tool for you.

 

I'm not sure if MCE are just a broker, if so, your complaint may be wasted by going to them when you should be going to the underwriter direct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mention the bike has been scrapped, if this is the case and they have done this without your permission, this is a massive no no in the eyes of the FOS.

 

Well spotted. This passed me by.

 

Were you consulted about the scrapping of this bike?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a load of rubbish and of course it is more evidence of unfair treatment. Luckily, because you followed the advice in my first post, read our customer services guide and implemented the advice there, you got a complete recording of this phone call which we can then use against them. Well done

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked for it back and they said "By law, if any of the bodywork is damaged they have to scrap them"?!

 

I take it thats a load of cods wollop?

Yes and no, theyhave a duty to deal as per the abi agreements that if a vehicle is deemed uneconomic, structurally dangerous, burnt our, stolen it is placed on the MIAFTR register.

 

This does not mean they can scrap your bikewithout your permission. They can settle in full and have assumed permission, but even then they are chancing it. Even though it may say they will dispose of it in the policy they have no legal right to do that without you're permission.

 

The FOS really dislike insurers doing this and will award compensation of around £500 for it.

 

Put this together with any premium refund (it'll be full if they void) plus interest at 8% pa, a £550 (not 100% sure, I rarely work with insurers these days) FOS fee, the salvage cost (and one of the lamest excuses ever to repudiate a claim, they would bad nuts not to settle this.

 

Go at them all guns blazing, tell them not only is their repudiation ridiculous, you having given them permission to dispose of the bike. They should squirm.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...