Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JD Williams and Lowell - advice please?


cgb1701
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2761 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I seem to be in quite the similar situation to OP.

 

I received a letter from Lowell around a month ago and called to speak to them.

My account claiming I owe £323.33 for an account opened in 2009.

 

There are regular purchases and pay offs over the next 12 months and then didn't use them for a long time.

In 2012 I then logged into my account to make another purchase and suddenly noticed a huge balance,

not knowing any better I paid of some of the balance, covering the cost of the goods but was arguing about all the charges.

 

IIRC they actually dropped some of the charges at the time as they couldn't provide me with anything that said I agreed to them.

 

Around the middle of 2012 I remember getting a phone call from a debt collection agency who said I owed, at that time, about £200 to Premier Man.

 

I again said I was happy to pay it if someone could show me what or where I had agreed to those charges.

I think I got a generic copy of the T&C but they were dated as 2012 and they couldn't provide me with T&C from when I signed up.

 

I've not used premier man since and I've moved house three times since then but

last month got a letter from Lowells saying I owed £323.

 

I dont have that kind of cash so I called them and spoke to them.

I explained the above, Premier Man couldn't provide me any details,

the other agency couldn't provide me any details

but if Lowell could provide me details I'd gladly pay it.

 

At that point the girl on the phone said if I paid her £150 there and then they would wipe off the debt completely.

Had it been right after payday I might have done it but, again, I dont have that kind of cash laying around.

I told her the same thing, get me a copy of the T&C, something showing I'd agreed to them and what the charges are.

 

Yesterday they've sent me a second letter saying my account is on hold until Premier Man provide my Credit Agreement but have provided a copy of my statement dating back to 2009

if I would like to get in touch to "propose affordable payments".

 

 

T he last transaction where I bought actual goods was in 2013,

more than 30 charges of £12 "admin fee" and some months

- january and february 2013 for example

- I've been charged the admin fee twice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop talking to fleecing DCA's on the phone

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS

and have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi All,

 

I was just wondering if I could get some advice.

 

in April this year I received a letter from Lowell requesting £323 for debt to JD Williams.

 

Some history

- JD williams (premier man) first contacted me about 3 years ago saying I had out standing debt,

at the time I asked them to send me a statement and a copy of my agreement where I agreed to the £12 administration charges on my account.

They could not provide them and I never heard from them again.

 

About 2 years ago I heard from another debt collection agency with the same thing,

again I asked for a copy of my statement and the agreement - I never heard from them again.

 

Around April this year I heard from Lowell, who had bought the debt from JD Williams and were seeking payment.

I informed them I had had this conversation with JD Williams and the other debt agency several years ago and neither of them could provide me with any proof why I owed this money.

 

Lowell have now provided my account statement but have been told by JD williams that I signed up too long ago and they no longer have a copy of the agreement I would have agreed to.

 

Looking at the actual statement it starts in Sept 2009 but there are already charges on it so I assume my account was older than that.

 

Back when JD Williams first contacted me about the outstanding payments my question to them was what the administration charges were for, some months there are two lots of charges, some months one charge, some month no charges.

For example, between September 2010 and Sept 2011 - there are 12 admin charges despite making 5 payments of over the minimum required.

 

The last goods I bought were in March 2013, the first in over six months, which is when I noticed all the addition charges and interest and got in touch with them.

 

 

At that time, I believe, we agreed to a partial payment to cover goods and interest and I paid £102 in August 2013 and I never heard from them again after that, until the debt collectors started calling.

 

Lowell today acknowledged that the admin charges do look strange and dont make sense and that there are some double charges that they will take off and reduce it to £170.

 

As far as I can work out from the statement:

Opening ballance of -£44 at the start of the statement in 2009

between 2009 and 2014

 

£483.87 worth of goods and postage

£193.45 worth of interest charges

£564 worth of administration charges.

I've paid £859.16 over the years

 

Leaving balance of £338

 

My argument is

I've paid for all the goods, postage and interest and all the pre-2013 late charges (plus a bit more) when I spoke to premier man back in 2013.

 

 

The remaining balance is administration charges and interest on those charges that they can't provide any evidence for me agreeing to or a copy of the T&C I would have agreed.

 

 

I hope all this made sense.

 

 

Any advice for what to tell Lowell when they call back would be appreciated.

 

 

I really dont have £300+ to pay for some shirts I bought 4 years ago!

 

 

Although I'm sure many of us are in the same boat.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop talking to fleecing DCAlink3.gif's on the phone !!

 

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS

and have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

 

 

send lowells a CCA request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And set about reclaiming all these "admin" charges aswell plus interest at the rate you were paying.

You can d/l a CIsheet from here(just click it and read all the posts).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...