Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/? Claimform - old JDW CAT debt prob sb'd


leonmc7878
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2766 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There

 

Thanks for all the help I have had from people in the past just reading these forums

- this kind of thing is why the internet was invented.

 

 

I have now a personal plea for help if you people would be so kind, I think this is the right format:

 

Name of the Claimant ? LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD

Date of issue – 13 OCT 2016

What is the claim for –

 

1. the defendant entered into a consumer creditic act 1974 regulated agreement with JD Williams *********( the agreement)

 

2. the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

 

3. the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on the 31/03/2014 and notice given to defendant.

 

4. despite repeated request for payment the sum of £1430.00 remains due and outstanding

 

And the claimant claims

a) the said sum £1430.00

b) interest pursuant to s69 county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.313, but limited to one year, being £114.40

c) Costs

 

What is the value of the claim?£1544.40

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? CATALOGUE CREDIT ACCOUNT

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? NOT 100% AS ITS DROPPED OFF CREDIT FILE ALSO

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. IT WAS ASSIGNED TO LOWELLS

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NOT SURE - A BITTER DIVORCE ENSUED

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? NOT SURE - AGAIN I WAS OUT OF THE HOME

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? NOT SURE - SAW A NUMBER OF LETTERS TO MY PARENTS HOME IN THE LAST 6/8 MONTHS AS IT HAS BEEN ABOUT TO DROP OF MY FILE

Why did you cease payments? MOVED HOUSE THROUGH A BITTER DIVORCE AND ASSUMED EX WAS TAKING CARE (stupidly)

What was the date of your last payment? THE DEFAULT WAS ISSUED JULY 2010 SO BEFORE THIS DATE

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? NO

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the,agreement was in your name?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like its sb'd yes

Go ring JDW and ask last payment or order date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MAte

 

thanks again for replying and taking time out - I really appreciate this.

 

I have just spoken to a lovely lady at JDW who has given me the information below:

 

Last order 26/06/2009

 

Last payment was prior to 22/09/2009 (they dont keep details after 6 years she told me so this is as far back as it goes on their system)

 

There is an entry of 07/06/2010 for this being sold to a debt collection agency

 

Does this info help at all ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great work!!

 

Go up on mcol website

Acknowledge the claim

Defend all

Leave jurisdiction unticked

 

You can Also file the SB defence in post 3 here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?469733-Arrow-Restons-M-S-card-statute-barred(2-Viewing)-nbsp&p=4964155#post4964155

 

Job done

 

Nothing more to do

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, you are amazing.

 

I have tried to register on that MCOL but it keeps giving me an error - when I enter my details of name and address, it has given me a GG number

 

is there nay other advice ?

Edited by leonmc7878
Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the claim form

 

Moneyclaimonline

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great work!!

 

Go up on mcol website

Acknowledge the claim

Defend all

Leave jurisdiction unticked

 

Job done

 

Nothing more to do

 

Hi Really sorry to mither - I have managed to log on now but it says about 14 days and it was issued on 13th October - so this falls outside that - do I need to "Start AOS" or am I still OK to "Start Defence"

 

Sorry - pain again.

 

I am on a page that says state your defence in a maximum of 122 lines - what should I place in this box please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - pain again.

 

I am on a page that says state your defence in a maximum of 122 lines - what should I place in this box please

 

As per DX's advice above - if you click on the link he provided, you'll find this in post #3:

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980.

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

 

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC] or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

This is your statute barred defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah sorry - so I engaged my brain and read the posts in full and have managed to do that.

 

I am really sorry that I had to keep asking questions I was just very nervous and worried about it all.

 

Many Thanks to dx100UK and shamrocker for your patience.

 

Do I need to wait to do anything now ? if there is a thread or advice on this already tell me what I should read.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you managed to do both OK

 

Nothing to do bar read threads in this forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you managed to do both OK

 

Nothing to do bar read threads in this forum

 

Hi There

 

Sorry to be an idiot, but now I have done that entry - how will i know that its been cancelled and no ore action will be taken by them or the courts ?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not been cancelled...the claimant has 33 days to consider your defences and decide if they wish to proceed (challenge them) if they do not respond within the 33 days the claims will be stayed (paused) not cancelled.

 

See what transpires.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...