Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift after repo on £30k debt of which +£12k is charges +£2k is PPI!!


sofi335311
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

here are the WS exhibits but they are hidden as there is far too much to redact tonight

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 218
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

What help do you need sofi?

 

I posted the beginnings of a WS for you.

 

All you need to do is tell your story in it,

in a paragrahed fashion and throughout the WS,

 

 

you refer to any exhibits you wish to include,

such as statements, MCOB 12.5 (excessive charges) etc and rebutt any paragraphs from the claimants WS.

 

Because only you know the full sequence of events,

its not really something we can do for you,

other than to check it over when you post it to thread.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/standard-directions/general/witness-statements

 

This would be your basic format with your fleshed out bits inserted and each part numbered etc

 

Hit the link in the quote above

 

Look at Swift WS to see how one is written.

 

Paragraph your WS and reference any docs you will rely on as exhibits.

 

Rebutt anything you disagree with in Swifts WS by referencing the relevant paragragh and stating why you disagree with it.

 

The whole WS statement should then tell your story and challenge whats in Swifts WS

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hit the link in the quote above

 

Look at Swift WS to see how one is written.

 

Paragraph your WS and reference any docs you will rely on as exhibits.

 

Rebutt anything you disagree with in Swifts WS by referencing the relevant paragragh and stating why you disagree with it.

 

The whole WS statement should then tell your story and challenge whats in Swifts WS

 

thank you Martin

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Did you serve your WS sofi?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you serve your WS sofi?

 

No Martin

 

i put an application in for a N244 requesting a stay of proceedings and stating out my reasons for that

 

actually my mom died on 23rd october so i wasnt in a fit state of mind to do anything.

i also sent for an SAR but have not heard anything as of yet

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR to Swift?

Cant see why you might need that, you already have all the statements unless there is other stuff like default notices, call logs etc you think you might need?

 

Im assuming you havent heard if the case was stayed as per your n244?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i have not heard if i was granted a stay in proceedings as it was only submitted yesterday which is why i meed to attend tomorrow

 

as for the SAR i have been advised to get further info such as if they paid commission and " Override" commission and they didn't tell you how much both were they will be in trouble.

In fact ask them now ASAP if they paid commission and Over ride commission to Crystal Finance.

 

You could do it all by sending Swift an SAR..........that is another way you can ask the court to stay the hearing next week as your SAR info will provide you with more evidence to fight them with and give the Court further insight into all matters

 

theres lots of other things Martin such as they increased the interest rate 3 times when actually LIBOR from Dec 2006 to August 2007 yet they increased my interest on 20th Feb 2007 then...

 

........ from November 2007 LIBOR went down and down from 5.49% to 2.81% to September 2008.

 

they increased your interest on 20th August 2007 then on 22 December 2008 they increased it again even though they had not reduced it at any time when it was going down,

 

they increased it as soon as it went up again even though LIBOR was at least 2% lower that when your agreement started.

 

by getting an SAR i will know more about my account apart from fees and charges

 

We have absolute evidence and confirmation from the OFT that Swift did not include Eastern Counselling in their CC licence from 2004, and as they have used it since that is deemed to be a criminal offence under section 39 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and its subsequent amendments 2006.

 

A claim can neither be pursued or defended against the background of an illegal act under the Doctrine of the Illegal Defence.

 

Exactly and by doing so they committed a criminal offence......

.....Swift Advances Plc used Eastern Counselling to levy the fees and charge who then added them to your account .....

..Unlawfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

great work!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Superb stuff Sofi and best of luck tomorrow, hope all goes well.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Sofi! You have been busy:-D I'm pleased you took a big breath and allowed yourself more time. Wishing a positive hearing for you tomorrow.

 

thank you Determindator

 

Had a lot of guidance and help and hopefully it should do the trick

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE ON COURT HEARING

 

THE JUDGE HAS ORDERED

 

1. By no later than 4pm on 27 January 2017 i the defendant must if they intend to defend claim further file/serve a defence and if appropriate counterclaim setting out clearly the charges which they dispute together with reasons and clarification of the legal basis for the dispute

 

2. No later than 4pm on 10th February 2017 the claimant shall if so adviced file/serve a response to counterclaim

 

3. Possession hearing date adjourned to 20 February 2017 ( if the issues between both parties cannot be determined then the hearing may be used to give directions

 

Sofi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...