Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

work ethics


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI,

i started working for a company

i was hired as a Instructor Examiner to deliver Reach and Counter balance fork lift truck.

 

 

at the interview i was told about the SUD (Safe Urban Driving) course and asked if i would be interested in learning the skill so as to deliver the course for the company.

 

 

i was also told that there would be a wage rise for each new course that i could teach.

up to a maximum of £25.000.00 P/Y.

 

 

8 months down the line i was asked by the office staff i could run a Scissor lift course

i said yes. and told her that my certificate was on file.

i then went on to deliver that course.

 

 

Two weeks later the same thing except it was for the POET truck, again i could run the course .

i then run a POET truck course,

 

 

i asked for a wage rise to compensate for the new courses i know i would be running them again.

i was told that i would get a wage increase for the SUD course, but not for the Scissor lift or POET truck.

 

 

i said the best thing is that i dont run the two courses as im not being paid for the new skills..

They replied with..

Following your comments regarding the type of work that you want to be deployed on as an employed salaried instructor for The company ,

 

 

we feel it is important to highlight the key points below:

· All salaried instructors are employed on National Contracts

· Skills sets are deemed as FLT, LGV, ALLMI, SUD, First Aid, Group DCPC etc.

 

Most of our employed and subcontract instructors deliver a range of MHE courses under ITSSAR with others that only hold RTITB delivering under that accreditation.

 

In addition to this various in-house certified courses such as Banksman are delivered by most of our instructors.

 

To fulfil our commitments to customer requirements we cannot accept instructors dictating which type of training courses they will deliver on behalf of xxx.

You are still required therefore to deliver the range of courses you are deployed on.

 

To reiterate as in my previous email we have a commitment to upskill you to ensure a DQC is achieved by the end of 2016 and this in financial terms is substantial.

 

After reflection on the points raised we would hope that you understand and accept your responsibilities.

 

Whilst I await your acknowledgement of this email I have requested Rosie to ignore your email to her in relation to your desired course selection..

 

 

.. im not sure but i dont think they can force me to use my own personal skills for free,

 

 

Any advice is welcome.

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how long have you worked there, are you permanent staff or sub contracted, and what do you have in writing about pay rises?

 

they can't force you to do anything, but you may find there is suddenly little work for you, with a resultant layoff.

 

are you in a union?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, Thank you

. i started working for this company in December 2015 when i did the SUD course for them,

i am permanent full time staff. I do have a contract which says ..your salary will be reviewed annually and may be increased from time to time at the company'e discretion without affecting the other terms of your employment. there is no obligation to award an increase.

there is no union here.

the hole conversation was done by email, so i have proof of what he is saying,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly none of that helps your case.

 

If it is discretionary in the contract, I think you would be hard pushed to make demands. To be bloody minded they could make your pay rise a pound per new course.

 

I'd say their response makes the position pretty clear. Also, with less than 2 years employment, they can let you go for any reason not related to a protected characteristic.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are busy doing courses on say scissor lifts then you are not available to run courses on fork lifts. Unless they expect you to work extra time or do preparation work in your own time I see it as the compnay can utilise those skills you have within the time you are employed. their choice really, there are a limited number of hours in a day so where they gain in one area they lose in another. If you are under time pressures then you should dicuss this and force the company to make a decision on priorities but other than that be grateful they value you expertise.

However, if the going rate for instructors for the differing types of equipment is vastly different then you should consider what benchmark they use regards salary for the highest paid instructor skill and say that you wish to be considered as that for evaluation purposes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your job is to be an instructor. I think the employer is perfectly entitled to ask you to deliver any training which you are competent to provide, and to send you on training courses from time to time.

 

I don't see why getting training should entitle you to receive a pay rise, unless it means you are required to work outside your additional hours.

 

Personally, I agree with the employer that an employed instructor should be providing courses according to demand. I don't see how they can accept an instructor deciding what courses he wants to run and which he doesn't want to run within his contracted hours.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...