Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • unclebulgaria67
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By unclebulgaria67 · Posted

      Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • tobyjugg2
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By tobyjugg2 · Posted

      Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • dx100uk
      Judge & Priestly

      By dx100uk · Posted

      when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • Bhindi lover
      Judge & Priestly

      By Bhindi lover · Posted

      I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • dx100uk
      PRA Group - PAPLOC now Claimform - Halifax Loan £20k+

      By dx100uk · Posted

      Please fill this out   Dx Pl

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All
Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Finance U aka Corner Park Garage - claim form***Claim Dismissed***

RCT40

By RCT40
in Legal Successes

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2612 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

theoldrouge

theoldrouge

Posted
Posted

Excellent ws so far, thought there may be CCTA ref on the pci (top right) reinforces your argument

Maybe an idea to include highlighted copy of code as a doc

 

Will have further look to see what else may be relevant

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

That doc is incredible!!!

What rip off merchants

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Excellent ws so far, thought there may be CCTA ref on the pci (top right) reinforces your argument

Maybe an idea to include highlighted copy of code as a doc

 

Will have further look to see what else may be relevant

 

Thanks Rouge, I'm planning LOADS of documents along with the WS, and also I think its worth a punt at the counter claim also!

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Excellent ws so far, thought there may be CCTA ref on the pci (top right) reinforces your argument

Maybe an idea to include highlighted copy of code as a doc

 

Will have further look to see what else may be relevant

 

Just sent you a PM, hope thats ok!

Link to post
Share on other sites
theoldrouge

theoldrouge

Posted
Posted

Would ideally like to see what the claimant comes up with first, as you may have to alter quiet substantially

 

When are the WS due?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Would ideally like to see what the claimant comes up with first, as you may have to alter quiet substantially

 

When are the WS due?

 

I don't think there is much more I can add to the WS now, other than correct typos and pull documents together, although, as you say that might change once theirs is received.

 

WS due 25th November, and I plan to hand deliver on the day. Amazing the number of guests that appear here once something is added to the thread!

Link to post
Share on other sites
theoldrouge

theoldrouge

Posted
Posted

Don't forget your SAR narrative as a doc to show no DN issued

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Don't forget your SAR narrative as a doc to show no DN issued

 

Will do, thanks.:-)

 

Also just remembered that I've not talked about the BOS not being registered on time due to them changing dates - which has dawned on me is oddly the day after the new tax year begins.

Link to post
Share on other sites
theoldrouge

theoldrouge

Posted
Posted

Yes I wondered sometime ago if it was something to do with booking the profit into a new tax year

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Yes I wondered sometime ago if it was something to do with booking the profit into a new tax year

 

Can I get away with suggesting this? I can't come up with any other reason for them being so stupid changing dates. I checked back on the previous finance agreement to this one, and my debit card payments for that one match the agreement dates precisely.

Link to post
Share on other sites
theoldrouge

theoldrouge

Posted
Posted

Not really just speculation

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
theoldrouge

theoldrouge

Posted
Posted

Don't forget to emphasise the fact that as you signed the agreement on March 31, their dated pre contract cannot comply with s55/55a cca1974

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Don't forget to emphasise the fact that as you signed the agreement on March 31, their dated pre contract cannot comply with s55/55a cca1974

 

Yes will do, there are plenty of letters I wrote, before seeing any agreements where I quoted the date - I also including the hand written OFT complaint form which states the correct date (31/3/12) and also their response to my complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Don't forget your SAR narrative as a doc to show no DN issued

 

Rouge, something just occurred to me, not sure whether it is significant or not, I was issued with a default notice back in May 2012, as there was a mix up in payment dates which was sorted - I have addressed this in my WS and plan to include a copy - however I didn't receive a copy of this as part of my SAR - which if I'm not mistaken should have contained every document, electronic or physical they hold?

Link to post
Share on other sites
theoldrouge

theoldrouge

Posted
Posted

Should have been included, but not vital to your case as it was remedied anyway

Possible later complaint

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Should have been included, but not vital to your case as it was remedied anyway

Possible later complaint

 

 

Thanks, I realise its not really significant to my case, other than the fact that the SAR was not correctly complied with.

 

 

In essence it shows this company has a disregard for following rules and regulations.

I'll leave you in peace now, I can't take anymore of looking at this today.

 

 

Again I can't thank you enough for the help and advice you've given thus far

- and will make a donation to this site once its all over,

as I want to do my bit helping to keep this site running

so that others as unfortunate as myself to have crossed paths with this company (and many like it) can be steered in the right direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted
Rouge, something just occurred to me, not sure whether it is significant or not, I was issued with a default notice back in May 2012, as there was a mix up in payment dates which was sorted - I have addressed this in my WS and plan to include a copy - however I didn't receive a copy of this as part of my SAR - which if I'm not mistaken should have contained every document, electronic or physical they hold?

 

Well there not going to include it if its devastating to their case :wink:

 

With regards to your PM RCT...Does the direction specify that you both submit witness statements? One claim form same claim number both named defendants on the same claim?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
RCT40

RCT40

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Well there not going to include it if its devastating to their case :wink:

 

With regards to your PM RCT...Does the direction specify that you both submit witness statements? One claim form same claim number both named defendants on the same claim?

 

Andy

 

Point taken Andy :-D

 

We received a direction each, but yes same claim number, both listed as defendants on the same claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Thats fine...so yes I would agree that your wife's WS should be minimal as you are the main party....but you should include a provisio within her WS that this is in conjunction with your WS.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Attachments unapproved...you must remove any names in the claimants statement RCT40..

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...